Connor Laspina
Mr. Tedeschi
WAC
January 6, 2015
Why or Why Not College Athletes players should be paid
There has always been the controversy of why or why not division 1 college athletes should be paid, mainly because most of the athletes feel that they should be paid. For several years there have been debates and arguments about this. In my opinion there are pros and cons about this. Of course the college athletes themselves feel they should be paid but not everyone is on the same page with that. Some sources say that they should be paid and some say they should not.
There are different arguments for different reasons. There are twenty-five different sports men’ s and women. There are more popular sports than others. Football would be one …show more content…
Mark Brown is the coach for the University of Texas. Mark Brown has a salary of over $5 million dollars. The University of Texas football players received $3 in scholarships in 2014. Over the years the NCAA has trusted that the coaches maintain an amateur status. Conflicts like paying the athletes are very big in the NCAA. The first point in paying these athletes under the table is the fact that these men and women are students, they are not just athletes. This point of view would be way more realistic if these reasons were actually reasons for academics. These student athletes that Dennis A. Johnson (an editor for sports journalism) made the point that these student-athletes aren’t really students when it comes down to it. Between film room, weight training, practices, self-workouts, traveling, and finally competing in the game they play. So these student-athletes aren’t so many students as they are …show more content…
A distinction should be created whether or not or not the NCAA is in business to require advantage of xcapitalism and build cash. If no profits were taken, then the association would have associate argument against paying players. during a piece from the game Journal piece, the author points to Kahn’s argument that the NCAA acts sort of a trust in its actions. consistent with his study, in 2005 a draft prepared jock is value $495,000 and a draft prepared jock is value over $1.4 million to the NCAA severally.]This means the scholarship worth the player is receiving reciprocally for play is obscurity close to the player’s actual value to the varsity. This combined with the facts that players within the revenue sports receive no pay, and are restricted to once they will go skilled, exemplifies oppressive policy set forth by the association, in collusion with the skilled
Mr. Tedeschi
WAC
January 6, 2015
Why or Why Not College Athletes players should be paid
There has always been the controversy of why or why not division 1 college athletes should be paid, mainly because most of the athletes feel that they should be paid. For several years there have been debates and arguments about this. In my opinion there are pros and cons about this. Of course the college athletes themselves feel they should be paid but not everyone is on the same page with that. Some sources say that they should be paid and some say they should not.
There are different arguments for different reasons. There are twenty-five different sports men’ s and women. There are more popular sports than others. Football would be one …show more content…
Mark Brown is the coach for the University of Texas. Mark Brown has a salary of over $5 million dollars. The University of Texas football players received $3 in scholarships in 2014. Over the years the NCAA has trusted that the coaches maintain an amateur status. Conflicts like paying the athletes are very big in the NCAA. The first point in paying these athletes under the table is the fact that these men and women are students, they are not just athletes. This point of view would be way more realistic if these reasons were actually reasons for academics. These student athletes that Dennis A. Johnson (an editor for sports journalism) made the point that these student-athletes aren’t really students when it comes down to it. Between film room, weight training, practices, self-workouts, traveling, and finally competing in the game they play. So these student-athletes aren’t so many students as they are …show more content…
A distinction should be created whether or not or not the NCAA is in business to require advantage of xcapitalism and build cash. If no profits were taken, then the association would have associate argument against paying players. during a piece from the game Journal piece, the author points to Kahn’s argument that the NCAA acts sort of a trust in its actions. consistent with his study, in 2005 a draft prepared jock is value $495,000 and a draft prepared jock is value over $1.4 million to the NCAA severally.]This means the scholarship worth the player is receiving reciprocally for play is obscurity close to the player’s actual value to the varsity. This combined with the facts that players within the revenue sports receive no pay, and are restricted to once they will go skilled, exemplifies oppressive policy set forth by the association, in collusion with the skilled