Staying In The European Union

Improved Essays
A British exit from the European Union may be on the horizon, however it will be a very difficult choice for Prime Minister David Cameron. A British exit has it’s pros and cons and if Britain 's choses to stay or leave the European Union will have the country divided, it seems as if staying in the European Union would be the smarter choice for many reasons. Staying in the European Union may have some financial benefits, but the overall freedom and happiness of the the British population will definitely not be very pleased if Britain is to stay as a member in the European Union. David Cameron stated that “ Over the longer term, the institutions and powers of the [Union] will continue to expand and certain policymaking powers heretofore vested …show more content…
A reason why this benefits trades is because “there could be truly free trade of goods and services across the borders of the member states.”(Doc 3) This is a positive for all member states but for Britain especially. Considering that Britain is not a landlocked country exporting and importing goods would be very expensive because those goods would have to be shipped overseas which doesn’t come at a cheap price. The fact that trade between the member states is free benefits Britain probably the most because they save a lot of money when exporting goods and that money can be put to areas that are in need of some financial help in Britain. Another reason why Britain should stay in the European Union is because “experts are waring of all kinds of economic risks of an EU exit from foreign investment to trade ties.”(Doc 2) If Britain is to exit and these risks do end up affecting Britain the county financially and considering that Britain is already in debt it doesn 't seem as if an EU exit would be the smartest choice for them. Nilan Peiris who is the Vice president of Transferwise which is a company that moves $750 million a month would not like to see Britain exit the European Union. For Transferwise to be located in many countries but most importantly Britain has many benefits mostly because while being located in Britain they also have access to the member states of the European Union. Having this access makes moving money very easy and cheap because member states in the European Union have free trade. Nilan Peiris said that “leaving the Eu would be a bit of a crazy idea in my opinion. We would have to seriously review our position in the U.K. and whether it made sense for us and our customers.”(Doc 2) In this statement it shows how companies would rather have Britain in the EU and of they were to leave the EU a lot of these companies

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Weather they are trading goods or services, trades can help countries by saving money, growing trade relationships, and helping them grow economically. Trade is important, whatever you trade, a country will never grow without the help and resources from the…

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    L01 Increasingly in recent times there have been questions raised as to whether the interests of the Scottish people would be better served closer to home. Some have argued for greater legislative powers to be transferred to Holyrood, whilst others instead see separation from the Union as being the key to meeting the needs of the people. This essay will examine these issues and more surrounding the governance of Scotland. When looking at what events were pivotal on the road to Scottish devolution, we should begin by looking at 1979.…

    • 2100 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nafta Pros And Cons

    • 666 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Moreover, if the United States employees chose to keep their jobs they had to accept them at a lower wage. In the end, free trade is the most logical form of financial collaboration. It allows free flowing communication and make it easy to develop exchange strategies. In addition, it opens job opportunities for all nations. When we choose to release the barriers of work development, the joint financial can extend to job opportunities.…

    • 666 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Many economists attest to the fact that austerity fails to reduce deficits and debts and during Cameron's reign, the financial position of U.K. was significantly worse. In comparison to other countries, U.K.'s economic performance was worse than that of France and particularly and many several countries in the European Union bloc. In the first two years, Cameron's government had worse numbers than Spain. It is evident that austerity serves no financial purpose. Its exists on the records that the Conservative Party needed to cut the welfare state with the aim of reducing taxes on the wealthy and for no other…

    • 802 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Postwar Tony Judt Summary

    • 1368 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Final Book Review Project, Postwar by Tony Judt Approaching the historic context of Europe since 1945 is generally not an easy task, but in the case of Tony Judt’s 2005 book, Postwar, he provides a strong interpretation of all the occurrences in this time period. Throughout his book, Judt is very efficient in tackling all of the issues that were important during these years, which would make Postwar a book that in general, can very effectively speak to the present generation of Europeans. The three issues that in the class I found more interesting and culturally important for modern day Europeans are: family/gay rights, unification of the European economy, and lastly the issues with immigration. I will use Judt’s book as evidence on how they…

    • 1368 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    We are now heading to a situation when severing these ties is a very real possibility. Leaving the EU is however a very dangerous prospect due to the potential for this to impact adversely on trade with the increasingly powerful EU economic block. It is noteworthy that 57% of all of the UK’s exports is with the EU. One of the major reasons for this is the free trade agreement between EU member countries, whereby EU member states reduce tariffs in order to encourage trade within the EU. As a recent report by the Center for Economic Performance concluded, the UK exiting the EU would result in substantially lower trade due to higher trade…

    • 962 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The first people is the old industrial working-class people, who traditionally voted for the British Labour Party. Those people regarded immigration, social change and globalisation as critical incident which affect threaten their life, and abandoned the Labour Party and voted for leaving EU. On the day of the vote, areas in the north-east England such as Sunderland and Newcastle where traditional working-class people live in, voted to leave the EU. David suggests two reasons why old industrial working-class areas voted to leave the EU.…

    • 84 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    By Using the Euro as the main currency among the EU members a decreased in trades was inevitable while both China and Germany benefited. Thus the author notes that…

    • 471 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Alas, despite the desire for some Europeans to create a United States of Europe, I do not believe this goal is feasible. European countries have unique histories and cultures that stretch back hundreds and even thousands of years. Competing cultures lead to conflict and eventually to war. Wars have occurred throughout European history, but not until the twentieth century did a war have the ability to totally reset the previous norms in Europe. The First World War infamously nicknamed “The War to end all Wars” occurred between 1914 and 1918.…

    • 438 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In conclusion, the UK constitution, which has been evolving for centuries, has made room for change. Though Dicey asserted the sovereignty of parliament as a fundamental principle in UK constitutional law, joining the EU has effectively turned that on its head. When the UK Parliament signed the European Communities Act in1972, they were aware that parliamentary sovereignty was something that they might have to give up; Article 2(1) of the act states that ”all such rights, powers, liabilities, obligations and restrictions from time to time arising by or under the Treaties ... are without further enactment to be given effect ... in the United Kingdom.” (cite) It is paradoxical; the UK has limited one of its key principles in constitutional law,…

    • 242 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Andre Spicer is a peer-reviewed source of credible information, but it should be noted that he has a vested interest in the results of Brexit, as he is a native of London. Clearly he wants his place of residence to be financially stable, and Brexit may have destabilized the UK for the time being. He also presents the flaw in academic research in his closing paragraphs. This could introduce distrust in his readers and weaken his overall argument. His, sometimes blunt, language may also dissuade readers from taking him seriously.…

    • 786 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Thus, countries will overall benefit from unrestricted trade in spite of the minor losses that may incur during specialization…

    • 1010 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Firstly, The European Union requires fund to run and the countries like Germany, France and the UK pay high fees because of its financial status and the fact that UK is contributing more to the EU budget than they get out of it means UK was being overcharged for membership. Nobody likes to get overcharged. Secondly, most of the decisions taken by the EU is considered to be controlled by Germany and are in its favor. Besides that, the European Commission decided that Europe would open the door to migrants from the Middle East which Britain didn’t want. If we see it from the economic point of view the Brexit is not a right decision.…

    • 992 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Free trade comes with many benefits and sacrifices. Our current international trade debate is highly divisive, with different people arguing from different perspectives. Some argue that free trade is economically beneficial for all trading economies and consumers, while others focus on the negative job impact and social cost of free trade. Benjamin…

    • 1438 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    That 's despite desperate government efforts to privatize public assets, cut work forces and reduce spending on public services, so there 's essentially nowhere to raise money in a crisis situation without implementing austerity measures that would rival the Great Depression in the United States. Another big worry is that most of the economy is fueled by technology and digital services that could easily disappear when basic services like food production and manufacturing no longer comprise most of the world 's economic output. Brexit could easily trigger economic pandemonium by forcing the European Union to allow its members to write off debt to prevent further defections. This could trigger a catastrophic meltdown in the $500 trillion derivatives market and pop the $100 trillion debt bubble in a situation that mirrors 2008 and the Lehman bankruptcy’s chain of…

    • 803 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays