When you get a liver and you have three people who need it, who should get it? We tried to come up with an ethically defensible answer. Because we have to choose,”(Monti) There isn't enough organs out their for these people and it's sad that they have to choose.
They choose to find someone and drug them for their organ to steal it is not right .“The stealing of organs of a person that has been roofied or drugged then sold on the black market should be stopped,”(Monti) The stealing of the organs is crazy that they will stay at at clubs and people that are lured to either have a good time or just to be nice to the person that's alone and being caring can get their organs taken out of their body after they get drugged and then feel the pain of your organ that has been taken is unbearable.
The selling and the use of human organs .On how they are being used either for The stolen ones from people that were drugged to doctors only using organs to help people . It is the main thing that isn't being looked at really until the thing is taken from your body or from a loved one it's not really on any ones mind …show more content…
It is the main reason that I don't want to be lured to be drugged and an organ of mine taken and I die in the next hour .The fact that it is being sold for money makes me sick that they think somone that need it to live just loses.
With it
Monti, Jennifer. "The Sale of Human Organs Should Be Allowed." Is Selling Body Parts Ethical? Ed. Christine Watkins. Detroit: Greenhaven Press, 2013. At Issue. Rpt. from "The Case for Compensating Live Organ Donors." Competitive Enterprise Institute [CEI]. 2009. Opposing Viewpoints in Context. Web. 9 Sept. 2016.
Not with
Stempsey, William E. "Selling Human Organs Is Unethical." Technology and Society. Ed. Auriana Ojeda. San Diego: Greenhaven Press, 2002. Opposing Viewpoints. Rpt. from "Paying People to Give Up Their Organs: The Problem with Commodification of Body Parts." Medical Humanities Review (Fall 1996). Opposing Viewpoints in Context. Web. 9 Sept.