Pros And Cons Of Abolishing Death Penalty

Improved Essays
nobody deserves to die for committing crime by mistake or without conscious, so the main point for human rights examinations must be that the death penalty is disproportionate with fundamental human rights standards."Man must evolve for all human conflict a method which rejects revenge, aggression and retaliation. The foundation of such a method is love."(Martin Luther King). Capital punishment may have impact in expanding violence mentalities in a society which might increase the quantity of crimes rate in countries that practiced it. For example, if a society used to violence, they will feel it is justifiable and appropriate because it was done by the country. Abolishing death penalty can contribute to improve global image for such a powerful

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The death penalty should be legal in the United States because it is morally acceptable, would reduce the country's crime rate, and is constitutional.…

    • 999 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The death penalty has been a solution to crimes constantly. Justice systems around the world have chosen to take the life of a criminal instead of sentencing them to life in prison. Capital punishment should be abolished because the justice system should not have the authority to take a criminal’s life. According to capital punishment laws, it is not justified for a criminal to take a life, but it is acceptable for a member of the justice system to take that criminal’s life. The death penalty costs taxpayers more money than prison holdings, is religiously immoral, is an unscrupulous solution for homicide victims’ families, and puts innocents at risk. The only way to solve this problem, is for the United States of America to abolish…

    • 1834 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Dealing with the loss of a family member or loved one is already one difficult thing. However, it is as if a domino effect is taking place when the “universe” is disrupted by the troubles. From one person to another, how can we deal with the victims’ families when they’re in pain dealing with their loss? For example, taking the case of the parents of the victim, Faith Hathaway, I believe that they are better served by not given the possibility of the death penalty of the murderer. Simply because I find the “death penalty method” inhumane and ridiculous. It is as if you are punishing the murderer by murdering him. It is completely hypocritical when you are trying to “serve justice” by killing someone who killed someone else. “We kill people…

    • 1789 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Abolishing Death Penalty

    • 1141 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Abolishing the Death Penalty has been an enormous argument in our society. The main question that everyone debates about all throughout the world, is whether the penalty should be abolished or not. To me honestly, of course the Death Penalty should be banned from all states. I do not support it by any means, mainly because it goes against my religious beliefs. It’s not only cruel, but it also violates our human rights and is more expensive than people may think. Taxpayers spend so much money on the Death penalty than they realize. Execution is such a degrading and an extremely inhuman way to take someone’s life. Racial and economic status, plays a big role in deciding the inmate sentencing. Furthermore, researcher, Shetty, S. (2014) have conducted…

    • 1141 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this paper I have presented both an argument in favor of the death penalty and against the death penalty. To start with there is a brief history of capital punishment including some important legal cases. Many arguments can be made as to the morality of execution, below I describe the deterrent effects as well as a common view held by Immanuel Kant in support of capital punishment. Both of these views are shared by many people. In opposition to capital punishment I have considered the fundamental view that killing, even a murderer, is wrong and the morality of charging juries with understanding the laws that govern sentencing. All of these points have support and should be considered when deciding where you stand on this issue. Citizens…

    • 1862 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Necessary measures need to be taken. Capital punishment is the execution of an offender sentenced to death after conviction by a court of law of a criminal offense (Hood). Since the beginning of human civilization, punishments have kept control and thus making a stable society. However, capital punishment is the greatest punishment known to man and can only be used in extreme measures regarding an absolute crime such a murder, rape, and in some cultures, breaking sacred laws. With changing times comes changing people and their ways of judgment. Humanity has become less accepting to the punishment, however, over 55% of Americans favor the death penalty. Percentages have dropped by about 23% since 1996; some countries are even abolishing the punishment for good (Lipka). People do not realize they are only hurting the world by allowing more crimes to occur; sometimes using the heart hurts the brain. Incarceration is another way of punishment but it does not show true judgment. Judgment is justice, and even though no man has the divine right to take a person’s life away, those that “Live by the sword, die by the sword” said the God of the world; meaning those that kill, will eventually and shall, be…

    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The first recorded execution was in 1608 (Fridell). This form of punishment has been around for many years and should continue to be used based on its effectiveness. It has its perks and it’s downfalls, but needs to be put in place to keep order in our society. If it wasn’t for the death penalty I believe our most violent individuals would stop at nothing to commit these outrageous crimes. Individuals are afraid of dying, but not everyone is afraid of prison. The usage of the death penalty decreases the crime rate, provides safety to society, and provides closure to the families involved.…

    • 831 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to the National Academy of Sciences (2014), 1 out of every 25 criminals are wrongfully convicted, yet despite this horrific fact, many countries still impose the death penalty on those found guilty of a serious crime, a punishment that is inhumane, horrible, and goes against all human rights. 140 countries have abolished the death penalty because, it does not serve justice, and it only serves as revenge. Amnesty (International. 2016). Unfortunately, many countries have yet to be convinced and continue to use this ultimate retribution. Perhaps understanding just what capital punishment is, how it affects the inmates, why capital punishment should be abolished might lead to a reconsideration of this practice.…

    • 927 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Joe Harris Sullivan, now 30 years old is convicted of sexual assault, burglary and grand theft since the age of thirteen. Not to mention he was tried as an adult and is sentenced to life in prison without parole. Along with two other juveniles, Sullivan broke into an elderly woman's house, stole her things and raped her. In addition, a case known as Roper vs. Simmons case, the U.S. supreme court decided to abolish the death penalty for juveniles. This made Sullivan take action and he appealed, saying that giving a juvenile death penalty is just as equivalent to giving them life without parole. This means that if the Supreme court abolished death penalty for juveniles they should also abolish life in prison without parole. His case kept on…

    • 243 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    Capital Punishment Flaws

    • 1771 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Some states have abolished the use of death penalty, while in some states the death penalty is still in full swing. The death penalty has too many flaws and possibilities for mistake to continue as a form of punishment in the United States. Although to some people it may seem as if justice is being served when a prisoner on death row gets killed, but it is a sorry excuse for a vengeful action. Two wrongs do not make a right. The bottom line is it is more expensive to keep a prisoner on death row, the death penalty is unethical and leads to the death off innocent lives, and it has shown no significant decline in criminal activity. Based on the evidence provided in this paper, the death penalty needs to be abolished once and for all. All of the evidence has proved the point that capital punishment is not beneficial to society in terms of ethics, economics, or…

    • 1771 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The use of the death penalty has been a long discussed debate in the criminal justice system. First going into this discussion one must discuss the definition of the death penalty and its history. The death penalty for crimes has been a tool used throughout history. The first ever recorded execution of a criminal in America occurred in the year 1612 when a Spanish spy was caught. Each colony had its own laws for the states justification of taking a life. Fast forward to the 1930s on the edge of the great depression and resurgence in the publishing works of criminologists who suggested that the death penalty had a key role in society there was a surge in death penalty cases. During this decade there was an average of 167 people put to death…

    • 1156 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    “If the government prohibits these barbaric acts, why do they get away with the death penalty,” (Kronenwetter, 2001)? “Who are they to kill to other men, when they are killing the men, for killing other men,” (Mitchell, 2001)? “Is killing a guilty person any different than killing an innocent person?” “Does the death penalty apply to mentally retarded people,” (Kronenwetter, 2001)? “Is the purpose of the death penalty to remove from society someone who would do more harm?” “Is the purpose to remove someone who is incapable of being rehabilitated?” “Is the purpose to frighten people from committing murder?” “Is the purpose to punish the criminals?” “Is the purpose of the death penalty to take retribution on behalf of the victim,” (Bedau, 1997)? The posed questions lead to the ongoing controversy of the death penalty. The many revisions of the death penalty laws are due to the few people that asked these questions, and supported their moral values in a court house (Kronenwetter,…

    • 1440 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout history, the death penalty has remained a longstanding decision with no likely end in sight. As it stands, capital sentencing is still highly discretionary allowing for the affluence of extra legal factors in determining its imposition. As a capital punishment, the death penalty is only applied in cases that involve murder and some form of aggravating factor that heightens the seriousness of the crime or a crime against the state. In the 1970s, the landmark case of Furman v. Georgia determined that the death penalty was unconstitutional and violated the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments of cruel and unusual punishment (Wolfgang and Riedel, 1973). However, by July of 1976, Gregg v. Georgia reinstated the death penalty as a result of states rewriting their death statutes.…

    • 535 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The horrible conditions and botched executions take the inmate's dignity, almost to the point where they are animals. Each prisoner has only an hour of daylight and the other 23 are spent in a tight cage-like cell that is 60 square feet(“Conditions on Death Row in Texas” 2017). There is one small window at one end and a small food tray slot. Receiving meals through that tiny slot is the only human interaction they get. Moreover, these are practically solitary confinement cells and drive almost all even more insane. The innocent , which are about 10% of the inmates, also have to experience these degrading conditions. This is completely unacceptable no matter which way the country looks at it. Those are years they will never get back. Altogether,…

    • 561 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One of the most debated ethical issues throughout the entire history of man, has been capital punishment (death penalty). Is it necessary, and more importantly, is it moral to put someone to death for a crime which they have committed? This questions has been raised and debated in every country and at every period of time, as far back as known history will allow us to observe. This paper will present and discuss the dilemma of capital punishment on ethical grounds and present arguments both for and against capital punishment. This paper will also look at the history and evolution of capital punishment, as well as attempt to gauge what will become of the practice in the foreseeable future.…

    • 783 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays