Pros And Cons Of Plea Bargaining

Improved Essays
What is plea bargaining? To some individuals this is an easy way out for the criminals who have committed the crimes that they are charged for but all in all the criminal is receiving some type of punishment that gives a small glimpse into their future. May not be the sentence the families of the victim or victims, the prosecutor, or the public society were hoping for. Throughout this paper, I will be sharing some knowledge of Plea Bargaining.
Before the suspect is even offered the plea bargain, the pretrial has begun to hear the indictment and allow the defendant to enter a plea. Once, the defendant entered the plea the prosecutor has the power to decide if the case is worth prosecuting. Prosecutor will then decide on what the charges will be and at this point certain criteria needs to be met. The criteria that needs to be met is: They found a crime has been committed; the criminal can be identified; and there is enough evidence for a guilty charge. The prosecutor, who is the most powerful in the administration of justice, will meet with the defense attorney, defendant, and in some jurisdictions the judge, to come to an agreement on the sentence.
Defendants have the rights to hear their rights and options in a plea bargain. If
…show more content…
Improved conviction rates, ability to concentrate on perplexed cases, avoiding the trial and delays, are some of the pros of plea bargaining. The cons of plea bargaining are: The defendant could feel the need to take the plea; results in a different and lesser sentence; and it may pressure the innocent to plead guilty. There are many more pros and cons of plea bargaining that in time they could change. Some judges and attorneys do think this plea has taken the rights away of the defendants to have a trial. The plea bargain is like everything else in this world, take it or leave it. You going to take it and hope for the best or leave it and go with the

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Essay On Plea Bargaining

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages

    After a criminal act has been committed the defendant has to go through certain processes to be free. Defendants are given the opportunity to either choose to accept guilt or go to trial. The most common choice that many people choose is to plead guilty because it has its benefits. Criminals lives are determined if they chose to plead guilty and have Brady rights for the crimes that they've committed. Plea bargaining is when you plead guilty to a crime that you’ve committed.…

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This hearing determines if there is sufficient evidence that exists against an offender to continue the criminal justice process. The judge in this step searches for a probable cause to prove a crime was committed and the suspect accomplished doing so. Nevertheless, if a probable cause is determined, the accused suspect is held for trial on the information, which results in formal charging. In federal cases and other states, there is a grand jury that is empanelled to determine if there is enough evidence to file indictment charges against the suspect with the crimes. However if the grand jury finds there is sufficient evidence to warrant a trial it issues a true bill, if not it issues a no bill and he or she is filtered out of the criminal justice network (Appalachian State University, n.d).…

    • 1283 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Plea Bargaining Advantages

    • 1021 Words
    • 4 Pages

    With plea bargaining, the defendants pleads guilty and admits to the charges that they were accused of. This removes the uncertainty of a trial because there is no question about whether or not the defendant committed the crime. The defendant may receive a lesser sentence, however, they are still admitting to and being punished for the crimes they did commit. A defendant is likely to accept the plea bargain in order to avoid going to trial and having more evidence revealed that would result in them receiving harsher charges and sentencing. Plea bargaining would also benefit the prosecutor in this case because is their argument is weak or they are lacking evidence the defendant is still likely to be found guilty.…

    • 1021 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Essay On Plea Bargain

    • 1073 Words
    • 5 Pages

    defendants agree to plead guilty to some or all of the charges against them in exchange for concessions from the prosecutor's”("Plea Bargain"). When a defendant pleads guilty, they get privileges that they would not get otherwise. Sometimes the defendant is asked to do more for the prosecutor than just plead guilty. Cornell University of Law says,“Some plea bargains require defendants to do more than simply plead guilty. For example, prosecutors often offer favorable plea bargains to defendants who agree to testify for the state in cases against other defendants.” Some plea bargains require the defendant to do more than just admit to being guilty; The defendant may be asked to help the prosecutor, or state, in another…

    • 1073 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Plea Bargain Advantages

    • 2557 Words
    • 11 Pages

    When a defendant agrees to plead guilty the time spent on what would have been their trial can now be devoted to another defendant. When a defendant takes advantage of a plea deal, they are often granted leniency on their punishment compared to what they might have received if the case went to trial. An advantage for the prosecutor is not gambling the case in court and risk the case being dismissed, or the defendant found not guilty. Another benefit that plea bargains offer is saving the victim from testifying in court. Psychologically, testifying in court could be very traumatizing to the…

    • 2557 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The first being that an investigation is launched and through that investigations, evidence is gathered. Once the police feel that they have collected enough evidence to prove a certain person or persons committed the crime, the evidence is taken to a prosecutor who decides whether or not to arrest the individual. Then, when the offender is arrested for a crime, they are afforded certain rights such as the right to counsel, right to remain silent, right to trial by jury, and right to bail. Not all cases make it to trial. More specifically, most cases are plead out through the practice of plea bargaining.…

    • 755 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Jury Decision Making Essay

    • 1199 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Juror Decision-making Processes When the justice system brings a criminal case to trial, a defendant has a right to judgement by their peers, called jurors in the court system. Anyone accused of committing a crime is extended this right. The jurors cast a judgement called a verdict. Studying verdict outcomes is a prominent subject for…

    • 1199 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    First, the prosecutor will analyze the evidence that is gathered and decide whether to press charges or not. If he or she decides to press charges the offender will be scheduled for their first appearance in court. In their first appearance in court the accused will be notified of the charges that are being brought against him or her. Here they will also be read their rights and assigned an attorney if they cannot afford one. The next step is the bail or bond stage.…

    • 1580 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If the defendant does want to appeal a guilty plea, most likely the judge and the jury are asking them sleeves, “if he didn’t do it, then why did he admit to it”. Making it much harder for a guilty plea to be tossed. This also brings into question his or her creditability, changing your statement after some time to think about it may seem odd to some. Changing a plea is easier done by the defendant, if he or she has favorable evidence against the prosecutors case. This evidence may be the lack of creditability the prosecutors main witness, DNA evidence or something that can confirm his or her…

    • 751 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the United States criminal justice system, the prosecutor has the obligation for deciding what and how crimes will be prosecuted. The “legal system has traditionally accorded wide discretion to criminal prosecutors in the enforcement process”. As long as “the prosecutor has probable cause to believe that the accused committed an offense defined by statute, the decision whether or not to prosecute and what charge to file or bring before a grand jury, rests entirely in his discretion”. Granted with such discretion, state attorneys heavily rely upon victims in criminal cases as sources of information and have the ability to use such information in their decision-making. As was noted in Section I of this paper, while prosecutors do represent…

    • 1408 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays