Pros And Cons Of Stricter Gun Control Laws

Good Essays
SHOULD GUN CONTROL LAWS BE MORE STRICT?
Should Gun Control Laws Be More Strict? Many individuals do not believe that carrying a gun will make them safer; On the contrary many of them carry both openly and concealed and society is better for it. One could ask why society would be better for it? There are many answers someone could provide, but one of the most logical ones would be "If they did somehow manage to take away legal weapons? That would still leave criminals happily armed" (Burrus,2015). That is a scary thing to think about when you are in a dangerous situation, or if someone else was in a dangerous situation and could not be helped because of the gun control law. One could say that guns kill people, or argue that people kill people; People get stabbed,but you do not see the goverment banning knives. Many people believe that stricter gun control laws
…show more content…
That is a scary thought because what happens when we as people are not allowed to conceal a firearm anymore? That is giving the criminals more power than they already have by not letting the average person defend themselves."Very few members of gangs walk our streets minus a gun. From renegade motorcycle gangs to inner city street gangs to international cartel gang members, every one of them is strapped. We don 't need footnoted statistics to know the truth of that"(Geer,2014). One would want to have a weapon just incase the oppertuinty arose and having stricter gun laws might make the person very cautious when going out. So now one can see that having stricter gun control laws would not make crime better ,but ultimately make it

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Gun Control: Unconstitutional or Constructive? In a nation of differing opinions, a few issues stick out. Gun control is one of them, a widely debated subject punctuated by acts of heinous violence. In an attempt to curb this violence, articles such as “Crime, Deterrence, and Right‐to‐Carry Concealed Handguns”, by John Lott, argue that less gun control would lead to less crime. The other side of the coin argues that more gun control would lead to less violence, and this is the argument that the article “GUN CONTROL AFTER HELLER AND MCDONALD: WHAT CANNOT BE DONE AND WHAT OUGHT TO BE DONE”, by Gary Kleck, takes.…

    • 1331 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    There is a lot of crime in this world and a lot of it associates with gun use, but taking away guns isn’t the best option. Putting restrictions and so forth on the use of buying and selling of guns is the best way to go. Many arguments out there say that if they were to allow someone to have a gun then it will automatically turn into a murder or big crime. Whatever happened…

    • 2031 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Some families use their guns to get their food. Others use them for protection. So even if the government wanted to take guns away, people are going to protest on the fact that they use their guns for useful, non-violent purposes. Not everyone uses their guns to try and hurt people. Dalmia also mentions in the article, “No matter how much liberals want a gun-free paradise, they can’t simply wish away a deeply entrenched gun culture.…

    • 776 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    To begin with, guns are not safe. There are those people who believe that guns have no role in the hands of people, if we don 't have gun control, anyone can easily get guns. It is dangerous that if the people who don’t have enough knowledge of using guns. Gun owners are more dangerous than others who don’t have weapons, even though the gun owners are victims of the crimes. Similarly, guns can cause unintentional crimes.…

    • 1103 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    But, it’s important to get guns out of the hands of the people who wish to do harm to others or who are very likely to do harm to others. Stricter gun laws should make it harder for people that don’t need guns to get them, keeping Americans safe from gun violence. The United States will not be able to get rid of its 301 million guns, but if the flow of the firearms is restricted, then the country will be a more secure place as a…

    • 1502 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Concealed carry is a law that has been in controversy for several decades. A majority of people say that not being able to carry a gun is violating their rights. Others say that they don 't feel safe when there are guns around and can cause more harm than good. The use of concealed and carry weapons could reduce the number of mass shootings by making criminals not want to commit the crimes because the people who are armed would be able to defend themselves. To understand concealed and carry, people need to understand what gun control really is.…

    • 1892 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Self - protection and gun control are still a big topic of discussion. There are those who are against self-protection and want strict laws set for gun usage and there are others who don’t want to have strict restrictions for guns and who are for self-protection or their rights to bear arms. Without researching the topic, I would believe it could be beneficial to carry a concealed weapon around in case someone was in trouble. I could also see it being a terrible mistake if it got into the wrong hands, too. Therefore, I will research if carrying concealed weapons such as guns, or if gun control would be a good or bad option for the U.S. First, to put it simply carrying concealed weapons could help save somebodies life.…

    • 1271 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    That when you buy a gun, you’re either going to be hurting yourself or another person. The Board also makes note of how officials try to distract the public with “arguments about the word terrorism,” (End the Gun Epidemic in America), but aren’t calling the shooting sprees and other gun shootings terrorism. Pathos was used well here because terrorism is always going to be an emotional and frightening topic to think or talk about. Especially since it’s happening in your own country but no one wants to shed light to the idea that mass shootings are related to terrorism. Pathos was effective because the argument to stricter gun laws provoked fear and emotions by shedding light on the real reason to buy a…

    • 1105 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The reason why we should not have stricter gun control law is because the problem is not adding more gun laws that will not solve the solution to why we have deaths or guns falling to the wrong people. With or without gun control law; criminals will still get a hold of one. Instead of trying to enforce more gun control laws, we should focus on educating the people about the safety of gun usage and by owning a gun does have the advantages of protect not only oneself, but your…

    • 817 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In the past few decades, firearms have had a big impact on society. These impacts have been both good and evil, and have caused controversy on the topic of gun ownership. Some groups, such as the Brady Campaign, would like to see gun control laws take away some rights and restrict others, whereas the National Rifle Association would like to protect gun rights and educate society on the use of firearms. Both sides want to stop the problem of gun violence, but protecting gun rights is the only way to truly insure public safety. Gun control will not be able to stop the use of guns, and it will put citizens in an unfair situation where they cannot protect themselves.…

    • 1808 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Decent Essays