Essay On Exclusionary Rule

Improved Essays
One of the most controversial, and perhaps,most important American legal principle, is the exclusionary clause which under Constitutional law, holds that evidence collected or analyzed in violation of defendants constitutional rights is not permitted for use in criminal persecutions. Sparked by the famous case Mapp v. Ohio, the exclusionary rule has a fair share of critics who argue that police blunders let criminals go free. In the 1961 Supreme Court case, Dollree Mapp was convicted when police searched her house ,under a false warrant, for a suspected bomb fugitive and found “lewd, lavicious, or obscene material”, otherwise known as pornography. Mapp claimed the police had no probable cause to search for the obscene materials found; the Court let her go because the material had been seized without a warrant. Despite the occasional occurrence of criminals going free, the exclusionary rule is vital to democracy because the principle ensures liberty and justice in America for all. The exclusionary rule works with the Fourth and Fifth Amendments to protect the people from law enforcement overstepping their boundaries. Security is crucial to human performance. In order for democracy to function correctly, the people must feel safe. The Fourth Amendment works to build American sense of security by protecting …show more content…
The Constitution create legal guidelines for the nation to follow when the police force abuses their power. Combined with the Fourth and Fifth Amendment, the exclusionary rule ensures that all people are treated with the dignity and respect that defines out nation. Our nation has evolved much since the time of Writs of Assistance by learning about the importance of due process of law that keeps even the highest officials grounded. Despite the criticism that criminals are let off free, the exclusionary clause ensures liberty and justice by enforcing rights of the

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Rehnquist delivered the opinion of the 7-2 majority. The Court held that the Supreme Court has jurisdiction to review cases from state courts that deal primarily with federal law. The Court also held that the Fourth Amendment was designed to protect against intrusions into a home or onto private property, or the conduct of police officers. The exclusionary rule therefore does not apply to the conduct of judicial officers. Justice Sandra Day O’Connor wrote a concurring opinion where she argued that the majority’s decision does not allow any evidence that is the result of a clerical error.…

    • 390 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The United States Constitution’s 11th amendment also states that an officer must show that they had probable cause in order to have lawsuits brought against them dismissed. In situations involving police use of excessive force the 11th amendment; protections have had multiple successes due to death caused by a police officer. A majority of cases heard regarding probable cause often lead to a dismissal of charges, but the penalty is usually in monetary form as an end result of a lawsuit. The 11th amendment granted diversity jurisdiction to the federal courts, allowed lawsuits between a State and Citizens of another State called, Sovereign Immunity. The law is ethical and morally correct, but not successful in assuring police are charged…

    • 276 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    cases also relates to the Fourth Amendment, which requires "search and seizure" of evidence, also known as the exclusionary rule (Srinivas, 2012, p. 179). The exclusionary rule states that, “Evidence must be collected and analyzed without violating the rights of the defendant; if the rights of the defendant are violated, then the evidence will not be upheld in court” (Srinivas, 2012, p. 179). Savana Redding is a 13-year-old eighth grader enrolled at Safford Middle School. She is an honor student who has no history of disciplinary problems or substance abuse.…

    • 628 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Elizabeth, I do concede that Dripps model of the contingent exclusionary rule is fascinating; yet, it is my opinion that there are pros and cons. It is without doubt that the present exclusionary rule is controversial. I also concede that there isn’t a need to completely re-invent the wheel. Conversely, Dripps argues in regards of the contingent suppression order in which prosecutors would have to choose between accepting exclusion of evidence obtained through infractions of the Fourth Amendment or accepting the imposition of a damages judgment obtained through infractions of the Fourth Amendment or accepting the imposition of a damages judgment against the state under an administration of statutory damages (Tipton, 2010).…

    • 328 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    United States. In this case, the court ruled 5-3, declaring that the government’s ability to freeze a defendant 's non-tainted assets during a trial violated the constitution. This is relevant because the court reasoned that without access to proper funds, a defendant might not be able to provide themselves with adequate counsel for their trial. In Glossip v. Gross, the Supreme Court affirmed in a divided 5-4 judgement that the burden of proof required to classify Oklahoma’s use of midazolam, a sedative, as cruel and unusual punishment had indeed not been met. These recent instances of the Constitution’s interpretation have shed an ever growing light on how the American justice system works and the continuing understanding of the United States Constitution.…

    • 1252 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One of the most commonly known amendments are those that are considered part of the Bill of Rights. However, one of the most important amendment that every citizen should know is the Fourth Amendment. This Amendment is broken in three parts that imply that people should have the right to be secure in and of their property, no warrants should be issued without any unreasonable cause and that if there is a warrant, then they should specify the place and people of search. Many citizens do not completely understand this amendment to the extent to exercise this right.…

    • 722 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Question 1: Discuss the arguments for and against the exclusionary rule. Be sure to provide examples and explain your position on the exclusionary rule. Answer: The exclusionary rule is “A judicial rule that makes evidence obtained in violation of the U.S. Constitution, state, or federal laws, or court rules inadmissible” (Gardner & Anderson, 2016, p. 214).…

    • 820 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Is drug testing of students who participate in extracurricular activities permitted under the fourth amendment? fourth amendment states that a person has the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized. Meaning that the people are protected from unreasonable searches and seizures by the government while it does not guarantee against all searches and seizures, only those the law deems unreasonable. Which is determined by the balance of two important interests being…

    • 523 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    (Neubauer & Fradella, 2015) The four amendments of the Bill of Right that deal with criminal procedure protect citizens. The Fourth Amendment states that the law enforcement cannot arrest a citizen or search his or her property unless there is probable cause. The Fifth Amendment…

    • 1229 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Fourth Amendment

    • 752 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Amendment IV The fourth amendment is one of the primitive and mainly significant entitlements bestowed to the citizens of The United State of America; the law, distinctively states, “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.” What Does the Fourth Amendment Mean? The Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution stipulates, the entitlement of individuals to be secure in their individualities, dwellings, documents, and possessions, against irrational searches…

    • 752 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It is common for a search to be defined as any action by government officials, which involves seeking for indication of a violation of law. Nonetheless, according to the Court’s cases, a search ensues when there is a physical invasion into one of the “constitutionally protected areas” which can be associated with the Fourth Amendment: persons, papers and effects (Whitebread and Slobogin, 120). Silverman vs United States (1961) exemplify how searches have conditions. Evidence officers gathered by…

    • 490 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Arizona can also be put into the frame of judicial activism. The Supreme Court created a new law, bypassing the elected legislative branch of government, in order to protect the rights of the accused. The law that requires police to read the defendant the “Miranda Rights” not only helps to protect the defendant from self-incrimination under duress, but it also reduces police violence and other forms of intimidation that could lead to a false confession. The new law protects the rights of the accused and changes the behavior of the police towards arrests and interrogations, reconciling growing police powers with individual basic…

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mapp v. Ohio, after reading the case file this case should not have ever made it to the Supreme Court or any court in the land. This case was doomed from the beginning due to police misconduct that has opened a crack in a door for criminals to slide through. Should the exclusionary rule be abolished? I do believe that court’s ruling regarding Mapp v. Ohio affect the day-to-day police work of our Officers. Peradventure, that the police are serving a legal warrant to pick up robbery suspect who also is a known drug dealer, because of the exclusionary rule from Mapp v. Ohio when the police arrive at the suspect address, they are not allow to search the home looking for drugs unless the warrant stipulates.…

    • 598 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Powell V. Alabama Case

    • 808 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, and Eighth Amendments were established to protect the rights of the suspected, the accused, criminal defendants and that of convicted criminals. There have been several instances of the course time where these protections of rights haven’t been upheld. An example of when these protections of rights have been neglected is the Powell v. Alabama in 1932. There are several things that made this particular case so different from that of other cases. The time period, the series of events in the case, and the doctrines that were established during this time period are just a few to mention.…

    • 808 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays