Pros And Cons Of College Athletes Get Paid

My topic about my argumentive essay is should college athletes get paid? The future is now and I think every college athlete on a division 1-3 should be paid. The athletes who come out of high school have a lot of fan base behind their name and a lot should come with it. However athletes have help build the empire of the NCAA and get no credit on the accomplishments. Over the past times a lot of schools around the nation have paid athletes under the table. Over the past time both basketball and football have had a lot of mistakes with past money problems. Trophies, medals, and other rewards have been striped due to administration paying division’s 1-3 athletes under the table. I think that if college athletes work that hard to get where they …show more content…
The incident was exposed on the NFL draft night which brought Laremy down a couple spots in the draft. These incidents happy very often with division one athletes. Times get very hard and college athletes need the money. Money problems is not the only thing that the NCAA have flagged. ACT scores have been a big problem also, ex high school players like Derrick Rose have been accused of cheating on the ACT. In the 2013 NCAA competition Louisville player Kevin Ware endured a horrendous harm to his lower right leg while endeavoring to obstruct a restricting player's shot. After six months, Ware was recuperated and back to rehearsing. He was fortunate. There have been occasions of players getting to be distinctly incapacitated by hits or handles on football fields or different wounds that have finished player's professions before they even begin. These competitors are relinquishing their bodies and physical wellbeing at an opportunity to play an amusement they adore, and potentially make it to the expert level. I think players sacrifice a lot to come play every other night on TV for the