Pros And Cons Of Stare Decisis

Improved Essays
How would you explain or describe common law, stare decisis and the use of precedence in the United States? What do you think about the power of the courts under this system? What are the pros and cons (good and bad) aspects of this type of legal system?

Common Law is the laws that developed from English court decisions and customs and that form the basis of laws in the U.S. Stare decisis distinguishes the common law from the civil-law system. It gives a great weight to the code of laws and the opinions of scholars explaining them. In other words, common law is also known as stare decisis. In the principle of stare decisis it isn’t always applied with uniform strictness. The Stare decisis is not usually use in the civil law system because
…show more content…
I believe that this system is undemocratic. A drawback to this is that over time is that a law maybe no longer found applicable or a new decision has been found but can be undesirable. This drawback is common in two ways: 1. The ruling of the court case, 2. Sentencing or judicial decision of the case. Another reasons why I don’t really agree with this system because maybe previous decisions by judges don’t necessarily embody the law. This legal system isn’t really a good system because the judges look at the cases and see that they are similar to a previous one and just gives the same verdict as the last one but you are able to provide other facts and show other wise and they don’t look at it just because you had a similar case like another one. It’s like you’re not really getting the right sentencing or judicial decision to your case that you brought. People may that it’s a good system because it helps judges save time and energy but are they treating everyone fairly to the Constitution. I think people who are loyal and obeys the Constitution are more important than people who are not loyal to the unconstitutional …show more content…
It also saves time and energy of judges so they don’t have to determine the same question of law over and over again since it has been settled once already. If the legislature wants to alter the case law by statute, the legislature is empowered to do so. It is flexible in the law and how it is being shaped according to the social, economic and other circumstances. Some cons of this type of legal would be that it is undemocratic, how it allows unelected judges to make the law. It is not mandated by the Constitution so it may result in unconstitutional results, so it maybe abled to get reexamined. Some judges are accused in applying the doctrine selectively, by invoking to support precedents which they do support anyway but ignoring it in order to change precedents with the one the judge disagreed with. Another con is that the doctrine of binding precedent can prevent the development of a

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    3. Common law is the basis of the U.S. laws. Through judicial decisions in England a body of law was formed that focused on precedents, customs, and statues. This was known as common…

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    There have been many influences on Canadian law including Hammurabi, Mosaic, and Roman. Britain has had the most influence on Canadian law. Although there have been many influences on Canada 's legal system, Britain has had the most impact for reasons such as Trial by Combat and Ordeal, Common Law, Rule of Law and the British North American Act of 1867. The impact that the Hammurabi laws have had on Canada 's legal system today is that the laws are known, along with the hierarchy of laws.…

    • 1277 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    1. The Supreme Court decisions in a case affect significantly the entire country’s legal system. Therefore, models of judicial decision making were created to explain the Supreme Court’s behavior and how they influence policies. While the legal, attitudinal and the strategic model are not the only theories of judicial decision making, those constitute the most prevalent hypotheses to explain judicial decisions.…

    • 1172 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A judge might feel compelled to sway one way for the simple fact of his publicity. This can also be a strength because the justice might feel more confident in a decision because the public agrees with…

    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Our system is very unfair, and even though there has been a lot of improvement over the years, there is still work to be done, because not everyone is treated equally by the law. It is time for our justice system to…

    • 717 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Supreme Court justices do have personal views. They are appointed through a political process. Observers naturally must ask how great a role their political views actually play. Some scholars argue that the justices’ political preferences play a large role, essentially dictating their decisions in many cases. They point to the fact that justices appointed by conservative presidents tend to vote in a conservative fashion and those appointed by liberal presidents vote the opposite way.…

    • 1170 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Define the following 25 legal terms: 1.HIPAA Privacy Rule _Federal regulations created to implement the privacy requirements within the administrative simplification subtitle of HIPPA of 1996 and safeguard identifiable health information. ________________________ 2.HIPAA Security Rule _Federal regulations created to implement the security requirements within the administrative simplification subtitle of the HIPPA 1996 ________________________ 3.Medical malpractice __A type of action in which the plaintiff must demonstrate that a physician-patient, nurse-patient, therapist-patient, or other healthcare provider-patient relationship existed at the time of the alleged wrongful act.…

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Stare decisis is the principle that past decisions made by the judicial system are applied to similar issues within the jurisdiction. In the case Griswold V. Connecticut the initial ruling was over turned by the Supreme Court, finding that Connecticut’s Laws on birth control were unconstitutional. The defendants were initially charged with accessories in the assistance of preventing conception. The Supreme Court reversed this ruling because married couples have the right to privacy, in which, they have the right to seek medical assistance to prevent conception. Roe V. Wade’s reversal was built on the precedent of Griswold V. Connecticut’s rights of privacy.…

    • 212 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In recent years, the Texas Senate has voted to discard a law that has been in effect for nearly seven decades: the Two Thirds Rule. This rule was said to make it easier for Democrats to block out any bills under Republican chambered control. The two thirds rule has been view by those who are against it as a way of protecting the interests of minorities, especially where the issues are not supported. Those who are in support of the rule regard it as a crucial part “of preserving the collegiality of the Senate,” as well as giving Senators some cover on controversial.…

    • 167 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The role of Judges in our court system is one of the most important roles within our relative communities, they are the main point of interpretation when it comes to the law. Be it civil or criminal, they assess the evidence, and hopefully have an unbiased mind towards the pursuit of justice. Despite legislature being made through Parliament, Judges are able to teach the people through the means of precedent what laws actually mean. They help the general public to know to what extent they are abiding by the law and punishable offences under the law. The question that is being asked is whether or not Judges have the right to be creative in their rulings, or should they simply apply the law just the way it is?…

    • 1112 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The common law system is a system of laws based on judicial decisions, rather than on statutes or constitutions. The United States adopted the English version of the common law system during the colonial years. The…

    • 1591 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Common Law And Islamic Law

    • 1494 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Whincup, 1992). The Normans introduced the institution of jury and the absence of the written letter of the law. Common law is laws that are known widely but may not be written down just common sense laws. Stare decisis is an important feature that developed from common law. British colonies adopted the common law as the law of the land.…

    • 1494 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Customary law is a system based on the interpretation of a court case, based on prior cases. This approach is called stare decisis (Scalia 4) which is deciding a case based on precedent. The practice of stare decisis is highly criticized by Scalia. Justice Scalia explains that the system of case precedent or common law review, has two main problems. The first one cited by Justice Scalia is that, common law review applied the law to the fact of a case.…

    • 1507 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dworkin on Judicial Discretion in “Hard Cases” Lu Zhao Boyu (Bozy) | A0127866R In the standard courtroom, one could reasonably expect the judge to be the one responsible for the holding of a case. However, does and should the judge exercise his own discretion when deciding cases? Prominent legal theorist H. L. A. Hart claims that judges do exercise discretion, especially in “hard cases”, where there is no pre-existing or unambiguous rule. To this matter, Hart’s brilliant student Ronald Dworkin offers an alternative theory, which argues that judges do not have discretion and should follow principles instead of rules, even in “hard cases”.…

    • 910 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Acts of parliament often provide a general instruction on the law but not how it would work in theory. It is therefore up to judges to examine specific facts for each case, interpret legislation and administer the law in line with their findings. Common law is consistent yet flexible in that it is a constantly evolving whilst maintaining its system of precedent. It allows the courts to create rules of law based on individual and new cases which can be used in future cases to offer guidance. With equity as a characteristic of this system built on precedent, a common set of principle are applied to all people regardless of their status and procedure have been set to provide equality and fairness to all.…

    • 1466 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays

Related Topics