Project X is "an astounding movie about adolescence a brutal, unapologetic comedy about the fantasy every high school kid carries around in his head about being popular and cool and beloved". The reviewer George Doel disagrees with multiple aspects of the movie such as the movie being very offensive. I believe George Doel is wrong because the movie is a party and about having fun not caring so nothing should be offensive, its for teens.
Firstly, George Doel speaks about the actors, the way they speak to each other is offensive. For instance, in the movie he says offensive dialogue is spoken by Costa. Costa only cares about himself and he couldn't care less if his friend's house is destroyed. However, I think that it's just the role he plays, …show more content…
For people who are older than us, it wouldn’t be as entertaining or funny. For instance, in the movie they make humorous jokes about overweight, little, and old people, this joke could offend some people and other people may find it funny. Everyone has their opinion to what would be funny. So, the reviewer would be wrong for saying the style of the movie is bad because its not just his opinion, the movie was based for teenagers.
Furthermore, the reviewer has also stated that there is no comedy, which I disagree.What one person think is funny another person may not. There are a few things that certain people would laugh. The movie is funny but just in different aspects of the movie for people.For example, in the movie there is a scene where they put an actual midget in the oven, or mindless swearing for it's own sake. Only some people will find that actually funny. In this case the reviewer didn’t find it funny because he g, just to have a movie of teenage partying going out of control.
Therefore, the reviewer is wrong, one person may have a different opinion to yours. The reviewer that reviewed project X describes the movie as having a bad style, an horrible excuse for comedy and it happens to be offensive. I can tell why the reviewer would have said that, but since it’s a party movie its ok for it to be out of control that’s how the director made the movie for it to be that
Firstly, George Doel speaks about the actors, the way they speak to each other is offensive. For instance, in the movie he says offensive dialogue is spoken by Costa. Costa only cares about himself and he couldn't care less if his friend's house is destroyed. However, I think that it's just the role he plays, …show more content…
For people who are older than us, it wouldn’t be as entertaining or funny. For instance, in the movie they make humorous jokes about overweight, little, and old people, this joke could offend some people and other people may find it funny. Everyone has their opinion to what would be funny. So, the reviewer would be wrong for saying the style of the movie is bad because its not just his opinion, the movie was based for teenagers.
Furthermore, the reviewer has also stated that there is no comedy, which I disagree.What one person think is funny another person may not. There are a few things that certain people would laugh. The movie is funny but just in different aspects of the movie for people.For example, in the movie there is a scene where they put an actual midget in the oven, or mindless swearing for it's own sake. Only some people will find that actually funny. In this case the reviewer didn’t find it funny because he g, just to have a movie of teenage partying going out of control.
Therefore, the reviewer is wrong, one person may have a different opinion to yours. The reviewer that reviewed project X describes the movie as having a bad style, an horrible excuse for comedy and it happens to be offensive. I can tell why the reviewer would have said that, but since it’s a party movie its ok for it to be out of control that’s how the director made the movie for it to be that