Pros And Cons Of Atomic Weapons

Improved Essays
Atomic Weapons
I am against Atomic weapons build up that is happening around the world. The weapons should not be used when countries are at war. They cause too much death and destruction of not only people but also animals and plants. They can damage the environment that lasts for years. Atomic weapons are also used as a scare tactic by other countries against their enemies such as the U.S. and Russia. We really need to think before we allow more atomic weapons to be built up around the world.
The main reason I am against the buildup of atomic weapons is that they can cause such horror when they are used. We saw this after the United States used them against Japan in World War II. “Nuclear weapons are unique in their destructive power, in the unspeakable human suffering they cause, in the impossibility of
…show more content…
Just because you can create and build the weapons, perhaps you shouldn´t. If one country has them and they have an enemy next door, there is the chance that one or other will get angry and use them. That is not something that should happen but could happen if there is not a decrease or elimination of all atomic weapons. Around the world, there are approximately over 30,000 atomic weapons in the hands of different countries. (Greenpeace) Unless we get rid of the weapons, there is always a chance that they will be used.
Furthermore, the use of nuclear weapons can and will harm the environment. Atomic weapons are the one creation that can destroy life on Earth. According to the International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons (ICAN) website ¨It would take less than 0.1% of the explosive yield of the current global nuclear arsenal to bring about devastating agricultural collapse and widespread famine.¨ That is one scary scenario that could happen. So everyone needs to think twice before they actually use atomic weapons. There is no coming back once they are

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    J. Robert Oppenheimer, the scientific leader of the Manhattan Project, has been famously quoted upon witnessing the first test of an atomic bomb, "I am become Death, the destroyer of worlds. " The world may never face another scientific and ethical dilemma like nuclear weapons. Technology is constantly changing and there are a number of developments that will cause moral debate. Most scientific discoveries can be utilized for multiple purposes. Just because there is a potentially harmful application does not mean the concepts, techniques or even technologies should not be pursued…

    • 320 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Nuclear weapons should be reduced because the threat of nuclear winter and even worse risks are too extreme. One of the scariest effects of nuclear weapons is nuclear winter. Nuclear winter is when smoke from nuclear explosions gets so dense that it blocks out the sun. This would block out all of the sunlight causing the earth to turn cold, gray, and dry causing plants and…

    • 296 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It was not made for dangerous weapons and killing, though some chemicals used in the process are dangerous, they were suppose to be used for other purposes and not for a path that has destruction in its way. Initially, there have been many threats with nuclear weapons and it makes people fear it and it harms many. Some nuclear power plant accidents can be really dangerous and can radiate a large area with toxic chemicals. The only way to prevent this would be to buy new reactors which will cost a range between…

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The use of nuclear energy should be a problem of national policy instead of military expediency, moreover, international control is the only effective approach towards the protection of our nation and foreign policy. Facts: If a race for nuclear armaments occurred,…

    • 1443 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Another way of thinking is that every deadly product of technology has been utilized for destruction from machine guns to airplanes. In an article from Stanford University, it says, “History shows folly in hoping that each new amore destructive weapon will not be used. And yet we dare to hope that this time it will be different. We and the Soviets combined own over 50,000 nuclear weapons, equivalent to 6,000 World War II’s, capable of reaching targets in minutes, and able to wipe out every major city in the world” (Stanford University). This article shows how deadly nuclear weapons are, and with the history of deadly weapons, it is inevitable that society is destroyed by…

    • 965 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Atomic Bomb Dbq

    • 1014 Words
    • 5 Pages

    “The Development of atomic power will provide the nations with new means of destruction. The atomic bombs…

    • 1014 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Trident is the UKs nuclear fleet, comprised of four submarines, equipped with ballistic missiles the have a range of 7,500 miles. The current missiles have the equivalent “killing power” of eight Hiroshima’s. The current generation of submarines will need replacing during the 2020s procuring a cost of £23.4bn; this figure will rise to around £100bn by the time decommission occurs forty years later. Do they serve any purpose?…

    • 974 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The consequences of these weapons are bigger than anyone could imagine. Communities ruined, cultures lost, innocent lives taken so fast without even a goodbye. In the story “By the Waters of Babylon”, by Stephen Vincent Benét, it gives a general idea of the risks taken by using nuclear weapons. Humanity can be destroyed and everything left and forgotten all because technology overpowers and the States are not prepared for it. By the way that Benét…

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    That is normal to say:" There isn't anything wrong here for countries to maintain and develop those atomic weapons." However, it's a little bit difficult to accept that atomic bombs still be able to be used in the future like they used to be, but it must be in very very far future because luckily nowadays countries have strong solidarity. Whereas, people all over the world really solicitous about the propect of the world if there appeared any nuclear war again. That is the reason why there are lots of people have voted against keeping atomic bombs in countries. However, it will never be approved: the governments cannot spend massive amount of time and money making modern atomic weapons to destroy all of those things…

    • 752 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Atomic bombs have been a pretty big part of warfare for the last few wars. The first ever atomic bomb was made in July 16, 1945 in New Mexico. Lots of people don’t like bombs because of all of the bad events that can come from it, but it is very necessary for war it has helped the United States to win. Such as the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Atomic bombs might be dangerous by they are a key part of the United States warfare.…

    • 624 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Barash and Webel brought forth and interesting perspective regarding modern issues in comparison to nuclear warfare, stating that recently our society has been so immersed with fear regarding “global warming, economic equality, abuse of human rights, and terrorism” that the thought of nuclear weaponry has completely been overlooked . Given the thesis of this paper, this point is very valuable and eye opening. Most media outlets and news sources only discuss nuclear warfare when it will benefit them (i.e. when a new “World War III” movie is released) only giving a small shock to society’s view of nuclear warfare few times in a year. Barash and Webel also point out that we are all so preoccupied with the millions of other issues present in the world that we ignore the steady rise of this extremely destructive weapon, and the governments that are discussing its use . From a different, yet equally as important perspective arises from an environmental protection advocators standpoint.…

    • 1263 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    This basic concept that the atomic bomb can effectively create its own energy and reactions. These potential fissions are what make the atomic bomb so dangerous in a…

    • 1316 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    World War II was a time of great destruction worldwide. From bombs being dropped, grenades blowing up, and all of the warfare that happened on the ground one can only imagine how bad the destruction was. Toward the end of the war the United States used the atomic bomb to try and get Japan to surrender from the war. The atomic bomb is known as one of the deadliest bombs. Many people believe that it was not right to use to use such a deadly weapon because the war was close to being over.…

    • 896 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although these advancements could be seen quite positively at the time, as the countries were led to believe that they were more powerful with more advanced technology, these changes did not come without any dangers. As the United Nations said in 1984, “It is evident that the designing, testing, manufacture, possession, deployment and use of nuclear weapons are among the greatest threat to life which confronts mankind today.” They also went on to say “The production, testing, possession, deployment and use of nuclear weapons should be prohibited and recognized as crimes against humanity.” The development and testing of nuclear weaponry led to radiation being released into the atmosphere, which in the long term would result in some form of ozone…

    • 1279 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    “You and The Atomic Bomb” They say, I say George Orwell, an English novelist and essayist, wrote “You and The Atomic Bomb” on October 19, 1945. Roughly about 2 months before this essay, bombs were dropped over Hiroshima not only letting the world know who has power and who doesn’t, but also leading individuals to be oppressed. With the discovery of the atomic bomb, and the difficulty and cost of developing it, the world will simply continue on a path of destruction and will eventually separate into dominating powers. It has been common to dismiss the danger of weapons, especially if it doesn’t directly affect you. The American society doesn’t take into consideration the danger of developing new weapons because, as they say, it is not them who fear it, it is them who use it as a threat.…

    • 1220 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays