The US Chief Justice System

Improved Essays
A chief justice is the name of a presiding judge, which is in federal appeals and state court, the judge that chairs the panel of 3 or more judges during hearings and supervises the business of a court having several members. The US Supreme Court has a chief justice and eight associate justices who sit together as a panel. The General Assembly can increase the number of Associate Justices, but to no more than eight. If the chief justices are unable to perform any of the duties that they need to complete, that is when the senior associate available will step in and complete the tasks for the chief justice. If you want to become a chief justice you do not have to have been an associate justice. To be a chief justice you have to be appointed …show more content…
They hear cases regarding federal laws, federal constitutional issues, and crimes punishable under both federal and state law and many more. The justices decide what cases they want to hear and they usually are cases addressing constitutional issues or federal law. For cases to get to the US Supreme Court parties who are not satisfied with the decision of a lower court have to petition the Supreme Court to hear their case. By doing that, you have ask to grant a writ of certiorari. The jurisdiction is up to the US Supreme Court; they decide and have the authority to hear a case. There are 4 types of jurisdiction and the US Supreme Court uses all (“Supreme Court Justices”). They are exclusive jurisdiction, concurrent jurisdiction, original jurisdiction and appellate jurisdiction. The chief justice leads a conference with a discussion relating to the case by reviewing case facts and the lower court decisions. If the US Supreme Court does not pick a case that was reviewed the vote from the lower court stands. In the US Supreme Court, there is no evidence presented or no witnesses. Each side has 30 minutes to present oral arguments which are opportunities for lawyers to summarize their position before the court and they are interrupted by the …show more content…
The first way is by writing an opinion. There are 3 major types of opinions made by Federal and State Supreme Courts but a majority opinion affects a case the most. A majority opinion is a statement that presents the views of the majority of the Supreme Court justices regarding a case. This opinion is usually written by the chief justice but other justices can write it. A majority opinion states the facts of the case, announces the ruling and explains court reasoning. The majority opinion is important because it defines the precedent that all the future cases hearing a similar case should follow. By writing this opinion the chief justice can affect the outcome of a case because if they’re going over the facts of a case, reading it over they might have a positive feeling or a negative feeling about what they want to decide. When explaining the ruling or verdict, the court explains why they ruled what they did. By doing that everyone can know what made them choose their verdict. When choosing a verdict you focus on what you think is important and what thing makes you want to vote positively or negatively about the case. Having odd number of justice’s help as well because that gives a lead when you vote, lots of votes can be 9-0 or 5-4. Another opinion is a concurring opinion, this is where there is a justice who agrees with the majority but he or she agrees for different reasons and the purpose

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Judicial Review I believe having a Supreme Court is valuable for any democracy to maintain fairness between governmental power and the rights of citizens. However, with a court that wields such authority, the justices serving these courts must be appointed in a manner that represents a balance in political ideology. Moreover, if multiple appointments are made to the Supreme Court by a president and congress of one political persuasion, the court’s rulings can overwhelmingly favor a particular political party’s ideology. Balanced judicial appointments create balanced rulings in most cases. This neutrality can be disrupted by political influence as evidenced in recent rulings.…

    • 754 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    1. The Supreme Court decisions in a case affect significantly the entire country’s legal system. Therefore, models of judicial decision making were created to explain the Supreme Court’s behavior and how they influence policies. While the legal, attitudinal and the strategic model are not the only theories of judicial decision making, those constitute the most prevalent hypotheses to explain judicial decisions.…

    • 1172 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    America stands for justice, nevertheless, equality but the Judicial Branch possess an amount power over Congress that overshadows this statement. The Judicial Branch consists of three levels; the District Courts, Court of Appeals and uppermost power, the Supreme Court. Despite the fact that the Senate and Executive branch have the choice of who maintains the position of Supreme Court Justices, the Supreme Court still has the ability to subdue the other branches. Revealed in the United States Constitution, Chief Justice John Marshall’s majority decision, in addition to a 2005 Political cartoon, it is evident that the Supreme Court subjugates the Executive and Legislative Branch.…

    • 870 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1) Legal 2) Attitudinal 3) Strategic With the vague words of the constitution and these 3 models this is how the Supreme Court justices are to make decisions. 1) The legal aspect of the decision-making is strictly based on the facts, laws & precedent.…

    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The U.S. Supreme Court is the highest federal court in America. The court consists of The Chief Justice of the U.S. with eight associate judges all nominated by the President of the U.S. They evaluate laws according to and try cases pertaining to the Constitution. The hierarchy under the U.S. Supreme Court is Appellate Courts, Trial Courts, and Federal Courts and boards outside of the Judicial Branch. The Supreme Court rules whether or not it is permitted under the Constitution.…

    • 789 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It has many courts but its highest court is the Supreme Court. It decides whether something is unconstitutional or constitutional. The Supreme Court is made up of nine justices or judges, eight are associate justices and one is the Chief Justice. The judges are chosen/appointed by the president but they have to be approved by the Senate. The Chief Justice also swears the president into office.…

    • 572 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Rule Of Four Summary

    • 768 Words
    • 4 Pages

    During this reading, I was intrigued by the process a particular case must undergo to be considered by the justices of the Supreme Court. As petitions of certiorari, clerks examine them before any judge will see them. If they fulfill the criteria, the cases will then go into what is known as the cert pool - a collection of petitions that the justices split amongst themselves for individual examination. After, if said cases are considered noteworthy by the justices, they make it onto the discuss list. As the final checkpoint, the judges vote on whether or not to hear the case - following the Rule of Four, which requires a minimum of four justices to vote affirmatively to see the case.…

    • 768 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Warren court was a time full of life changing events, whether they were good or bad they affected everyone. Changes were being made quite frequently to civil rights, judicial and federal powers. The Warren court was known for several different things such as: ending racial segregation, putting a stop to prayer in public schools, making the right to privacy very clear through the constitution, and much, much more. Without the Warren court, there is no say on how the United States would be right now. The background of the court is about as important as what happened during the years that it took place.…

    • 1381 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Dual Court System

    • 218 Words
    • 1 Pages

    The type of court structure we have in the United States is a dual court system. This means that every state has its own judicial system, that’s separate from the federal system, which is the same for every state. The state court includes trial courts of Limited Jurisdiction, Trial Court of General Jurisdiction, Intermediate Courts of Appeals, and the Appellate Court for a last resort. The Federal Court System includes District COurts, Circuit Courts of Appeals, and the Supreme COurt of the United States.…

    • 218 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Supreme Court Cases

    • 621 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Through the Constitution, there is clear evidence of how the Supreme Court is organized, how they are given the jurisdiction to hear cases, and what powers are given to them. We see first how the law of DOMA was ruled unconstitutional by the Supreme Court against Congress. DOMA was unconstitutional because of the Judiciary Act of 1789, which states that "judicial power of the United States, shall be vested in one Supreme Court, and such inferior Courts". To expand on this subject, this is changed when the case Marbury v. Madison takes place. In the Marbury v. Madison case, where judicial review came from (the Judiciary Act decided how many people would be in Supreme Court, and the court system underneath them), Supreme Court declared the Judiciary Act…

    • 621 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Duel Court System

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages

    As the highest court in the United States, the Supreme Court has the lawful authority provided Article III of the U.S. Constitution created the Supreme Court and “authorized Congress to pass laws establishing a system of lower courts. In the federal court system’s present form, 94 district level trial courts and 13 courts of appeals sit below the Supreme Court.” This means that regardless of status of status, the Supreme Court has the final decision. The Plethora of Court…

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There exist differences between a majority opinion, a concurring opinion, and a dissenting opinion. Majority opinions are issued when the majority of Supreme Court justices, agree with one another on the conclusion and reason that led them to that conclusion. Concurring opinions are filed by members of the majority who believe something was not mentioned in opinion and must express such thoughts. Dissenting interpretations are commonly transcribed by any one of the justices that disagrees with the conclusion reached by the majority explain the majority were wrong to come up with that conclusion. Both opinions have a differing effect on the state of the law in America.…

    • 158 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Nicolas Winters Group #5 Paper 2 What powers do the Constitution give the Judicial Branch? A world without the Judicial Branch of government is a world without set rules. In 1787, the Constitution had created the Judicial Branch, under Article 2 Section 2, to deal with all of the new laws that could be set in place. The Judicial Branch also leads the Supreme Court, the highest court of law in the United States. The Judicial Branch of government receives powers backed up by the U.S. Constitution, has a very strict and complex system to become a supreme court judge, and the U.S. Supreme Court Justices should interpret the Constitution by how it was originally wrote.…

    • 1313 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout the United States government 's history, one thing remains the same, the three branches of government are as important as each other in keeping the nation thriving. Each with their unique set of strengths and weaknesses, the Judicial Branch is one that comes to mind when thinking of having the most powerful strength, proving a system of checks and balances to the other government branches. The Judicial Branch is responsible for reviewing the constitutionality of the actions of the government, according to Fine & Levin-Waldman (2016). What this means is, when something is signed into law or actions are taken, the Supreme Court of the United States decides if it follows the rights and laws outlined in the US Constitution. According to…

    • 834 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If you go out and about within our country and you ask people if they knew very much about the United States court system, they will most likely tell you that they do not know very much about the court system unless they have been involved with the court system whether it be federal or state level. Most people do not realize that the court systems have three levels within them or that there is certain situation that will allow you to get to one level or the other. There is a whole lot of information that some people may not know. They may not know about judicial review and how it came about. Some people may not even know how justices decide the ruling of their cases.…

    • 1620 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays