ere it ends up” (Christy). This is loosely interpreted to mean that researchers try to trace the routes of poachers; however, it is too much work and requires too many people without the promise of success. Therefore, it may be easier to let the poachers continue with what they have been doing.
Everyone knows that elephants are eventually going to die, every living creature does. They may become too old or their habitat may not contain enough resources to support them. So, if the elephants are going to die anyway, why does it matter if poachers kill them a little earlier and then use their ivory for benefit? Forbes states in its article When You Ban the Sale of Ivory, You Ban Elephants that “Elephant poaching is rampant throughout Africa. …show more content…
Does it really affect everyone on the planet, or is it limited to the countries with decreasing elephant populations? A review of the evidence reveals that elephants are as capable of emotion as humans, and if we continue this unnecessary killing, our value system needs to be questioned. If we are to prevent this senseless murder, maybe we also need to inform the poachers of the consequences of their actions. But some people believe that as it stands, the ivory trade, illegal poaching, and a proposed ban on the ivory trade are really not issues at all and are not worthy of further discussion. Taking into account the environmental effects of an increased elephant population, the difficulty of enforcing legislation and catching the poachers, and the loss of ivory trade regulation fees, it is a foregone conclusion that the ivory hunters should be allowed to continue to do their job which has more positive consequences than previously thought. According to The New York Times article Sri Lanka Destroys Illegal Elephant Tusks, the country has “sought to differentiate itself from its predecessor by sending a powerful message of intolerance for elephant poaching.” The article reveals that some places in the world are no longer tolerating the poaching of elephants. Hopefully, this decision will be
Everyone knows that elephants are eventually going to die, every living creature does. They may become too old or their habitat may not contain enough resources to support them. So, if the elephants are going to die anyway, why does it matter if poachers kill them a little earlier and then use their ivory for benefit? Forbes states in its article When You Ban the Sale of Ivory, You Ban Elephants that “Elephant poaching is rampant throughout Africa. …show more content…
Does it really affect everyone on the planet, or is it limited to the countries with decreasing elephant populations? A review of the evidence reveals that elephants are as capable of emotion as humans, and if we continue this unnecessary killing, our value system needs to be questioned. If we are to prevent this senseless murder, maybe we also need to inform the poachers of the consequences of their actions. But some people believe that as it stands, the ivory trade, illegal poaching, and a proposed ban on the ivory trade are really not issues at all and are not worthy of further discussion. Taking into account the environmental effects of an increased elephant population, the difficulty of enforcing legislation and catching the poachers, and the loss of ivory trade regulation fees, it is a foregone conclusion that the ivory hunters should be allowed to continue to do their job which has more positive consequences than previously thought. According to The New York Times article Sri Lanka Destroys Illegal Elephant Tusks, the country has “sought to differentiate itself from its predecessor by sending a powerful message of intolerance for elephant poaching.” The article reveals that some places in the world are no longer tolerating the poaching of elephants. Hopefully, this decision will be