Along with becoming more integral to establishing guilt, in the past decades, many cases have been reopened due to DNA tests presenting case alternating evidence, which has saved innocent people from wrongful convictions as well as prevented wrongful convictions. Nevertheless, DNA testing has also a history of being inconsistent and inaccurate, even potentially misleading and although these occurrences are limited, it is enough for some people to believe that DNA should not routinely be incorporated in criminals’ trials. DNA testing also has been argued to be unjustifiable due to its incriminating effect. Despite these crafted arguments, DNA has unquestionably alternated criminal justice due to its benefits of revealing imperative evidence,
