Pros And Cons Of Animal Testing

Improved Essays
Ninety-two percent of experimental drugs that are safe and effective in animals, fail in human clinical trials due to it being harmful or just not working. Animal testing is a strategic practice that cause a prodigious, or a huge, amount of animal deaths. Animals would get injected with medications, which and it can possibly lead to death. Animals are also forced to breed with other animals to create another similar species if an animal goes extinct, and that doesn’t always end up in success. Some examples of animals that are tested on are mice, rats, frogs, and hamsters. Medical animal testing should be banned since it has caused animals to go endangered, animals are killed and held in captivity each year, and now there is updated technology which means there are alternatives to animal testing. …show more content…
Animal testing can constantly test on the same animal that is endangered and make it become extinct. Animal test is not a way to help save animals, it mainly focus on saving humans and animals are just as important as humans are, so it would not be fair if animals million of animals are dying each year to save humans. For instance, the National Institutes of Health which is an institute that studies health “would stop testing on chimpanzees...a couple years later, the captive chimpanzees were designated to be endangered” (Collins). The NIH were going to quit testing on chimpanzees. Even though they made the testing group smaller, it still made the animal go endangered. Now, scientists and researchers have to have a permit, to give permission to test on that specific endangered animal. The harmful chemicals that are going into animals are causing animals like chimpanzees, to go

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Animals are abused and injured just so humans can more easily find products that they can use. This should not be allowed. Animal testing is widespread and harms millions of animals all over the world. Many are tortured or…

    • 805 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Testing on animals is also a lot more expensive and non-practical than alternative methods. (Animals In). “Some people, including some scientists object to the practice strictly on ethical and moral grounds, refuting or rejecting any scientific evidence that animal testing is helpful to humans.” (Judson 12). However, groups opposing the cruel treatment of animals were influential in getting regulations passed to protect welfare of animals.…

    • 959 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Even those animals that manage to survive in the process of testing are going to spend the rest of their lives in captivity. There is no excuse for such a…

    • 464 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    People, especially scientists, are hurting innocent animals that did no harm to anyone. Animal testing shouldn't be allowed to happen because animals are getting hurt, they are not protected, and animals get mistreated. One reason that animal testing shouldn’t be allowed is because animals are getting hurt. For instance, the Draize eye test involves rabbits having their eyelids clipped open for as long as multiple days so that they don’t blink the product being tested away. Popular cosmetic brands like L'oreal, Lancome, Estee Lauder, and S.C. Johnson are used on animals.…

    • 624 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Animal Testing Pro/Con Is animal testing an acceptable alternative to testing on humans? Both sides of this argument are heavily supported by strong opinion. Many people believe that if testing on animals can save human lives than there’s nothing wrong with it. But just like anything else in life there are two sides to this argument. Despite scientists’ attempts at making this something that doesn’t bother people as much, their are still many people out there who are very against it.…

    • 810 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    An easy solution to animal testing are the numerous alternatives that are already available: • Organs on a chip: This was created by Harvard’s Wyss Institute. The idea is to contain human cells grown in a high-tech system to imitate the structures and functions of the body systems and organs (“Alternatives to Animal Testing” Cruelty 1). The chips can be used to replace animal testing in areas of disease research and drug testing, it has also been shown to duplicate human anatomy, infections, and drug responses more accurately than animal experiments do (“Alternatives to Animal Testing” Cruelty 1).…

    • 576 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Admittedly, when conducting experiments to test a treatment or to prove something, it usually involves testing on a subject. These subjects are usually animals that were bought by researchers to conduct their experiments. Some of this testing can be done on humans or on animals, but this usually leads to a debate on whether or not ethical to test on animals. This can also referred as an ethical dilemma, which occurs when someone is not able to make a decision due to moral conflicts. Furthermore, individuals question whether it is ever ethical to experiment on animals, the answer is not clear.…

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The phrase ‘out of sight out of mind’ dates back to as early as the 13th century. This general and broad statement can be used in a lighthearted manner to, for example, discuss a mess stuffed into a closet instead of properly cleaned. On the contrary the simple phrase can refer to something grave. Animal testing is not often on the forefront of the average person's mind. No one thinks about the body count of rabbits killed in order to produce that tube of lipstick or the sounds of anguish from primates being tortured in order to further research in medicine.…

    • 1175 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Cons Of Animal Testing

    • 719 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Animal research or animal testing “refers to the use of animals in experiments within academic research or commercial establishments,” (Swami 269). While the topic of animal testing has a tendency to brew several disputes with its controversial properties, it is no doubt an intriguing one. Examining the positives and negatives of animal examination would certainly cause one to question whether or not animal testing should be permitted, and if it reflects practices of animal abuse. Although there are downsides to animal testing, it should be allowed due to the precautions for human safety. Other than human protection, these studies provide job opportunities for further science research.…

    • 719 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Research for the medical field has been an extremely large industry around the world for centuries. This research is used to find cures for diseases and illnesses which is necessary for the human population, but it costs millions if not billions of dollars annually and is a long process that can take up to 10 years to finish one medical trial. All drugs and treatments have to pass a model organism trial before being tested on humans in a clinical trial due to ethics in medicine. Model organisms are usually mammals, reptiles, or amphibians. Due to their many pros as lab animals rats and mice have become very popular in the medical testing industry.…

    • 1467 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The benefits of allowing animals to be used for scientific or commercial testing are easy to elaborate, although not everyone may agree, benefits the human quality of life. The pros and cons outweigh each other in a way, but the benefits are all for the quality of a human. Each fact made by the pro or con standpoint, all had to do with the life of the human. Many think animal testing is inhumane, whereas others think that it is very good for our society. It has benefitted our society very well.…

    • 229 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Scientists test on animals to find cures for different medical issues or making new products ….. Animal testing is very harmful to the animals because when the scientist use the animals they can suffer from being burned, having their spines crushed, being blinded, drowned and much more. The animals that are used in studies can suffer long-term effects such as electrical shock and social isolation (“Animals in Science…”). Most of the animals that are used don’t receive painkillers, so instead they have to suffer until the tests are completed. Many of these…

    • 1331 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Animal testing needs to be stopped because they are mistreated through poisoning, unnecessary crippling, and appeals show that this is bad science and should…

    • 803 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Imagine being separated from your family at birth, thrown into a cage, fed badly, forgotten about, unloved, and tortured through some of the most terrifying and worst pain? This is the daily life of a test animal. It is horrible, torturous, and unfair. Animal testing should be forbidden in every country. It is a completely pointless thing to do, and creates many negative effects on both animals and people.…

    • 1281 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Pros To Animal Testing

    • 1112 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Imagine yourself naked being strapped to a cold hard table with blinding lights piercing through your corneas,being probed and severed open with foreign tools, and being deeply scrutinized by unfamiliar alien creatures whose only intentions are to dissect you until you are nothing. While animal testing may help some patients with cancer and other illnesses, many ads make false claims about the effectiveness of it; ultimately justifying and prolonging the merciless acts upon myriad of innocent animals. Such an ad stood out to me while scrolling on my Pinterest feed. It was published in 2009 by the Animal Research Development Organization. Animal testing may have helped the little boy, Caleb, in the ad with cancer, but tactfully didn’t recognize…

    • 1112 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays