Pros And Cons Of Government Surveillance Programs

Superior Essays
While some may argue that government surveillance programs are necessary to insure public safety, to allow the infringement of the rights guaranteed by the US Constitution is too high a price to pay. September 11, 2001 should not be just remembered as the beginning of America’s “War on Terrorism,” it should also be remembered as being the first “cybersecurity war.” The terrorists who had used the internet for their recruitment, and communications, on many occasions, were subsequently identified, were hacked by counter-terrorist computer specialists of the CIA and the National Security Agency. Upon October 26, 2001 the United States Congress passed the Patriot Act. This law authorized both civilian and military counterterrorism agencies the …show more content…
When you do anything on Facebook a metadata event happens, and with the help of an algorithm to get you to buy a product. The Facebook algorithm also goes through your browser's cookie which records your metadata and uses what you’ve looked at to sell you products you might be interested. James Clapper, the National Security Agency Director for President Obama assured the United States Congress on March 12, 2013, that the government was not engaged in accessing the computer records of private citizens, and there was no evidence this had ever happened. He was lying. Edward Snowden didn’t just share his information about the US government’s PRISM program with The Guardian. He posted the evidence online for all the world to see. The main on line documents proving that metadata mining by the government took place are “PRISM / US-984XN” and they detail how the NSA deputized companies to collect the metadata of their user’s. All of this was done in the name of safety after the events of September 11th. The question remains did any of this make Americans safer? President Obama claimed 54 terrorist attacks were stopped by the mass surveillance of US citizens: This is just not true. A report from the nonprofit journalism organization ProPublica debunked this claim in an article written by Justin Elliott, and Theodoric Meyer. In their article: “Claim on “Attacks Thwarted” by NSA Spreads, Despite Lack of Evidence” both Mr. Elliott and Meyer found that these claims had little to no basis in reality and that NSA Chief Keith Alexander at a tech securities conference held in Las Vagus in July 2013 made this claim with no evidence. He simply stated this claim during his slide presentation, and later repeated this claim in a letter to NSA employees, which claimed that PRISM metadata surveillance “contributed to keeping the U.S. and its allies safe from 54 terrorist plots.” (Alexander). The NSA did not respond when asked to authenticate

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Post 9/11 Privacy Rights: The Case Against Electronic Surveillance In response to concerns about terrorism after the attacks on September 11,2001, the government of the United States enacted new guidelines for conducting surveillance on the public. This paper will discuss the implementation of electronic surveillance as a tool to combat terrorism and will make the case against sweeping electronic surveillance of American citizens and others in this country. Various examples of increased surveillance along with decreasing privacy right will help the reader to conclude that these tactics have not reduced incidents of any type of crime, including terrorism. This paper will also discuss several types of electronic surveillance, including the collection of metadata from telephone records, which intruded on the private lives of citizens and did not increase their safety in any meaningful way.…

    • 1377 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Patriot Act Dbq

    • 967 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Following the attacks that occurred on 9/11, the United States government established the Patriot Act. The Patriot Act was put into place to ensure the safety of the citizens of the United States by enhancing the security of the country. The act revised the nation’s surveillance laws, expanding the government’s authority to look into the records of citizens. This law also reduced the judicial oversight, public accountability and the ability to challenge government searches in court. These alterations and additions to the surveillance of the United States was said to ensure the safety of the people from ever having to experience any terrorist attack like the one that happened on 9/11.…

    • 967 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    9/11 Cons

    • 1401 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Throughout the twenty-first century, domestic terrorism has grown into an important issue in the United States. After the infamous terrorist attacks of September 11th, 2001, the federal government of the United States has placed a much larger emphasis on homeland security and preventing terrorism. On October 2, 2001, the Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001 (USA PATRIOT) was introduced in an attempt to improve homeland security. The USA PATRIOT Act of 2001 should not have passed because it violates the Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, intrudes upon the First Amendment of the Constitution, but passed because of the widespread fear of terrorism across…

    • 1401 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    NSA warrantless surveillance controversy Introduction The NSA warrantless surveillance controversy concerns with the surveillance of people within the United States. It all started while the collection of allegedly foreign intelligence by the U.S. National Security Agency (NSA) was going on as part of the war on terror. The National Security Agency is one of America's largest intelligence organizations. It is similar to the FBI and CIA.…

    • 1695 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As of May 5, 2004, atleast 310 defendants have been charged with criminal offenses as a result of terrorism investigations since the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, and 179 of those defendants have already been convicted. Many criminals have been caught and charged with terrorism, and in turn lives have been saved. Was the privacy of those criminals looked into, and taken advantage of? Yes, yes it was. Were many innocent lives saved as a result?…

    • 695 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    9/11 Cons

    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Since the government is invading our privacy it’s like having them watching our every move and constantly looking through our photo’s, Facebook messages, and text messages. For example when the FBI wanted Apple to unlock a terrorist phone so that they could look at the text messages. Apple informed the FBI that if they unlock that phone then they would be forced to unlock all of the phones. If they did this then hackers or the government could get a hold of something they don't need to know about. The government need to stop invading our privacy because if something gets leaked it could cost the government a lot of money or ruin someone’s life.…

    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    9/11 Ethical Dilemmas

    • 1132 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The attacks on September 11, 2001 instilled great fear in the government as well as millions of Americans. In order to protect ourselves and prevent future terrorists attacks, President George W. Bush signed a bill called The USA Patriot Act which allowed government agencies such as The National Security Agency access to anything they needed to intercept acts of terrorism. The NSA then gained the power to wiretap individual’s phones,obtain their business records and spy on anyone they deemed could be suspected of terrorism. It was a time of panic for the United States, and these excessive searches without warrants weren’t given a second thought. However, it is now 2014 and citizen’s privacy is still being compromised more than ever without…

    • 1132 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The NSA’s primary way of fighting terrorism, as previously noted, was through the collection and surveillance of every citizens’ communications data – known as “The Program” according to the documentary. However, not only is “The Program” unconstitutional and illegal, it has also proven to be less than helpful in contributing to the counter-terrorism efforts. While several top government officials – including President Obama, former President George W. Bush, former Vice President Cheney, former NSA Chief Michael Hayden, and others – claim that many threats have been averted thanks to “The Program,” a report found, according to Anna Mulrine, that “traditional investigative methods, such as the use of informants, tips from local communities, and targeted intelligence operations, provided…for investigations in the majority of cases, while the contribution of NSA’s bulk surveillance programs to these cases was minimal…playing an identifiable role in initiating, at most, 1.8 percent of these cases” (Mulrine, Anna). She goes on, with a quote from a source saying “’it can’t justify the gathering of these millions of records when it can be done another way where the government doesn’t have to obtain all of that information’” (Mulrine, Anna).…

    • 2021 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The events of September 11, 2001 will never be forgotten by the American people. One of the largest changes made in the United States after 9/11 was the introduction of the USA Patriot Act on October 26, 2001. The act allows US government agencies to easily gain access to the private records of people within the United States. The records include phone records, banking statements, and credit reports. Without any limits on the power of government agencies, the possibility of infringing on the rights of private citizens arises.…

    • 564 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Edward snowden is a computer professional that is famously known for leaking information on the U.S. National Security Agency in 2013. Snowden said in an interview that “ The NSA has built an infrastructure that allows it to intercept almost everything that is uses telecommunications.”(www.cfr.org). This infrastructure collects data all around the United States. This is private information that is being collected without our consent or a warrant being present. The Obama Administration defended the surveillance program saying “ it 's legal, limited and effective with preventing terrorist acts” (www.cfr.org).…

    • 1280 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Patriot Act Essay

    • 1113 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The patriot act allows the government the right to check and monitor technology for the purpose of preventing terrorist activities. However, the government could be doing more than just preventing the act of terrorism. This act can also be referred to as, ‘Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate…

    • 1113 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    National security vs personal privacy has been a hot topic post-9/11. President Obama gave a speech on January 17, 2014 where he stated “in our rush to respond …. , the risk of government overreach – the possibility that we lose some of our core liberties in pursuit of security – also became more pronounced.” (Office of the Press Secretary) Due to the tragic event on September 11th, 2001, our government was placed under extraordinary pressures to find the terrorists and bring them to justice using whatever means possible. This brings around questions regarding ethical dilemmas as they relate to security and our right to privacy.…

    • 978 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Importance Of The NSA

    • 1376 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The center on law and security (2007) states, “Critics of the NSA program do not necessarily object to the type of surveillance, but rather to the way in which it has been authorized, and to the absence of any oversight”…

    • 1376 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Snowden looked at and studied every document before deciding on what to release. Unlike past leaks, he did not put it onto Wiki Leaks or upload them to the Internet. The U.S. government collected information on millions of Americans that were not linked to terrorism in any way. The U.S. also collects information on other countries, even allies (New Yorker). Since 9/11 there has been an increase in spying with the agencies and committees that are meant to be monitoring the activities of the spying agencies who are not enforcing anything; so, the NSA was…

    • 1076 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Whereas constitutionality of government surveillance is questionable, these laws, along with the countless other sections and statutes in and related to the PATRIOT Act, permit government agencies, under scrutiny, of course, to conduct surveillance to protect our country from terrorist threats and…

    • 1195 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays