Pro: Alcoholic Beverage Advertising Should be Restricted Every day journalists investigate the effect of promoting alcoholic beverage advertising on people without restriction. They expose numerous points to convince people and even the government to stop those advertisements for good. One example of these articles has been written by Laurie Leiber who has strong facts and ideas against these ads. Just by reading the article, readers can easily understand the message of this author. However, to always be clear about the point of the articles, it is always important to ask these questions to oneself: what is the purpose of the passage? What is the main significant information? What are the assumption if there are, and why the writer
…show more content…
According to the first sentence of the passage “the research record on alcohol advertising as proof that alcohol promotion has no impact on consumption” can deliver the author’s message clearly and concisely. The is no need to keep promoting ads that do not have a positive effect in the society and the only thing that provoke is to bring problems and to spend more money, which can be used for sick people, etc. Furthermore, the most important information in the passage is when the author tells the audience about a research, which it has led by Joel W. Grube and Lawrence Wallack, who strongly agree to stop those ads and make a difference to change the world. They believe that TV ads can lead children to drink earlier in life or to drink when they become adults, and that will be the implications because children’s future will be compromised. Additionally, another implication of these ads is that if it is not stoppable, then death will increase due to alcohol-related motor-vehicle crashes. Readers can easily see the assumptions underlying author’s writing because even though that Laurie Leiber has no proof that “alcohol advertising would save 2,000 to 3,000 people from death” it is true and it could possibly
According to the first sentence of the passage “the research record on alcohol advertising as proof that alcohol promotion has no impact on consumption” can deliver the author’s message clearly and concisely. The is no need to keep promoting ads that do not have a positive effect in the society and the only thing that provoke is to bring problems and to spend more money, which can be used for sick people, etc. Furthermore, the most important information in the passage is when the author tells the audience about a research, which it has led by Joel W. Grube and Lawrence Wallack, who strongly agree to stop those ads and make a difference to change the world. They believe that TV ads can lead children to drink earlier in life or to drink when they become adults, and that will be the implications because children’s future will be compromised. Additionally, another implication of these ads is that if it is not stoppable, then death will increase due to alcohol-related motor-vehicle crashes. Readers can easily see the assumptions underlying author’s writing because even though that Laurie Leiber has no proof that “alcohol advertising would save 2,000 to 3,000 people from death” it is true and it could possibly