Pros And Cons Of Genetic Modification

Improved Essays
When it comes to the topic of genetic modification, there is a debate whether or not it should be allowed. Where this agreement usually ends, however, is on whether or not science should be able to improve human life. Whereas some are convinced that genetic modification can help cure diseases, others maintain that it should not be used to enhance a child’s abilities. My own view, however is that genetic modification should be allowed whether it is used to modify or enhance a human life. Whether it is to enhance your child’s abilities or make their children prone to a disease people should be given the rights to help their children abilities. David Koepsell a professor of philosophy at the State University of New York at Buffalo agrees that …show more content…
Jeffrey Scott Coker a professor of biology at Elon University in North Carolina states, “genetic engineering is actually as natural as any process on earth, and mastering it would enable us to do what microbes do trillions of times every day, but purposefully and with better results” (Coker). Basically, Coker is saying that even though genetic enhancement isn’t been used children still feel unequal to each other. When someone has a great talent to perform a certain type of activity, it is easy to say because they were born lucky. When children are asked to choose their groups in school, they always seem to choose the smarter and much intelligent individual. The ones who were born not so lucky to have the talent of been the smarter or more athletic always get left out. With genetic enhancement no longer will this be a problem, not only will genetic modification help children’s abilities, but it will also help parents conceive healthier …show more content…
A prominent bioethicist by the name of John Harris states, “Given the lengths, many parents will go to seek the best educational opportunities and social advantages for their children, why not instead achieve the desired qualities, such as enhanced intelligence, better health and fitness” (Campbell). In other words, if parents have the right to choose whether or not they want to conceive a child, they should also have the right to choose their child’s abilities. When a child is born with a disease some parents will go to every extent to try to cure their child. Genetic modification will help parents have a healthy baby, no longer will parents have to be worried about their children been born with a certain type of disease. Genetic engineering could also help parents chose their children’s abilities by enhancing them to become smarter, and more

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    If it's acceptable to modify one gene, why not two, or 20 or 200? At what point do children become artifacts designed to someone's specifications rather than members of a family to be nurtured? Given what we know about human nature, the development and commercial marketing of human genetic modification would likely spark a techno-eugenic rat-race. Even parents opposed to manipulating their children's genes would feel compelled to participate in this race, lest their offspring be left behind.”…

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    One controversial topic that provokes debate is genetic modification. In the essay “Proposed Treatment to Fix Genetic Diseases Raises Ethical issues” the author Rob Stein explains the process of genetic engineering and suggests a solution. The government is debating if the should let scientists “make changes in some of the genetic material” in the egg so the baby will not have certain genes. The main goal is to “help women deliver healthy, normal children.” There are some risks with this process such as birth defects.…

    • 369 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In a study titled “Public and Scientists’ Views on Science and Society,” by Pew Research Center, eighty three percent of people thought that genetic modification for babies to make the baby more intelligent was inappropriate and that it was taking medical advances way to far. (Figure 2) However, people were split on the topic of genetic modification to remove diseases. The importance of this information is that it underlines that a majority of people are not okay with genetically enhancing traits in a baby as it would give it an advantage in the world that many others would not have. The information also allows us to see that genetic modification to remove diseases is something might be favorable and not looked down upon by society.…

    • 1645 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gattac Designer Babies

    • 891 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Designer babies are here! In the film GATTACA designer babies are created so that humans could be healthier. Parents that do choose to modify their offsprings should only change or choose the desired body features. Is it okay for people to genetically change their babies? Many people such as myself believe that no its not okay…

    • 891 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The development of this technology will lead to a society gap between those who are genetically enhanced and those who have “natural genes”. Additionally, this manipulation will also deprive a child from its natural rights and will cause hardships in the future. Lastly, genetic engineering has the potential of ending the life of the embryo due to its relatively new technology. This manipulation of genes will result in catastrophic outcomes that will harm…

    • 613 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    By going ahead with gene modification this would allow us to know more about our genetic makeup, our weaknesses and our strengths. So, instead of diminishing our freedom it would give us the freedom of knowing more of what we are able to do and what we cannot do. The third concern is the fear that our social division will widen as the “affluent ‘buy’ more competitive abilities for their offspring” (Green 2). This could be catastrophic, however Green focused more on the positive side of things and states that this could also be “a tool for reducing the class divide” (Green 3). The fourth and final concern that Green addresses is religion and how this…

    • 967 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Walter Glannon explores several moral problems with genetic enhancement in his article “Genetic Enhancement,” published in Glannon’s book, From Genes and Future people: Philosophical Issues in Human Genetics (and later in Bioethics Principles, Issues, and Cases.) Glannon believes that “gene therapy is permissible if it is intended to ensure or restore normal functions, but it is morally illegitimate if it is aimed at enhancing functions beyond normal.” (577) Glannon, a professor of bioethics and philosophy at the University of Calgary, holds the Canada Research Chair in Biomedical Ethics and Ethical Theory at the University of Calgary in Alberta. He is well known for publishing 4 books and over 27 articles related to bioethics and philosophy.…

    • 508 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Today, there are more thoughts about allowing parents to bioengineer their children. Instead of relying on fate to see how their baby turns out, some people want the power to genetically modify their kids before birth. For example, if a parent wanted a tall boy, they could predetermine this. Contrastingly, Michael Sandel argues bioengineering because again, it takes away the giftedness of children. He explains, “To appreciate children as gifts is to accept them as they come, not as objects of our design, or products of our will, or instrument of our ambition,” (45).…

    • 1789 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Designer Babies Imagine a society where kids grew up in a defect-free environment. Even if the technology that would create this seems distant, geneticists are actively researching it and there’s even a term for children that could be genetically modified. They’re called designer babies and could revolutionize the effects impairments have on our society. However, this new project could also have a negative effect on our society as well, such as the unsure success rate of the procedure. The use of this technology is a double edged sword, but I believe it could help create a more nourishing environment for youth for every child to thrive.…

    • 540 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “At what point do children become artifacts designed to someone’s specifications rather than members of a family to be nurtured? (Hayes 245).” In “Genetically Modified Humans? No Thanks,” Richard Hayes argues against Ronald M. Green, a professor of Emeritus of Religion and of Ethics and Human Values at Dartmouth College, specifically responding to his essay about using genetic technology to change children’s DNA. Hayes, who holds a Ph.D. in Energy and Resource, which saluted the United States to ban human cloning worldwide, believes it would disrupt human nature and the human future.…

    • 961 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The ethics of gene manipulation proposes a rather complex debate because of opposing religious/individual takes on this issue. My position on this issue is “in-between” because this could be a fantastic advancement at rescuing a family from a harmful genetic disease passing on and advances in genetic engineering have and still could enable an abundance of people with infertility problems to start a family. Although, the negative impacts of gene manipulation remain vital, it violates a child’s autonomy by selecting a future for him/her and it leads to great social inequalities. Gene manipulation could be a fantastic advancement at rescuing a family from a harmful genetic disease passing on to their offspring.…

    • 292 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    First, genetically altering our offspring would change their emotional, physical, and mental characteristics. Just by manipulating genes, this is all possible, but should it be done? Everyone would like for their child to be intellectual, good-looking, and athletic.…

    • 549 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The next objection is based on human autonomy and how enhancement strips the right of that. Our autonomy is based on a personal rule of self that is free from outside opinions or controlling interferences. This idea allows every person to have their own mind set without someone controlling every decision they make. When a child starts to grow up they start to become interested in certain things, whether it is sports or dance or even art. Once the child really becomes their own self they will arbitrate the things they like and dislike.…

    • 1808 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Some believe that giving parents the option of genetically engineering their baby will result in eugenics driven by egoism. People might take advantage of germline manipulation by creating embryos that will be their own idea of what is perfect, thus objectifying and commodifying children. Some opposers even say that because these embryos will not have a say in whether they want to be modified or not, their rights will be taken away. Furthermore, regulating laws ensuring that genetic modification is used only for the correction of genuinely medical genetic conditions as opposed to enhancing a child’s appearance will be nearly impossible. Rich parents will use…

    • 1677 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As it states in Source A “ Even without a ban, it will be upper-class parents who can afford pricey genetic technologies. “ this evidence shows that if their was no limits to genetic engineering then the rich people would become even more elite because not only would they have money but they also would not be plagued with the common genetic disease that the rest of the population would have to deal with. Also in Source A it states “Sooner or later, as the most glaring genetic liabilities will drift toward the bottom of the socioeconomic scale,” This evidence shows that as time goes by the genetic problems such as ADHD would only affect the people who are lower class. If the people of lower class are plagued with these genetic diseases that the rich aren 't’ then not only will the rich have more money than the poor they will also be healthier. Also the rich also have more money to pay to fix issues that are caused by…

    • 1643 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays