What Is The Right To Choose Physician Assisted Suicide?

Good Essays
Eighteen states across the country are contemplating whether or not to make Physician assisted suicide (PAS) legal. PAS is legal in five states: Oregon, California, Vermont and Washington. Accepting physician-assisted suicide or a “right to suicide,” produces a wall between the patient and mental health treatments. PAS is when a licensed physician guides and aids a terminally ill patient, who which decides to kill himself by using prescribed drugs. Physicians are meant to care and have respect for the life of every human being. The intrinsic values of people and their life, such as health, friendship and wisdom are apart of humans. So, to act against any of these goods is also directly acting against the person. Human life is indistinguishable …show more content…
Why can’t physicians be able to eliminate a patient 's suffering by helping them to die? Yet, we need to know the distinction between suffering, and the person who is suffering. It is a mistake to intentionally destroy an innocent person; their dignity, by removing their pain through suicide. The moral or ethical side of this argument does not resolve the legal issue. Supporters of physician-assisted suicide claim that people 's freedom of choice should be honored, which means PAS should be legal. Given that, our autonomy should be respected; the law and medical foundations each have restrictions to people’s rights. All laws limit our autonomy to some expanse. For example, the law states that, “You shall not steal,” which must be followed but it is a limitation of our desire to perform that action. Is there something about the public good that needs to be protected by misuse of a freedom, that that freedom can be …show more content…
Agreeing to the process of PAS, shows terminally ill patients their live is not worth living. PAS communicates to the vulnerable, that by poor example, other patients will choose death as a benefit, over life that has become miserable to them. Physicians should not give up completely on the patient if their is no possible cure. The patient should die naturally with emotional support, be provided with a sufficient amount of pain control and keep a well communicated relationship with their physician and family. Advocates of Physician-assisted suicide propose that mercy killing is required because patients with a terminal illness, undergo unmanageable suffering. They insist that the only way to eradicate pain is to kill the patient. Patients and their physicians assume that those with a condition will be in a better state of not existing than suffering through pain and depression. Instead of killing the patient who is enduring pain, the better alternative is to guarantee that their suffering is controlled. Once the patient’s illness is managed, they will become less despondent, more in control with their thoughts and will be open to alternative

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Rationality Research Paper

    • 1550 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Therefore, if this were to instead be considered the intention, according to the DDE, Voluntary Euthanasia is not immoral. Besides, it has been previously argued that the intent for suicide through Voluntary Euthanasia is the agents’ . This ‘intent to kill/harm’ that is continuously brought up by opponents of Euthanasia, is not the physicians’. Therefore, (A) no longer stands. Against claim (B), in the case of Voluntary Euthanasia, death is the means to ending the agent’s suffering from a terminal illness.…

    • 1550 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Pas Vs Euthanasia

    • 928 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Typically the individual seeking PAS has a painful terminal illness and is the one to perform the “last act”. Both the physician and patient are aware and comprehend that the patient intends to use the medication or intervention method to commit suicide. PAS and euthanasia are commonly misperceived as interchangeable entities. Euthanasia is an inclusive term which describes the medical process of a sickly patient ending his/her life, rather than the continuation of suffering until an inevitable death. The main discrepancy is that Euthanasia involves the physician intentionally ending the life of his or her patient.…

    • 928 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Whereas in active or passive euthanasia, the doctor or physician either takes some sort of action to end a patient’s life, including simply withholding or withdrawing the treatment need to sustain life and allowing the patient to die1. Victor: I am having difficulty how they differ ethically. Dawn: To simplify, in physician assisted suicide, the patient dies on their own terms, but in euthanasia there are some moral questions regarding whether that person wanted to die. Victor: I believe those moral questions still regard death in general, suicide and assisting suicide are objectively morally wrong because they are choices contrary to the intrinsic good of an innocent human person. Dawn: You need to think of the cause of the suicide, not just the outcome.…

    • 1601 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Nonmaleficence And Suicide

    • 1990 Words
    • 8 Pages

    37). Another debatable principle when discussing physician assisted suicide, nonmaleficence is the main argument used to dispute its righteousness and virtue. Opponents argue that taking someone’s life is considered causing them harm and is one of the most harmful things to do to another person. They claim that physician assisted suicide violates the Hippocratic oath of healthcare professionals by essentially harming or killing another person. But in cases of physician assisted suicide, doctors are only providing the patients with lethal drugs, who then administer it to themselves.…

    • 1990 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    If people have the right to refuse life-saving treatments, then they should also have the right to end their own life. Indeed, while religious opponents disagree because they believe God decides when a person dies, I strongly agree that physician assisted suicide should be legal. This right would allow patients to leave this earth with dignity, save families from haunting memories, and relieve patients from insufferable pain. Nobody wants to die, however, when the time comes we should be able to make our own decision on how we will exit this…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Euthanasia is when the doctor gives the patient the medication, which will end the patient’s life. “Euthanasia opposers argue that if we embrace ‘the right to death with dignity’, people with incurable and debilitating illnesses will be disposed from our civilized society” (Math & Chaturvedi, 2012, p.899-902). People who are dealing with an incurable and debilitating illness are capable of making the choice to die. Especially, when there is no cure and the end results is the person will end up suffering with debilitating pain. This allows people the freedom to die in control and with dignity.…

    • 1771 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The world today is full of suffering. Many diseases are not curable, so it makes one’s life awful and gives a great encouragement to die. Even the fast progress in medicine does not give opportunities to save someone’s life or reduce her pain. However, in this world people have euthanasia, which comes from Greek words, Eu (good) and Thanatosis (death) meaning “Good Death”(“A General History Of Euthanasia”). As well, euthanasia is the proper term for mercy killing – practice purposely ending a life in order to simplify the pain.…

    • 1417 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Passive Euthanasia Summary

    • 1317 Words
    • 6 Pages

    He supports this argument by saying that for a patient with an incurable disease, it is better to kill the patient saving them from the pain and suffering, rather then just ceasing the treatment and letting them suffer until they die. Secondly, the author argues that conventional doctrine leading to their decisions is based on irrelevant…

    • 1317 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    According to the process of Euthanasia, the doctors are the ones questioned whether it is appropriate to carry out the process (Marker, 2013). Given this directive, people view it as a form of empowerment to decide whether the patient should die or not. It signifies a lack of confidence in the medical practices given the fact that technology has brought forth better medical services (Marker, 2013). Legalization of Euthanasia is a means of promoting suicide (Smith, 2002). Many people with pain will use it as a shortcut to end their lives, even when appropriate treatment is available.…

    • 2754 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The debate over Euthanasia is likely to persist sharp and violent because of negativism from sacred beliefs and other medical profession. “Assisted suicide is when someone provides an individual with the information, guidance and means to take his or her own life with the intention that they be used for this purpose. Physician-assisted suicide is when a doctor is the one who assists, such as by prescribing a lethal dose of medication. The only difference between assisted suicide and other forms of euthanasia is which person performs the final act that kills the patient. If a doctor performs the final act (e.g., an injection), it is euthanasia; if the patient performs the final act himself (e.g., ingesting pills), it is assisted suicide” (MCCFL).…

    • 1124 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays