Human Trafficking Argumentative Analysis

On the year of 2012 many propositions were proposed, and us as citizens got to choose whether it should, or whether it should not become a law. One proposition that was on the ballot in 2012 was proposition 35- Human Trafficking Penalties Initiative Statute. Human trafficking is well defined as labor trafficking, and sex trafficking where the victim has no say in this, and is exploited. Human Trafficking happens everywhere in the world, and although they are trying to stop Human Trafficking people believe that they should implement stronger rule, and punishments for these people who are doing this horrible thing. Women, and children unfortunately fall into the hands of these people because these people will offer them “good paying jobs” opportunities that well make their life better. When viewing this proposition we will get to see what it is about, identifying the pros, and cons of it, to seeing the polls of how many people were agreeing or disagreeing to these propositions, made us aware of what would happen if they were to be passed. …show more content…
Penalties - California State Government."). This would cause an innocent child to pay for something that he has not done. They also, say that it is unconstitutional. The reason for it to be unconstitutional they say that the large fines, and the sentences for prison are over exceeded ("Proposition 35: Human Trafficking. Penalties - California State Government."). This is according to the as a “cruel and unusual punishment” (Proposition. HUMAN TRAFFICKING. PENALTIES. INITIATIVE STATUTE). Another example why people should say no to Proposition 35 is that it will cost the government more money to workload in prohibition departments, and to train new retrain the police with new