Pros And Cons Of Marco Rubio

Imagine a world without America as the strongest and most powerful country. What if our government just collapsed, or we were taken over by other nations? Our country is declining, in many of the ways ancient civilizations like Rome did. There are people trying to run for office that would only make these problems worse. Our country needs a leader that is knowledgeable in foreign policies and knows how to run the military. They need to be a strong leader, and confident in the important things that founded our country. We need someone who can reform our economy and our everyday lives. Marco Rubio is the best choice for the president 2016 because he has a clear plan for the military and foreign policies, has good ideas about society, and has a good plan for our economy. …show more content…
He said his foreign policy would be based on one of his main ideas, to preserve U.S. strength. (Rubio, Marco “Restoring America”) To preserve our strength would mean expanding the military and protecting ourselves against terrorism and foreign attacks. Many ancient empires have fallen because of foreign groups of people attacking them and weakening their military. Many historians believe that one of the main causes of Rome’s fall was that their military was too weak and the invasions by barbarian tribe, nomads, or other groups. (Andrews, Evan) Leaders didn’t support the military as they should’ve or they didn’t have the money to do so. We don’t want to decline the way Rome did, so we need a leader who knows how to keep the US as the strongest, most powerful military and country in the