Pros And Cons Of Animal Testing

Improved Essays
Horrors of Animal Testing

100 million animals are killed each year for medical training, biology lessons, experiments and commercial testing. They are usually are mice, rats, frogs, dogs, cats, rabbits, hamsters, guinea pigs, monkeys, fish and birds. But when companies and scientists experiment on them, the tests are sometimes really brutal and inhumane. Animal testing and experimentation has to end.

Animal testing is a big problem, because the animals are sometimes mistreated and subjected to terrible tests. According to Humane Society International, the Draize eye test consists of rabbits being restrained and having their eyes held open while prototype products are dripped into their eyes to test how irritating the products are to the eyes, sometimes for days on end. After the test is performed, the rabbits are killed. Also, according to animalsinscience.org, animals are also subjected to the Lethal Dose 50, or LD50 test. This involves forcing animals, often rats and mice, to be injected with a lethal chemical to see how much of a dose kills 50% of the subjects involved. Furthermore, according to peta.org, laboratories and commercial testers are allowed to burn, shock, poison, isolate, starve, drown or inflict permanent brain damage to lab animals. And the testers are not required to give the animals any kind of anesthesia.
…show more content…
For example, in vitro testing, which involves studying cell cultures in a test tube or a petri dish. The upside to this is that human cells can be used for testing. Microdosing is another option in which is when humans are administered minute amounts of an experimental product and scientists evaluate the impact that it has on the cellular level. These options cost less money in almost every scenario

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Roughly twenty-six million animals are used for different types of testing in the United States every year (Animal Testing - Procon.org). These tests range from developing medical treatments, determining the toxicity of medications, checking the safety of products that will be used by humans, to healthcare and commercial uses (Animal Testing - Procon.org). Proponents to animal research and testing back their views up with the fact that there are laws in place to prevent the mistreatment of animals, such as the Animal Welfare Act (AWA) (Animal Testing - Procon.org). The Animal Welfare Act defines an animal as, “any live or dead dog, cat, monkey, guinea pig, hamster, rabbit, or such other warm blooded animal.” (Animal Testing - Procon.org).…

    • 1720 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The cost of animals testing is also very high compared to other alternatives, which can be thousands of dollars cheaper than animal testing. These include in vitro models and microfluidic chips. The majority of these statements are false, and often have no factual evidence behind them. As mentioned previously, there are laws in place that…

    • 654 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Reprieve Animal Testing

    • 1044 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In Silico models, advanced computer techniques are used to create virtual reconstructions of human molecular structures. (Animal Testing Pros & Cons.) Micro dosing is used in human volunteers and is the administration of small doses too small to create adverse reactions (Animal Testing Pros & Con.) These are just a few popular methods that can replace animal testing. These testing methods can produce more reliable results than animal testing and will someday hopefully replace animal testing for good.…

    • 1044 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One example includes skin allergies on pigs. It can only predict human reactions by 72% , whereas cell-based alternatives predict human reactions 90% of the time(Alternatives to Animal Testing). Another test on pregnant rats allows scientist to detect 60% of the chemicals and drugs that are harmful to the developing baby; the cell based alternative has 100% accuracy. Other alternatives like in vitro testing can produce more relevant results than animal testing because human cells cad. On the flip side, just because a product is safe for animals, does not guarantee it is safe for humans.…

    • 805 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    People, especially scientists, are hurting innocent animals that did no harm to anyone. Animal testing shouldn't be allowed to happen because animals are getting hurt, they are not protected, and animals get mistreated. One reason that animal testing shouldn’t be allowed is because animals are getting hurt. For instance, the Draize eye test involves rabbits having their eyelids clipped open for as long as multiple days so that they don’t blink the product being tested away. Popular cosmetic brands like L'oreal, Lancome, Estee Lauder, and S.C. Johnson are used on animals.…

    • 624 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The third major area of animal testing is the cost of animal testing. It is worth mentioning that animal testing is a very expensive process. When we think of animal testing, one might neglect the fact that in order to use animal for research or education, those animals must be housed, fed, cared, and then treated with experimental substances and drugs. Obviously, providing care costs a significant amount of money.…

    • 464 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Animal testing is cruel and inhumane. These animals are subjected to forced feeding, forced inhalation, food and water deprivation, prolonged periods of physical restraint, infliction of burns and wounds to study the healing process and effects and remedies. Among the cruelest experiments is the Draize eye test which evaluates irritation by shampoos and other products to the eyes. During this experiment rabbits are restrained and their eyelids are held open by clips for multiple days which leads to the death of 50% of rabbits used (Scientific American, "Do Cosmetic Companies Still Test on Live Animals?," scientificamerican.com). We also are very different from animals; having different metabolic, anatomical, and cellular differences.…

    • 636 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Is Animal Testing Worth

    • 633 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Is Animal Testing Worth It? Every year, nearly one hundred million animals --including mice, rats, dogs, monkeys, etc.-- die in many United States laboratories because of cosmetic, medical and biology testing, and experiments that serve no purpose. To understand the true terrors of animal testing, people need to know what animals are going through. Animals in laboratories suffer from day-to-day protocols and laboratory life, many do not even get a chance to experience fresh air or sunshine because they live in cages.…

    • 633 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The website animal-test.procon.org shares how animals are being treated in the Draize Acute Toxicity test. The supposed reason for this experiment is to see if there is irritation caused by shampoos or other cosmetic products. The test involves “…scientists use clips to hold a rabbits’ eyelid open for multiple days, so they cannot blink when products are being tested” (animal-test.procon.org). This barbaric process results in hemorrhaging and blindness. Even more shocking is that if an animal does endure test, they are subject to that treatment again; if they do not recover, then they are killed.…

    • 609 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Animal Testing In The US

    • 1025 Words
    • 5 Pages

    According to the Humane Society, “Animals being used in experiments are subjected to food and water deprivation, long periods of physical movement restraint, and burns along with other wounds to study the healing process” (Costa). These are crucial points to ban animal testing. When you take animals and conduct experiments on them it affects them deeply. “The Draize Eye Test is used by cosmetic companies to study irritation caused by shampoos and other products, involves rabbits being held in stocks with their eyelids held open by clips, sometimes for multiple days, so they cannot blink away the products being tested” (Costa). Everyday millions of animals go through these cruel measures to allegedly ensure safety of products for…

    • 1025 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Cruelty is NOT Beautiful”. The Federal Drug & Food Administration (FDA) does not require testing products on animals before selling them to consumers and yet companies still continue. Cheaper, more humane alternatives are possible for companies to experiment on while testing their products exist. These types of tests include incubated petri dishes using human cells that can produce more possibilities for something going wrong than what testing on animals may not show. However, these brands continue testing lethal chemicals on animals year after year.…

    • 375 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Although animal experimentation has provided many benefits, there are alternatives to test toxic substances that may eliminate the cruel use of animals in research. The United States, along with many other countries, have turned to the use of animals in research labs to test human products for hazardous substances. According to the Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, the United States uses about 12 million animals every year making it the biggest conductor of animal experimentation in the world. Scientists and many companies believe that testing their products on animals save humans from being harmed if the product is toxic. However, no matter what the benefits of animal experimentation are, the tests conducted on the animals are cruel.…

    • 2056 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Animal testing has been a part of our society since the early 1900s. And it appears to me, that not until around 40 years ago or so, people began to realize that testing animals was inhumane on many different levels. But because we are the human beings that we are, we still try to shy away from a lot of the negative consequences of animal testing. It is easier for us to push aside that which is bad and try only to look at the positive aspects. Yet, in my opinion, the cons outweigh the pros.…

    • 1101 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Why Animal Testing Should Be Banned Everyday innocent animals are being forced into labs and tested for human research advancement. Cruelty Free International states how approximately 115 million animals, including rabbits, guinea pigs, hamsters, rats, mice, dogs and monkeys are used in dangerous laboratory experiments every year. In fact, many of the experiments are said to be useless tests, as stated, “The reality is that the majority of animal experiments do not contribute to improving human health, and the value of the role that animal experimentation plays in most medical advances is questionable” (“Animal Testing is Bad Science”). Misconceptions by the media may stretch the idea how animal testing can cure diseases, illnesses etc.. But actually, as emphasized, animal testing is an inefficient way of finding medical advances, making the procedures to be unnecessary and making there be no reason to force animals into labs without a choice, it's blatantly a waste of animals lives.…

    • 982 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Should Animals Be Used for Scientific or Commercial Testing? Introduction: An estimated twenty six million animals are used every year in the United States for scientific and commercial testing. Animals should not be used for scientific or commercial testing because animal testing is cruel and inhumane, animals make poor test subjects, and animals’ rights are violated. I. Animals should be used for scientific or commercial testing.…

    • 621 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays