Pros And Cons Of Media Censorship

Improved Essays
What Are the Pros and Cons of Media Censorship?

The limits that have been placed in this world, as far as are placed boundaries that have always been in place on the world, as far as media, communication and entertainment are concerned, are slowly lifting away. We now have the freedom to believe, think and say what we want. However, don’t you think there are some things that should be left unsaid? This is where the question about media censorship comes in; it is when things that are allowed to be published, televised or broadcasted are monitored by the government. This is done for various reasons, including the prevention of negative propaganda to spread. Though it is said to be implemented for good reasons, there are still many people saying
…show more content…
It is important to note that regulations can lead to more order, which is the ultimate goal of internet censorship.

List of Cons of Media Censorship

1. It keeps the ignorant, ignorant. If the government is put in control of what people are allowed to tune into, there is the tendency that things, which can expose corruption within the system, could not be viewed. This is an exploitable way to damage the people of a country.

2. It violates the First Amendment. Freedom of speech and press is implemented for a reason—it is what the US was formed around. And, putting into effect an excessive amount of media censorship can infringe on this on this basic right of the people. Also, censorship is believed to negate the First Amendment. What would be the point of your right to speak when there is nobody listening to what you are talking about? The very concept of censorship is believed to clash with the idea of democracy. By covering the ears of listeners, then democracy and dictatorship would be no

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In conclusion, legal procedures on defamation on social media should be taken because it can spread bad vibes to the society, disturb someone’s privacy and affect the future of someone. Lastly, to overcome this issue, the society needs to take precaution steps from doing defamatory statement by thinking carefully before posting an opinion on social media. The society also needs to avoid from accusing someone in committing immoral action that she or he has never…

    • 899 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The impede of freedom of speech, insight dictatorship, and the oppression of individuals causes society to become less emanate to the use of censorship due to the negative effects. The 1st amendment is used as protection of our rights but through media the government has limited the right by removing personal created content posted by individuals. Pro-dictatorship is seen as the government becoming the dictator restricting individuals of free speech on social and public media. Oppression is caused by censorship by limiting the news society…

    • 925 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Even Photographs were more impactful. The photographs were used to detect whoever went behind their backs. They were eventually spotted in those photos and were eventually arrested under their government standings. That shows how photos in journalism could play a big role. It could have a bad reputation showing how some groups don’t like to joke around under their constitution.…

    • 1046 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    He argues that the safety of our country relies heavily on the need for restrictions on our media to prevent terrorist attacks and to keep government secrets within the sanction of the country's borders. "Most important, the media should not enjoy the unfettered right to publish national security, intelligence, and military secrets." He strongly believes that in order to keep a peaceful and orderly government with practically guaranteed safety for its people, the media shouldn’t be able to publish all the information that they have access…

    • 1472 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Whether you’re a writer like Roger Rosenblatt discussing the right of freedom of speech but right place is key, or evaluating the root cause o censorship like writer Bryon Thompson does, we as a society are the ones who make those decisions. The ever changing society has this power. As Irving Kristol would say, the quality of life is where we determine those censorship lines will or will not be crossed. My opinion I am all for free speech, but limits on it are necessary. I think these limits are what makes us a somewhat of a civilized country.…

    • 1218 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As the prominence of technology increases, so does the censorship of it. The United States of America has many methods of concealing what is published online and to the rest of the world. As stated in the article “How Media Censorship Affects the News You See” by Glenn Halbrooks, the government controls many areas of media such as personal privacy, publishing graphic details and images, concealing security information, and hiding political bias. Although these restrictions may not immediately impact America negatively, this beginning step towards the censorship allows the Americans to become comfortable with the idea of it and therefore lay the foundation for the government to furthermore abuse the restrictions of what is displayed. In Legend by Marie Lu, the Republic also starts out small by making tiny adjustments and telling tiny lies to their citizens, but then later moves onto releasing propaganda on a larger scale and taking full control of what is publicly displayed.…

    • 788 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Private Media Bias

    • 1554 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In theory, the use of government funds eliminates the reliance on private investors, thus encouraging more accurate, unbiased news. However, this plan does have its critics. A government monopoly on the media would result in a limitation of freedom of speech and the government-run media sources would act as propaganda to control the citizens. Ultimately, while often intended to limit bias, history shows that government-run media organizations serve to limit freedom of speech and have drawbacks including the ability of the government to censor the information it distributes. To examine the benefits and drawbacks of public vs. private media it is necessary to define what each entails.…

    • 1554 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Censorship is the child of fear and the father of ignorance.” said Laurie Halse Anderson. Censorship is limiting access to information, ideas or books in order to prevent knowledge or freedom of thought. It suppresses writing or speech for moral, political, or security reasons. Bleeping out swear words in songs, changing the words to more kid friendly version, cutting out sections of a speech, or even just paraphrasing to avoid offending anyone can be considered censorship. Restricting people's freedom of speech is not only against the law, but it also limits access to information - no matter how sensitive the topic.…

    • 1377 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Essay On Prior Restraint

    • 1055 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In such circumstances, it is the role of the government to suppress those people and activities that would make people feel threatened by stating opinions that are out of line with commonly held beliefs. Also freedom of speech helps the world to change. Without this kind of expression, the world wouldn’t be aware of all the problems we have, and wouldn’t help to change them. For example, with the Charlie Hebdo problem going around the world and France got aware of the problem of religion, as well as Nelson Mandela. That kind of people broke the limit of speech and it helped to change life…

    • 1055 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The government will use the citizens as a means to end in order to invoke the censorship. This goes against the second categorical imperative of Kantianism. The citizens must be controlled in order to invoke the censorship; this can be achieved through controlling what they can or cannot post on their respective web outlets, forcing websites to monitor emails or other forms of communication, and also by obligating websites to control the content published by their users. By using the citizens in this manner, this infringes on several of the freedoms provided in the United States; namely, the citizen’s freedom of speech, right to privacy, and freedom of expression. (Shuwei, 2012) Thus, under Kantianism, censorship in the form of the CDA is unethical and should not be practiced.…

    • 1335 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays