Pros And Cons Of Assault Weapons

Improved Essays
From A Salt Rifle to an Assault Rifle: Our right as able-bodied citizens to own assault weaponry
William S. Burroughs declared, "After a shooting spree, they always want to take the guns away from the people who didn't do it." The Second amendment protects our right as able-bodied citizens to own all firearms (including assault weaponry), and preserves our natural right to defend ourselves.
When the term “assault weapon” is used in the media no one really knows what it means, as there is no definitive legal definition. Some people say that it means any black rifle with a magazine capacity of thirty or more bullets, others argue that it means a fully automatic military weapon; while some maintain that it means an AR-15 rifle. Even though Merriam-Webster is vague in stating what exact type of gun an assault weapon is, declaring it is “any of various automatic or semiautomatic firearms.” its description is the most correct, as “assault weapon” consists of a vast majority of firearms used for hunting, competing, war, and self-defense. Any ban on “assault weapons” would in essence ban all armaments used to threaten or inflict bodily harm, including knives, bats, spears, and swords, as well as guns.
…show more content…
Nowhere in the Second Amendment does it say ‘the people can only own flintlock rifles or revolvers’; it states “the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed”, or in other words the right to own and carry weapons will not be interfered with, which includes all firearms. Furthermore, the Supreme Court in U.S v. Miller found that the Second Amendment protects any firearm that could be proven to be “any part of the ordinary military equipment or that its use could contribute to the common defense”. That is every firearm past, present, or in the

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The Second Amendment- The second amendment has been at times the cornerstone of political controversies or arguments throughout the decades due to what many would construe as an open ended interpretation by the founding fathers on the right of an American to own a firearm. The first and in many cases major line of ‘defense’ (no pun intended) for gun advocates, stating the original ideology of the founding fathers and those who founded this nation was a nation based on the freedom to bear arms for ones self interests. The amendment states “A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed” , and many feel as though the key words are ‘shall not be…

    • 507 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    I believe that policy 2 that states, Law prohibits rapid fire, fully automatic machine guns, but allows semi-automatic assault rifles is constitional. According to the Second Admendment, a well regulated Militia is the key phrase. I interpet the Second Admendment as a means to regulate the firerate instead of the type of firearm itself. Semi-automatic weapons, specifically the AR-15 is one of the most commonly owned rifles in the United…

    • 71 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The root of the debate is to whether or not the Second Constitutional Amendment is meant to protect an individual’s right to bear arms. The real question is do American citizens have the right to bear arms? If they bear this right then to what extent and what kind should be allowed. With the advancements in weaponry in modern times American citizens should have the right to certain arms for their own protection, but not the right to all weapons available. While the legality of ownership has been upheld this far for citizens in the United States the technology of weaponry has certainly changed.…

    • 2061 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ratified in December 1791, the second amendment provides U.S. citizens the right to bear arms. The second amendment gives every citizen the right to own a gun free of federal regulations, to protect themselves in the face of danger. In the article The Second Amendment & the Right to Bear Arms” by Chad Brooks, James Madison proposed “A well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.” The amendment militia clause was never meant to restrict each citizen’s rights to bear arms. This amendment is based on our god given right, as well as the founders believed that the greatest protection we have to ensure our liberty is an armed citizenry.…

    • 235 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It’s unpredictable of whether the U.S will turn into after the second amendment is extended. But taxes and crime will increase. Kerry a law enforcer spoken to officers and asked what they thought of the idea, quoted from the Kerry and his research, “Most of the law enforcement agencies wanted that assault weapons ban. They don’t want to go into a drug bust and be facing an AK-47.” If the amendment were extended tax would increase as a reply to all the demand of crime to fund research for new weapons that are stronger and faster than the AK-47 and other guns, proven by Valone who quoted that there was no difference between pulling the trigger on a pistol with an assault rifle.…

    • 537 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although there are different views of what the Second Amendment really means, the reality is that in the U.S, citizens are allowed to own firearms. With the seemingly recent surge of public shootings over the past few years in places such as Newtown, Connecticut; and Aurora, Colorado,…

    • 1790 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For instance, the weapon of choice for the weapon for the Newtown Connecticut shooting was an AR-15 Rifle. (Reuters, 2014) There is no civilian purpose for a weapon like that. The second Amendment doesn’t however specify of weapons of that…

    • 572 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Second Amendment

    • 1169 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Second Amendment, the right to bear arms is a controversial topic. Our society seems crazed with the idea of owning semi-automatic AR-15 or military grade M-16s. While anyone who possesses a valid Firearm Owner Identification card also known as Foid, along with a clean and clear criminal record, can own any style of arsenal that they desire in the great state of Illinois. Most people who own firearms, use them to protect theirselves and loved ones as a form of self-defense, hunting or just recreational use. Although not completely effective, it certainly gives people a false sense of security, fighting something with a gun is better than, fighting something with nothing.…

    • 1169 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Assault weapons were made in America for a reason so they should be allowed in America and should be legal. America is full of American citizens who have the right to bear arms and an assault weapon is a part of “arms” due to the fact is has a trigger and it shoots a bullet. It is unconstitutional to ban something that our four-fathers have given us the right to own. The second amendment was made a very long time ago when assault weapons werent made but yet today we still have that right and every gun is a part of the word “arms” including assault weapons. Assault weapons being banned would only increase crime because people would buy them illegally.…

    • 1222 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Second Amendment

    • 1675 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The second amendment of the constitution states, "A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a Free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. " The second amendments mean that: to keep the country free from too much control, the people are allowed to keep and use their firearms. Under any circumstance this right shall not be violated .Since it’s our right why is there so many limitations and restrictions.…

    • 1675 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    If one person does not feel that owning firearms is right for them, they don’t have to buy them, but they should not attempt to tell someone else that because they don’t want a gun, the other person shouldn’t have one either. Most importantly, the second amendment must be preserved. There are those who feel since the wording on the bill of rights says to “form a well-armed militia” and since America has a fine full time fighting force the need for a militia is no longer present, and they would have a pretty good argument. But reflecting back on the George Washington’s letter in the Federalist papers, and the Supreme Court ruling, the right to keep and bear arms is about so much more than being able to stand up an army.…

    • 2181 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Second Amendment Essay

    • 1063 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Second Amendment Gives People the Right to Bear Arms The United States has 270 million guns, the most in the world, consequently, this brings the question of gun control and the Second Amendment. ( Should More Gun Control Be Enacted ). The Second Amendment protects the right to individual gun ownership, banning the ownership of assault weapons would be unconstitutional. Most criminals who obtain guns do so illegally, thus putting a censorship on gun ownership would not prevent them from getting firearms. Gun control does not stop crime, the criminals that commit these crimes have no respect for the law.…

    • 1063 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The second amendment of the Bill of Rights is the “right to bear arms”. This basically means that everyone has the right to own weapons. This includes any reasonable weapon that can be used for an individual’s self-defense, such as a gun. Just like all amendments, to defy someone of the right given in that amendment is unconstitutional. Many people who are for gun control argue that guns are not needed for self defense and are not protected in the second amendment due to it being written, “in a different time”.…

    • 155 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Banning assault weapons implies that criminals would be using illegal means to acquire the same weapons. Security agencies lack the capacity to fully secure the country from illegal firearms. In other words, criminals would still access assault weapons despite banning the same. Possession of assault weapons by criminals in an environment characterized by unarmed civilians put the security of civilians at stake. Citizens are only able to protect themselves when they have access to reliable weapons capable of countering attacks by criminals.…

    • 1103 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Oxford Dictionary defines “arms” as “Defensive and offensive outfit for war” and to “bear arms” is defined as “to serve as a soldier, do military service fight.” Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution confers an individual right to possess a firearm for…

    • 1015 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays