Pros And Cons Of Assault Weapons

Improved Essays
Weapons of destruction

On December 14, 2012 a school shooting happened in Sandy Hook Elementary School. The shooter killed many people and he killed himself. His weapon of choice was a semi automatic or commonly known as a assault weapon. The murder wasn’t stopped,but actions similar to his can be stopped in the future. If assault weapons were banned crime would be down. The loss of would be minimized. Assault weapons should be banned due to their destructive nature and history.

Assault weapons are far more dangerous than other guns. They shoot nearly a thousand bullets in a few seconds. This makes them more deadly than several handguns or other firearms that are not automatic. In addition, assault weapons have features that make killing
…show more content…
This is because these weapons can be easily acquired. Certain gun stores sell these weapons for money to almost anyone. Any criminal can go out and buy one. Many mass shooters have used assault weapons (“Assault Weapons”). The American people are supplying mass shooters. This also makes criminals more likely to do crimes. The guns make shooters feel somewhat invincible, because the guns are faster and more destructive. Some say because of this “the military-style semiautomatic assault weapon, has become the weapon of choice for grievance killers” (Alters). Citizens shouldn’t let murders be more willing to kill. These guns should be banned because they can be bought …show more content…
The Second Amendment in the Constitution says that all have the right to bear arms. The constitution can always be changed, so the second amendment can be changed. In addition, back then death from guns wasn’t the majorities of death tolls. “ The Second Amendment doesn't guarantee the right to kill numerous people in a few seconds” (Gerdes). The amendment wasn’t being made while assault weapons came. The weapons were too advanced from guns in the constitution age.Besides there is no reason to own these guns. Supporters say these guns are “military by nature and had no legitimate sporting purposes” (“ Assault weapons). Assault weapons are weapons of combat not guns for hunting or self defense. Both purposes would be a overkill. Assault weapons don’t have a good reason not be banned, just reasons to be

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The Second Amendment- The second amendment has been at times the cornerstone of political controversies or arguments throughout the decades due to what many would construe as an open ended interpretation by the founding fathers on the right of an American to own a firearm. The first and in many cases major line of ‘defense’ (no pun intended) for gun advocates, stating the original ideology of the founding fathers and those who founded this nation was a nation based on the freedom to bear arms for ones self interests. The amendment states “A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed” , and many feel as though the key words are ‘shall not be…

    • 507 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Violent Crime Control and Enforcement Act of 1994 made a 10 year federal ban on the distribution of new semi-automatic assault weapons. Many of these weapons were used by violent drugs gangs. That Act also limits the number of magazines a person can buy at one time to 10 rounds.…

    • 975 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Second Amendment of the Bill of Rights states clearly that the people’s right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed on. This has led to one of the most complicated and volatile issues in America today. People on both sides of this issue have strong beliefs. Some argue that when our founding fathers wrote the bill of rights, the guns were not as deadly as the ones available today. Supporters of the Second Amendment today argue that people’s right should not be infringed on no matter what.…

    • 1041 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The sublimation of the assault weapons that were given out could cause both crime and tax would increase and new laws will be enforced. Noticing that assault rifles are not even required to use while hunting, the government already gives out shotguns and pistols. It’s not the gun, but the person who pulls the trigger, but some people want to give that irresponsible individual a weapon of mass destruction. The creation of an assault rifle caused the flow of war to change, think of what it could cause the U.S to turn into.…

    • 537 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Second Amendment was adopted into the Bill of Rights to ensure the people’s ability to establish a militia and secure their rights to possess weapons such as guns for this reason. Historically, the belief that the government should not be allowed to infringe on citizens’ rights to guns was common in early America because of Great Britain’s tyranny. Americans feared having their rights to weapons being taken away because it would prevent them from not only hunting or defending their families, but also because they would not be able to fight back again if another controlling government formed. In modern times, the Second Amendment is interpreted much differently and the reasoning people support or oppose it has changed.…

    • 535 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Assault weapons ban would not decrease crime it would only increase it. Assault weapons being banned would increase crime because of the amount of people getting mad about it they would buy them illegally and they would use other weapons to kill so it would not make a difference in any way. Assault weapons dont increase crime its the people holding them, if an assault weapons is going to be sold people need to get a fingerprint done and need to have a background check with many other things to verify that gun should be theirs along with the information that it is theirs if anything would happen with it. All types of guns are used for crimes, people could use shotguns, rifles, or handguns. So why the government chooses to ban assault weapons…

    • 1222 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Most people want to ban guns because they think the weapons are killing the people. The realization is that the people are killing the people over small things. An assault weapon ban would not reduce gun violence in America because the criminals will get the weapons and use them in the wrong way. If the second amendment is changed, people will not have the right to bear arms and protect themselves from criminals and will not be able to do what they enjoy.…

    • 1266 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Protecting the right to keep and bear arms is not the same as forbidding all regulations on that right.” (Gun Control Reform: Should the United..) The Second Amendment allows for each person to defend themselves against anyone wishing to harm them. If America were to forbid the carrying of concealed weapons or the availability of a gun to people, it would be unconstitutional.…

    • 1120 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Mass Shootings In America

    • 142 Words
    • 1 Pages

    The ban on assault rifles is currently a hot topic becuase they are the main weapon of choice when there are mass shootings. ”Assault weapons with large-capacity magazines can fire more shots, faster, and thus can be more dangerous in aggregate,” Judge Frank Easterbrook said in a trial. A ban on assault weapons and large-capacity magazines might not prevent shootings,but it may reduce the amount of carnage in mass shootings. Assault…

    • 142 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Defending Banning of Assault Weapons Gun rights and gun control activism have been dominating the United States politics for centuries. One of the main areas of the activism lies on whether to ban the use of assault weapons. Gun control activists have been lobbying policy makers to formulate policies aimed at preventing the use of assault weapons. Assault weapons should be banned in the United States due to the negative impacts that emanate from their use.…

    • 1103 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The right to own and carry a firearm is the right of every American citizen, and should not be taken away. Americans have the choice to defend themselves and their homes. People fought and died for this right to bear arms, and saying that this amendment or even the Constitution is outdated is disrespecting those that fought not just for this right but all of our rights as Americans. The second amendment states that the right of people to keep their arms should not be infringed by any means.…

    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When people buy guns from the legal vendors, they will be taxed. Eventually, those taxes will help our economy and the numbers of people buying guns are not a small number. In contrast, if assault weapons are completely banned, the government will make less money, and the gangsters will start selling and buying illegal guns. Consequently, the country’s economy will go down, and the gangsters’ illegal assault weapon business will go up rapidly. Assault weapons should not be ban because it is not an effective policy.…

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gun Control Laws

    • 1010 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Unfortunately, there aren’t enough police officers in the world to stop crime. Also, some officers are also corrupt officials who take part in crimes by working with gangs in their area or just not stopping crime because they are paid to look the other way by criminals. If guns were allowed, an individual would have the satisfaction to not need any help from anybody and be able to help themselves when put in dangerous…

    • 1010 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Why Guns Should Be Banned

    • 1761 Words
    • 8 Pages

    After obtaining guns, children and adults collect them and proceed to improve their accuracy in shooting, but getting rid of them would make the world a dangerous place. Many people who believe that guns are the leading cause of death in the United States, are incorrect. A gun is not a person, it has no feelings nor can it move on its own it cannot be personified nor be blamed for any of the actions. A gun must be wielded by a person and that person is the one responsible for pulling the trigger. If guns were banned and somehow a criminal couldn’t get his hand on one illegally, they can still kill.…

    • 1761 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In recent years, a lot of debate had been going on about the laws pertaining to firearms. Unfortunately, with all of the mass shootings and killings being reported by the media, guns are given a bad reputation. Sadly, many people believe that they should be illegal because they are dangerous and can kill people, but what these people don’t realize is making them illegal will do a lot more harm than good. Guns have created a balance in society and if we were to take them away it could cause a lot of chaos which would result in more crime and more casualties. People deserve the right to bear arms because with proper training one could possibly save his/her life and also protect others.…

    • 918 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays