Pros And Cons Of State Law

Improved Essays
I believe that the diversity of state laws and procedures has many benefits but also many disadvantages. On the one hand, it allows a state to be more flexible, and establish laws that better suit that particular state. On the other hand, however, it becomes a complex issue when every state contains different laws, which generally can confuse people.
In the present, we do know that there is no uniformity of all laws nationwide. I believe that for a person who lives in California, it is impractical to learn all the laws of other states, such as New York, Nevada, Hawaii or other states, merely because they are vacationing or temporarily residing within the state. If there was an online website or a mobile app that everyone could have before traveling to other states, and quickly see major or dramatic laws within the state that differ in
…show more content…
Many benefits can be attained from this, including well-informed citizens, established law and punishments, and regulation.
It is important to declare that I am not in favor of making every single state law that varies from state-to-state federally universal. Many laws including immigration, religion, and other sensate subjects are handled different on a state-by-state basis. I believe that in those cases, we do need state governments to maintain their power, because without it, citizens statewide would feel no benefit in living in a state rather than in another. Living in a state would merely be reduced to geographic location, which we know indeed that that is not the case when most of us decide to live in a place over another.
In conclusion, the lack of uniformity in all state laws does create confusion, problems, and issues for many people, who we may consider to be an unfair case. However, in my opinion, I believe that it is better to have those issues of contingency, rather than having a federal-only equalized set of laws in our

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Glt1 Task 1

    • 630 Words
    • 3 Pages

    TASK1 1. Constituion of Australia 2. It controls the government of Australia 3. Legislative,executive and judicial power 4. Legislative power writes the law 5.…

    • 630 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Despite the fact that the Constitution was written based on Federalist theories, it still allowed some power to rest only in the hands of the state government. This made American citizens content in the United States’ newly established…

    • 1137 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Arguments: Congress desired to have all states have…

    • 445 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The court can declare state regulations unconstitutional if deem to be unreasonable on interstate commerce. Federal preemption gives congress the power to regulate an entire field even if no conflict exists between state and federal…

    • 349 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Texas Argument Analysis

    • 777 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Recently, there has been an argument in the State of Texas about the power of the State and the local governments. This argument had raised up after Gregg Abbott warned about the “Californization” of Texas, and in follow passing laws that limited the power of local governments on issues like fracking in their cities. These arguments are similar to those that are for the powers for the State versus Federal government. Hence, there are lots of arguments for and against the local control, and on the other hand, it is hypocritical for the state government to impose its will on the policies.…

    • 777 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The federal government has certain powers for making important decisions while state governments can make their own laws governing local issues. They share powers to make sure one doesn't get to powerful then the other. This is like the system of Checks and Balances. The Constitution limits many powers in our government. The Constitution has a check for anything and everything is always in order.…

    • 471 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Pro Impeachment for Andrew Jackson; Introduction; The impeachment of Andrew Jackson is imminent just as much as a necessity for further development regarding the states. Jackson’s interference in the Nullification process occurring in South Carolina proves a disregard for the state’s rights versus the federal words and laws. By continuing his ordinance against Carolina, he caused a disruption in the economy as well as forced political decisions upon its independency in Unions. His excuses of enacting the ordinance via the resistance of Carolina is unconstitutional at best, and at worse, a true eye opener for what could be forward to come if such actions are allowed in future undertakes.…

    • 751 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    To create well operating Government, with content citizens, there needs to be a balance of power. Federalism has the ability to stop racist, homophobic, and discriminative laws created by the states. Yet, federalism also has the ability to become more centralized and lose focus and control over the different states. For example, during a Macro Economics lecture last semester the professor stated, under the Soviet Union a Russian nail factory once received orders to create a certain amount of weight in nails. However, the workers didn’t create multiple nails and instead created one large nail weighing the correct amount.…

    • 1111 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Most people would agree that laws are something that were created to help people. Most of the help is figuring out who is right, how to handle something, or rules to follow (Behl, 2016). Hardly anyone would argue that this is a bad thing, until the law itself breaks the rules. Many laws can, in fact, contradict themselves. An example of this is the juvenile justice system and being able to wave the juvenile to adult court.…

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Having laws passed among all fifty states also maintains unity among the country and keeps all states on the same level as far as important regulations go. Also, each state has the equal power to bring an issue to Washington in hopes that it becomes favorable among legislators as well. In a country where discrimination has been present in more than just a few ways, federalism allows for the continuity of rules that can be guaranteed to be withheld for all people of all…

    • 1705 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It helps the smaller states because everyone has the same number of people which is two. That is, how the great compromise fixes tyranny. In conclusion, federalism, the separation of power, checks, and balances, and the great compromise helped prevent tyranny. All of these rules helped the United States stay a tyranny-free nation because they all stopped all the power from being in the same place.…

    • 883 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    This is because a state and local government make the citizen feel closer to their elected representative to voice their opinions. Also a strong state government can design policy, according to the local political culture and economic condition that might be more applicable to the local people; therefore the local government might be able to have a better distribution of resources, since they can localize the budget and fully utilized the resources they have. A strong state government is more likely to have better accountability since it is relatively easy to identify which department is held…

    • 1528 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    to help the nation as a whole. However, the State’s government differs a little when compared to the Federal government. The Federal government takes into account the whole nation—United States in this case—when governing. The State government only takes into account itself—California in this case. Looking at the three branches of the Federal government—the executive, judicial and legislative, one can see the differences starting…

    • 1224 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Introduction This paper will define what statutory criminal law is on the state and federal levels of government. This paper will also look at the states authority to enact criminal laws by statute, and what the states limitations are in doing so. This paper will further explore the federal government’s authority to enact statutory criminal laws and what its limitations are. Lastly, this paper will describe what powers political subdivisions have in making statutory criminal laws.…

    • 1077 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The State government runs the state that it is in and they are a higher level of government than the local level, which controls whatever city of county that they are in. One of the State government’s roles is to promote the state’s economy and take control over a lot of the government programs, such as risk and social management programs (Norman, 2008). Also just like how the Federal government controls the State government, the State government controls and watches over the the Local government’s of the State’s counties and cities. Another added power that the states have is that the Tenth Amendment of the Constitution states that any and all powers that aren’t under the Federal government’s control is then reserved to later be put under the states and it’s people. All state governments are complex and exact duplicates of the federal government and are made up of three different branches of government; executive, legislative, and judicial.…

    • 1129 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays