Pros And Cons Of Drone Strikes

Improved Essays
Wiesner 1
Judah Wiesner
Joan Fisher
English 101
March 7, 2017
Above the law: Murder without consequence
As stated in the 10 commandments, “Thou shalt not kill.” A clear statement, yet if necessary we kill without thought, but mostly for self-defense; but if, for example, you killed an innocent civilian, you would spend 15 years to life in prison. If thousands of people are getting locked up every day for murder, why shouldn’t the government? The United States of America should stop drone strikes abroad because it kills large numbers of civilians and traumatizes local populations, it is secretive, lacks sufficient legal oversight, and it targets individuals who may not even be terrorists or enemy combatants. Unmanned aerial vehicles, otherwise
…show more content…
The fact that the government is getting away with these irresponsible and reckless actions every year is astonishing. But casualties aren’t the only thing keeping these bombings from being successful. Another large problem is that these strikes are secretive and lack legal oversight, which leads to us not being able to hold our leaders accountable. Drones are used in conflicts where war is not openly declared and authorized by Congress, allowing the executive branch to have virtually unlimited power over secret wars across the world. The CIA has yet to officially acknowledge its drone programs anywhere in the world, let alone describe the rules and procedures for compliance with US and international law (Amnesty …show more content…
Drone strikes help to create a much safer experience for our soldiers by taking them from the battlefield; Instead of “boots on the ground” combat, we can keep certain soldiers on U.S. soil, piloting drones out of allied territory. The Taliban, Al-Qaeda, and their affiliates often operate in environmentally distant and unforgiving locations where it would be exceptionally dangerous for the U.S. to deploy teams of special forces to track and capture terrorists, and drones keep us from doing so. Although this operation is a life saver, it is also a life

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Drone Strikes

    • 916 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Under international humanitarian law, the targeted persons must be directly playing a part in hostilities with the United States. Furthermore, the targeted persons must also pose an imminent threat that only lethal force can prevent (“Living Under Drones”). Simply being assumed to have a connection with a "militant" organization or under the United States policy of "signature" drone strikes is not legally appropriate to make someone a acceptable target for killing. Moreover, the United Nations ' Special Rapporteur on counter-terrorism, Human Rights Chief, and Special Rapporteur on summary, arbitrary, or extrajudicial executions have all labeled US drone strikes as a violation of sovereignty, and have pressed for investigations into the legality of the…

    • 916 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Drone warfare, enacted by George Bush and expanded on by President Obama to provide safety for Americans against al-Qaeda. Rather than retrieving intelligence from sources within the country, the use of weaponized unmanned surveillance drones allowed for far better independent targeting decisions. These strategic implications created a question among Americans, is the use of drones to target individuals ethical? This question has arisen due to a high number of civilian casualties, making it seem unmoral. Kenneth Anderson, however, provides readers a strong argument as to why drone warfare is strategically effective with his tone, organization, use of quotes, and appeal to logic in his article, “The Case for Drones.”…

    • 959 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Drone strikes are cheaper than engaging in ground or manned aerial combat. Drone strikes are legal under international law. Drone strikes are legal under US law. Drones limit the scope and scale of military action. Drone strikes are subject to a strict review process and congressional oversight.…

    • 430 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Ethics surrounding drone warfare has been a controversial debate that has not yet captured the full attention of the public in the west. The main arguments for using drone warfare has been about saving lives and cost, but such argument pales in comparison to the arguments against it. To examine the counter arguments of why drone warfare is ethically wrong, we must look at the political stance of the governments using drone warfare, the society’s responsibility, the ethics of the way that the drone strikes are conducted, the effectiveness of drone warfare and the international irresponsibility and unethical nature of drone strikes. Drone warfare saves the lives of soldiers by placing them out of harms way; this is one of the arguments for…

    • 1913 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    “Drones do not capture hard drives, organizational charts, strategic plans, or secret correspondence, and their tactical effectiveness is entirely dependent on the caliber of human intelligence on the ground.” “The drone campaign presents a fundamental challenge to U.S. national security law, as evidenced by the controversial killing of four American citizens in attacks in Yemen and Pakistan.” The use of drone strikes has allowed the president to be personally, “involved in putting together kill lists that can include…

    • 803 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Joint Committee on Human Rights published a report on drone strikes discussing the legal justification used to defend the use of drone strikes. This report is clear…

    • 658 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Drones strikes and drones don’t help people feel any safer and are the true terrorist against civilians. How the CIA and JSOC use drones aren't a legal way to use the drones and are a violation against Human and political rights. Drones are a violation to International Covenant and Political rights by killing people suspected to be a terrorist. “According to top secret intelligence reports reviewed by…

    • 800 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are a lot of civilian lives lost to these drone strikes. This is including women and children. In the year 2008, there has been 168-204 deaths of children due to target drone strikes. Columbia Law explains some recent events, “In Somalia, on October 4, 2011, al-Shabaab bombed the Transitional Federal Government compound in Mogadishu as revenge for the growing number of drone strikes against its forces, according to one report. The suicide bombing killed over 70 people and injured hundreds more, most of whom were Somali teenagers.108” ( Law 26).…

    • 1739 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Drone Warfare Ethics

    • 880 Words
    • 4 Pages

    There have been many American people questioning the United States Drone Program over the last six years; Is this new type of warfare moral? How many civilian casualties have occurred since the program began at the beginning of Obama’s presidency? How…

    • 880 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The problem with this is that this idea died out around George W. Bush's first term as president, but we have been fed the same thing and everyone knows why we are there. Supporters of drone warfare are humbled by the fact that a terrorist target has been taken out with no American casualties besides maybe a piece of equipment. When critics see the same thing happen, they begin to question where to draw the line. The issue is that the line has been drawn already, but organizations such as the C.I.A. Are willing and are able to cross that line and getting away with it because they are able to justify sending a hellfire missile into Middle Eastern territory. When agent orange was introduced into Vietnam, military personal were delivering massive amounts of it upon the native jungle regions of Vietnam, Eastern Laos, and parts of Cambodia.…

    • 780 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Aggressive Drone Warfare

    • 1948 Words
    • 8 Pages

    As of April 7, 2016 there were several drone strikes in Khost, Afghanistan that killed 17 civilians when people tried to get the bodies from the first strike, another missile was fired killing more civilians, and after that more civilians were killed by a third and final strike (Mangal and Mashal 2016). This is a perfect example how the use of drone warfare is too aggressive in Afghanistan. The first missile never struck the appropriate target and yet more missiles were fired without any confirmation on if the appropriate target had been struck or not (Mangal and Mashal 2016). The United States cannot continue to fire missiles from drones carelessly without absolute confirmation of who they are firing on. If this aggressive drone policy continues in…

    • 1948 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Controversy Over Drones

    • 639 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Drones have saved many american lives in the fact that no one needs to drive them so this will not risk as many lives. If one country fell behind in the production on drones this would risk their nation because they would not have anything to protect their country by surveillance. Drones could also be used to protect a nation by bombing another country if they were threatening them, so if one country fell behind in drone…

    • 639 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    People may not realize that it also expands the size of the targeting list, so we are not just targeting people with guns or any other dangerous weapons we are targeting preachers, children, mothers, and the list goes on. There is talk of also using drone warfare against Columbian drug lords, and Mexican drug lords that's right behind our back yard worrying about it now would be much better than worrying about it later. Recognizing this new type of warfare as lawful would not only be shared by our side, but how useful would our enemies see this technology if they were ever to get there hands on…

    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Just And Unjust Analysis

    • 1444 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Advancements in aerial remotely piloted vehicles and satellite communications technology has allowed the integration of U.S. intelligence and U.S. Air Force operations to target and eliminate enemies on the ground without risk to flight crews. Deadly lethal and operated by U.S. Air Force personnel in the United States, targeted killings by predator drone strikes have become the weapon of choice while the legality of targeted killings is subject to much debate. Like judicial precedence, it has become accepted practice and part of normal warfare because of its repeated and accepted occurrence. However, as of 2016, no law for the drone campaign had been enacted by Congress or published in the US Code.…

    • 1444 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Just cause is the principle that a state should only approve war in the act of self-defense against the aggressor who is always at fault (Orend 17). Drone strikes in Yemen violate this principle because just cause condemns preemptive strikes. Furthermore, an act of self-defense only qualifies when the self-defense is in response to a current attack, not a suspected attack in the future (Orend 17). Because drone strikes are used to prevent Al Qaeda’s potential, future attacks on the United States, they may seem perfectly justified; however, considering that the United States has not suffered a domestic attack on the scale of the September 11 attacks since 2001, drone strikes violate this central rule of Just War…

    • 1540 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays

Related Topics