Pros And Cons Of Proslavists

Decent Essays
What are proslavists? These were the ones that were in favor of slavery. Proslavists denied things like freedom, liberty, and equality to an entire population of black people with the ideas about science, religion, economics, etc. The ideas were that proslavists thought that slaves would help them economically by picking up their crops. In addition, they would have to have enough slaves to work in their plantation, if not, proslavists would not get any profit for their crops. In fact, the idea of proslavists being in favor of slavery made people believe things that came from the bible. Not to mention, John C. Calhoun argued that defending slavery was to the road of American freedom.
John C. Calhoun was the seventh vice president of the United States of American. He was considered the strongest defender of slavery. He argued that slavery was the road to the American freedom. “Many in the South once believed that it was a moral and political evil; that folly and delusion are gone; we see it now in its true light, and regard it as the most safe and stable basis for free institutions in the world.” (John C. Calhoun Sees “Slavery in its true light…” (1838). He said that the for this political system to be balance blacks and whites have to get along. People killing each other are only causing more destruction to the population. His idea was that if all
…show more content…
Calhoun thinking slavery was the road to American freedom, and proslavists saying that slaves helped them economically was why overall proslavists defended slavery as a whole. Proslavists thought it was required to have slavery to benefit them as a whole. Without having slavery in the population, there would be a lot of damage to the population in addition, to both races. For example, blacks being lazy and not working. Whites being affected by this because of getting no beneficial income from their crops. Overall, proslavists defend slavery to the ideas to what they

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The Cornerstone Speech

    • 815 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Alexander H. Stephens was known as the Vice President of Confederacy. As you know the Confederacy was a strong supporter of the idea of enslavement of Africans. They also believed that there was not any moral issues because they were not actual people. We today however know that this is completely incorrect. Alexander Stephens will eventually give a speech addressing the Confederate named the Cornerstone.…

    • 815 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Constitution Dbq

    • 1305 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The Constitution is the one document that essentially holds the nation together. It defines what is and is not permissible under the law of the land — it IS the law of the land. Being that slavery was a major problem during the nineteenth century (and late eighteenth century), it was only natural that historians turn towards the dogma of the United States. Although historians had different interpretations, there is only one that seemed logical and had substance. The forefathers of America whom wrote the constitution intended for it to offer protection for the institution of slavery (in other words, it was pro-slavery) because they, themselves, were slaveowners and made no conscious effort to eradicate slavery even though they had to opportunity…

    • 1305 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Before the civil war, the states was separate with their own rule of living. The north was full of free state and the south was full of slave states. In this country, slaves was necessary for making money. Yet, they treat them as they was not human even in the free states. The north made a thing called the union with will bring everyone together but, the south didn't want to be apart of it.…

    • 456 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Slavery is a major part of U.S. History regardless of the negative reflection it puts on the United States. Slavery divided politicians, as well as states. Slavery was not the reason for the Civil War in the beginning, but it was always a main factor of the war, especially after the Emancipation Proclamation was introduced. In the article, “A Man but Not a Brother: Abraham Lincoln and Racial Equality”, by George M. Fredrickson, writes about Lincoln and his stance on slavery. Fredrickson records that Lincoln never really took a stance on slavery throughout his politician career, that he would have views for both against slavery and for slavery at times.…

    • 817 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Henry Clay Dbq

    • 568 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Henry Clay spoke for most people in the West because he and most of the people thought that they should have better roads, canals, and waterway systems. Henry Clay was also a lawyer and that was another reason on why he was a spokesperson for all the people. John C. Calhoun advocated for the south's “interests” but not all of the southerners because not all southerners had different ideas. Daniel Webster opposed the national tariff at first but then came to support it to try to protect some industries that were located in the Northwest. In 1811 the charter for the First National Bank had expired.…

    • 568 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Civil War Dbq

    • 889 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Civil War was a product of a great divide between two sides of an unfortunately broken country. The North and South found contrasts in various areas; from the economy, to culture, to standpoints on slavery. In the eyes of few, there is a belief that the war could have been avoided. However, due to the differing cultures and beliefs of the North and the South, the division in the country was far too large, thus rendering the war inevitable. The most prominent cause of the Civil War was the issue of divergent cultures and economies between the North and South.…

    • 889 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The issue of slavery in the United States became paramount in the late nineteenth century. There were two clear sides in this debate, those pro-slavery and those anti-slavery. This division was quite geographical, pitting the South against the North. Regional differences between the North and the South led to fierce conflict, particularly over the issue of slavery. The Northern states were free states, against the idea of slavery.…

    • 1039 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Pro Slavery Movement Essay

    • 1228 Words
    • 5 Pages

    During this period the pro slavery supporters became more aggressive with there efforts to keep slavery alive. Allegations like “any disastrous occurrences disturb the South, not only the whites and negroes of the slave-holding states would sink into poverty and suffering.” 3 Furthermore, “Every country must have its labourers, men who are willing to be directed by the mind and capital of others.” 4 The South argued that someone had to do the hard labor to start building the country.…

    • 1228 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    John Calhoun 's view on what were the principle issues between the North and the South, the greatest question was what begun the entire trial of sectionalism where he calls attention to the Missouri Compromise, which did not explain the countries position on servitude. John Calhoun communicates how subjection is profoundly installed inside American culture, essentially the South, which is the reason it must be protected. Calhoun depicts the South as effectively frail since the begin of bargains and demands that if any trade off to be made, it be built up in the fine print of the Constitution, instead of an understanding between the two. Calhoun is communicating that the South can 't work effectively with the North as they are conflicting with them in a restricting way, instead of in concordance. Calhoun 's perspectives on sectionalism clarified…

    • 1629 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The South was as secure in their conviction that slavery was a proper institution as the Minutemen who turned the British back at the Old North Bridge were in theirs. The insulation of the South allowed these convictions to thrive without serious opposition in local communities. With everyone thinking and therefore voting the same way it was easy to keep slavery alive for decades. Insomuch as they believed the proslavery position was unfounded in reality putting forward idealized and sometimes fantastical ideas of Southern society and slave holding. The slave’s perspective was very much real where even in the best position slaves still felt the fear of sale and control by whites.…

    • 911 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Proslavery Analysis

    • 762 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Proslavery would be easy to support if you weren’t a slave. Out of the “Proslavery” authors none were in the slightest slaves themselves. The spoke as if they were a representative of the slave and this was accepted by the slave(s). The justification of slavery is written as though they are “protected” and in their own rights free to do as they please, given they work “no less than nine hours a day.” (Fitzhugh)…

    • 762 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Chandra Manning’s “What this Cruel War was over” poses the question of what the Civil War was fought over. She then introduces the argument that the war was undeniably over slavery. Using the letters, diaries and newspapers of soldiers who lived and fought during the civil war Manning explains the ways in which slavery and race relations influences the men who volunteered and fought in the civil war. Manning begins her book with three quotations that back up her argument.…

    • 821 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    First, Abraham Lincoln’s election as president was a huge blow to the southern community, as it made them nervous he would eventually abolish slavery. They considered this a threat to their luxury of enjoying the profit of slavery. Although Lincoln was clear about his opposition of slavery he also admitted he had not intention of messing with the South’s slave system. For example, Lincoln said, “I have no purpose, directly or indirectly, to interfere with the institution of slavery in the States where it exists (Hine, 2014).” Be that as it may, the South was not convinced.…

    • 860 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Slavery has had a major impact on both the North and the South although neither shared a common view on slavery .It was tolerated by the North and accepted by the South then some factors arose that began to influence people 's attitudes toward slavery especially during a specific time period .Between 1830 and 1860 the attitudes of the North and the South toward slavery drastically varied due to economic,social, and political factors. For many years the economic benefits of slavery were the leading arguments from the south to maintain slavery. With the argument being that without slavery there would be a large damaging economic impact in the South where slave labor was the foundation of their economy and that there would be widespread unemployment…

    • 1043 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    John C. Calhoun is widely known for his “positive good of slavery” speech. He argues that slavery isn’t immoral since he believed, “that in the present state of civilization, where two races of different origin, and distinguished by color, and other physical differences, as well as intellectual, are brought together, the relation now existing in the slave holding states between the two, is instead of an evil, a good-a positive good.” Many viewed slaveries as a depravity but Johns views were diverse since he didn’t see slavery as a flaw to American society. John had the mind set of convincing people that goodness is the only thing that came out of slavery since it helped America progress in many ways. Despite many people going against his speech,…

    • 1104 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays