By establishing laws, countries like United Kingdom and New Zealand “ have taken steps to protect great apes from experimentation, but this is the first time that actual rights would be extended to apes”( Yong 2). This insinuates that animal rights is a serious matter that should not be disregarded. In addition, even though it is the “first time”, is it imperative to notice that there was an attempt. This implies that more effort should be invested in order to completely ensure that animals will and always have the rights they deserve. Additionally, an article titled “How to protect ape’s right? Make him a person” discusses about an organization called Association Against Animal Factories(AAAF)(4), which has adhered to similar standards as the Great Ape Project. This organization has been actively fighting and protesting for the protection of animals against the experimentation of unapproved products. Their motivation stems from the belief that animals are capable of suffering. For example, two chimpanzees, Hisal and Riso, were “captured as babies in Sierra Leone in 1982 and smuggled in a crate to Austria for use in pharmaceutical experiments”(8) conveys the notion that the cruelty of animal abuse is still apparent. Overall, people feel passionately about this controversial subject, and that they truly believe animals…
In February of 2002 primatologist Jane Goodall delivered a speech titled “What Separates us From Chimpanzees.” Her purpose is to address the topic as a question, providing specific evidence, and call us to action. Goodall’s primary audience are those who were viewing the TED Talk at the time it occurred. This included people who are both very intelligent in the field of zoology, and those who are naive. Goodall taps the interests of those well educated in a field like hers, but at the same time is able to simplify complex matters so that even children can thoroughly understand her message. Goodall utilizes ethos, pathos, and logos in her discussion to help us better understand our analogy with chimpanzees.…
In “Speciesism and the Equality of Animals”, Peter Singer advocates against the use of animals in satisfying the needs of humans, and placing the interests of the humans above those of other species (277). Singer utilizes the term “speciesism” to describe this prejudice, which Singer finds to be no different than racism and sexism, and questions the exploitation of nonhumans by illustrating how one is not entitled to exploit another due to higher intelligence (277). In addition, Singer cites a passage from Jeremy Bentham that alludes to the fact that having the capacity for suffering is a vital characteristic that gives a being the right to be viewed as equal (Bentham qtd. in 278). Hence, Singer notes that capacity for suffering and/or enjoyment,…
It’s not wrong to support factory farming. Therefore, it’s not wrong to torture puppies for gustatory pleasure. The Texan believes that there is no intrinsic difference between farm animals and puppies but argues that it is not morally wrong to support factory farming. According to the Texan, human satisfaction outweighs an animals’ dissatisfaction since humans are more intelligent and more rational than animals. However, Norcross addresses the fact that there are many marginal cases that make this statement controversial. He believes that whatever kind of rationality is chosen, it will either be lacking in some humans or presenting within some non-human animals. This is known as the challenge of marginal cases. For example, a severely disabled human and a very intelligent chimpanzee. If the severely disabled human were treated in a similar fashion as animals it would clearly be morally wrong. The same can pertain to babies. Babies are not rational, so babies are not morally relevant so we can torture them just as we can with the severely disabled person according to the Texan's…
Clydarrious and Lameishea, Madison, and Unknown baby's father, Clyde smoke marijuana in the home. Clyde does exodus pills in the home. It is unknown if the children have access to the drugs. It is unknown if the drugs are being manufactured in the home. Clydarrious is always hungry. Clydarrious stated that: "Lameishea and Madison can get things, but he is not able to get things (unknown)." It is unknown if food is in the home. The home has only one bed. Clydarrious slept on the couch. Lameishea and Madison slept on the floor (pallet). Candice, Clyde, and the unknown baby slept in the bed. Clydarrious and Lameishea missed a couple of days of school. Clydarrious and Lameishea have no clothes over Clyde and Candice's home. Clydarrious and Lameishea…
In Dayton, Tennessee, in 1925, as a substitute teacher, John Scopes illegally taught evolution. The ACLU was against the Butler Act (which most people in Tennessee believed in), that teaching evolution in public schools was wrong. They took a stand and partnered with Clarence Darrow, a famous defense attorney, to defend John Scopes who was convinced to stand. George Rappleyea, the manager of the Cumberland Coal and Iron Company in Dayton, agreed with the ACLU, but also was hoping to boost the economy for Dayton.…
Regarding Bob Stevens’ response to Rifkin’s editorial “A Change of Heart About Animals”, I would like to point out that Stevens’ arguments are quite weak. Most noticeable is Stevens’ overt use of hyperbole, by which he attempts to poke holes in Rifkin’s writing. While Rifkin simply mentions the practice of providing pigs with toys to keep them happy, Steven’s makes the unnecessary claim that providing pigs with toys shows that they matter more than children, and that this will ultimately lead to children having no toys. Not only is this a fallacy (a slippery slope fallacy to be exact), but this is obviously not true. With all of today’s manufacturers and caring parents, it’s highly unlikely that this sort of thing would happen. As well, Stevens’…
In Recitatif, Toni Morrison directly goes into introducing us to a young girl named Twyla who isn’t in the greatest situation but she comes to meet another young girl like herself named Roberta. These two girls are introduced directly but there is also a lot of information about them missing. We come to realize that, that was the exact idea Toni Morrison had in mind and she does a great job at executing this. Morrison jumps right into the short story and provides us with a little background information to help to build an idea of who these young girls are, and along with that we or given the emotion that is attached to their innocent hearts. Can where you come from, and your racial identity truly identify where you will go in your life? That…
In the editorial “A Change of Heart about Animals,” you claim that animals are more like humans than we thought. These claims are supported by first providing credible sources, then offering experiments done, and finally presenting animal behavior observations. It seems that your purpose is to promote animals rights in order to have animals treated more humanely. The article is written in casual tone for the readers of the L.A Times which are: millennials, Hispanics and affluent individuals of the entertainment industry.…
Describing the simplest concepts such as zoo animals, presents a problem for Miss. Sullivan, and she describes her insecurity as she “tried to describe to her the appearance of a camel; but, as we were not allowed to touch the animal, and I feared that she did not get a correct idea of its shape” (272).…
Peter Singer makes a substantial argument regarding animal ethics, and although the term ‘specicism’ has existed for some time, Singer really brings popular attention towards it. In order to make a firm decision on the plausibility of Singer’s argument, I will be looking closely at Shelley Kagan, who criticises Singer’s argument in itself, as well as an earlier writer who discussed animal ethics, namely, Immanuel Kant. By looking at critics of Singer’s ideas, we can then discuss which view is more convincing.…
All of our lives, we place ourselves higher on the food chain than every other animal out there. Humankind as a whole treats nature far worse than it would ever treat another human being – or so we hope. Throughout the two films, Project Nim ¬- directed by James Marsh - and “The Paw Project” – another documentary that was posted by YouTube user “The Bat Vegan” – we are a witness to harmful treatment done by acclaimed scientists. “The Paw Project” touches on the realities of declawing all types of cats while Project Nim takes us on a journey as a group of hippies tried to humanize a chimpanzee in the seventies. Though they address an overall topic, what makes each of them unique in how they present their information, defend their actions, and draw the audience in to believe any of their actions are warranted?…
When was the last time you went to your local Zoo to see an animal in the wild? If you are like most people, it might have been when you were a child in grade school, or with your children or grandchildren in grade school. On the other hand, was it to see a new exhibit with a Lion or Tiger or even the Pandas from China? With the invention of television and social media, are Zoos a necessity? In the essay “Animal and Ethics”, written by Scott D. Wilson, an Associate Professor of Philosophy at Wright State University, discusses the three general categories of animal rights. They are Indirect, Direct but Unequal, and Moral Equality theories. He lightly touches on how animal rights relate to zoos. Furthermore, Alasdair Cochrane, a British political…
The month of March was met with a multitude of reasons for meeting. The first significant reason for meeting was discussion on a school violence incident that took place at Enid High School and Emerson Middle School. On a Thursday night, Enid Police Department was made aware of a social media threat against the school. The threat was reported to be a potential shooting threat against two area schools. As with what is normal with social media, the actual scenario was twisted and falsified. The true incident was two separate localized events from students. Students made offhand comments about hurting other students. One scenario was even a class lead discussion in a class about school…
ruly celestial was Leonardo da Vinci,” said the 16th-century art writer Giorgio Vasari. That verdict has stood for centuries. No one has ever doubted Leonardo’s genius, and in our own time his fame is greater than ever. We should probably therefore have some sympathy for experts so besotted with his name, fame and magic that they foolishly declared an obvious fake to be the real thing.…