Indeed its effectiveness as a method to improve intergroup relations has become the most widely used (Oskamp & Jones, 2000). According to Allport, contact between members of groups leads to a reduction in intergroup bias when four conditions are met (equal group status within the situation; common goals; intergroup cooperation; and the support of authorities, law, or custom). A recent meta-analysis demonstrated that the theory holds up to reduce intergroup conflict various groups and contexts, even when the four originally proposed conditions are not present. (Pettigrew & Tropp, 2006) or when the contact is simply imagined
Together these two theories describe how individuals with uni-professional identities tend to cognitively segregate themselves into like categories creating a potential for inter-group bias and a mitigating strategy that can be used to reduce this inter-group bias. For professional to function in a truly collaborative team it is important to counteract the effects of a uni-professional identity development by devising educational interventions that lead to a dual or interprofessional