Proletariat Vs Bourgeoisie Research Paper

Improved Essays
With capitalism, the world divided into two main classes: the proletariat and the bourgeoisie. In term of relation of production, this is about the antagonized relationship between wage labor and capitalist. The wage labors are not commodity and have no ownership, so they have no choice but only sell their labor power to bourgeoisie that is commodified to produce surplus and work for wages to survive. Their labor power is to exchange their means of subsistence. In contrast, capitalists are the ruling class that has the private ownership of means of production and earn profit, which is generated by the working labors. “Capital, also, is a social relation of production. It is a bourgeois production relation, a production relation of bourgeois society. ” (206) In term of the forces of production, capitalism motivates the bourgeoisie to purchase expensive machines and use the labor division method in …show more content…
Bourgeoisie is the only class to rule and exploit the proletarians in the capitalist mode of production. Bourgeoisie needs to lower their production cost as low as possible in order to compete among capitalists that causes a decrease of the profit. Most of the bourgeoisie exploit machines instead of working labors to produce products more efficiently. The advanced technology and machines lead to deskilling of wage-labor. Therefore, people in the working class are also in competition in order to get the job that is scarce compared to before with the immature of technology and machinery development. Machines gradually replace the importance of working labor as machines can do the things that labors do, so it lead to over-competition among proletarians. Many of them loss their job and became unemployed. The over- competition causes over-production because people need to produce more and have a higher chance to keep their job. When there comes to mass unemployment, there would be a consequence of economic crises as people hard to maintain their living and stay in

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Richard Robbins in his book “Global Problems and the Culture of Capitalism” describes capitalism and its effects on society. In Chapter two, Robbins theorizes that the “anatomy of the working class” under capitalism can be described by its important characterizations. I will discuss the characterizations: segmentation, discipline, and militant to reveal what they mean for the working class and their significant role in capitalism. To begin, capitalism imposed and reinforced segmentation as a characteristic of the working class.…

    • 775 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the excerpt from Anti-Dühring entitled “Theoretical” by Friedrich Engels, Engels outlines the fundamental contradiction in capitalism and the social and economic conflicts that have occurred in the past and even today due to this contradiction. He uses a historical materialist approach to analyze capitalism and the workings of the capitalist mode of production. It is in using a historical approach that the concept of capitalism becomes complex as well as very contradictory. This paper will introduce the concept of historical materialism and explain what Engels explains is the fundamental contradiction in capitalism and the two contradictions that arise from the fundamental contradiction. Furthermore this paper will provide an explanation…

    • 1201 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Marx argued that the bourgeoisie controlled the means of production, wage labour and amassed majority of the wealth as a result, which equated to the power to dominate and define society. The opposing end, the proletariat, were constantly oppressed and left alienated because they maintained no power or ability to rectify their position within society. In addition, specifically within a capitalistic society, there was no opportunity for a meritocracy; so even if the proletariats were highly skilled, they remained pigeonholed with no chance for social mobility without a direct shift within the economic structure of society. When examining this multifarious relationship, Marx asserted in the Manifesto of the Communist Party, “The modern bourgeoisie society that has sprouted from the ruins of feudal society has not done away with class antagonisms. It has but established new classes, new conditions of oppression, new forms of struggle in place of the old ones” (Marx.)…

    • 1263 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    They work for their own economic interests as they “develop” their markets. As they work to further their wealth accumulation it consequentially “destroys and discards regions, countries, people, cultures and natural environments”. In the middle working class the labor in the production relations create divisions by occupation, also market value and authority creates interests for jobs. Capitalist relations are commodified, capital, technology and labor are seen as objects instead and commodified labor is alienated. The market definition makes labor a cultural object which means products tend to replace human value.…

    • 783 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The difference found between the peasants and the proletariats lies in their status and workplace. The peasants, even with their varying ranks within the peasantry were poor and provided their yield of harvest to the bourgeoise, manually working in villages far from the city. The proletariats however, were not all poor. Many of them weren’t farmers either. They predominantly occupied jobs in factories and mines, working in cities rather than in villages.…

    • 781 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The new dominance of the bourgeoisie created a social class within the bourgeoisie, and thus the proletariat emerged (4-5). These “wage-laborers who, having no means of production of their own, are reduced to selling their labor power in order to live” (1). The creation of the proletariat was a necessary affect to bourgeoisie’s approaches of production- a superiority complex and divide for struggle naturally came about between the owners of the production and the working force (6). The bourgeois industries expanded and increased their own capital, leaving the lower class unable to compete; Now and then the workers are victorious, but only for a time” (6). This dissonance eventually caused corrosion within the structure of the proletariat, and this struggle created the revolutionary element which eventually destroyed the bourgeois oppressors: “What the bourgeoisie, therefore, produces, above all, is its own grave-diggers.…

    • 1536 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1) The relationship between the bourgeoisie and the proletariat has been an ever-changing alliance since the dawn of capitalism. With the new methods of communication erupting over the course of time, the ability to control the masses has become significantly easier. In modern society today, pop culture has figuratively become the main source to how people choose to live their lives. From musicians to socialites and actors, the public turns to the hottest figures in media to understand the latest trends, moral issues and even political standpoints.…

    • 1601 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    This conflict led to support for the institutions which aided in the growth and power of capital gain for the bourgeoisie. The bourgeoisie is the sole proprietors of labor. Because they have the expendable resources (capital) needed to hire workers to produce more goods, they are able to grow as capitalists. This exploitation is where the conflict begins between…

    • 1533 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Exam Short Answer Question # 1 Structural Functionalism is a theory that argues society is a sum of various parts or institutions, which are all unique yet play an important role in maintaining the stability of society. Theorist view each part of society as significant, and that all the parts are interdependent. Furthermore, if there is a disruption in a single institution, the result would cause society to be impacted and thrown off balance.…

    • 946 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Mccarthyism Vs Communism

    • 260 Words
    • 2 Pages

    According to Marx, capitalism is an economic system of production. In this system, the minority group exploit the majority group because they own the means of production. Means of production mean equipment, tools, and things used for making commodity. The minority group is bourgeoise,…

    • 260 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Marx Wage Labour Analysis

    • 1522 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The capitalist who goes on to buy labour power and pays for its value then go on to own that specific labour process. “Wages are the sum of money paid by the capitalist for a particular labour time or for a particular output of labour” (Marx, 1847). Marx portrays a labourer and a capitalist as two completely different people and rightfully so as a labourer is the person that puts in all the hard work and time to manufacture the specific products for the capitalist who is the one that sits back and receives all the money from the products that have been manufactured by his or hers labourers. The capitalist buys their own labour with their money. They then go on to sell their labour.…

    • 1522 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Victor Siu Ms. Taylor English 4U1 16 December 2014 Not too much separation People have always wanted to be part of an “ideal” society. It is however hard to create said ideal society. If an equilibrium between men and women must be achieved all while retaining a clear separation between the proletariat and bourgeoisie classes. A balance between men and women allows for anyone to take on work opportunities. The more successful bourgeoisie classes keep the working class in peak performance.…

    • 980 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Where the wealthiest owners of means of production, or bourgeoisie, are at the top and the poorest physical labourers, or proletariat, at the bottom (Innocente 2015). These two social classes are at constant strife and conflict, as the rich wish to stay in power and the poor wish to gain more power by means of wealth. However, gaining wealth is quite difficult as it is an aspiration of the majority of the current capitalistic society and there is an extreme lack of legitimate opportunities to obtain it. This is due to the conflict between the two classes over wealth to gain power and affluence, dating to the Industrial Revolution.…

    • 1000 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When the products of labor and the act of labor itself no longer belong to the laborer, they belong instead to the capitalist the laborer is working for. The laborer cannot help but feel disconnected from the capitalists who own the laborer’s estranged product and labor, and therefore the laborer no longer views the capitalist as a fellow human being. Rather, the laborer feels antagonistic towards the capitalist. The laborer sees the capitalist and the system the capitalist benefits from as the cause of his…

    • 718 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In the first stage, production grew due to increasing division of labour. However, this was not enough to meet the demands of ever-expanding markets. This resulted in the improvement of technical knowledge and henceforth mechanization became a hallmark of capitalism. Marx believed capitalist society to be divided into 2 main classes- the bourgeois or the capitalist class which owns the means of production, & the proletariat or the working class which sells its labour in the market. The capitalist operates on the profit motive & does not pay workers, drawn from the industrial reserve army, wages equivalent to the value created by them.…

    • 2286 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays