“Vaccines save children and their parents time and money.” (Vaccines ProCon.org). The subtitle used in this article makes the reader well aware of the pro that vaccines can save time and money. The authors of the article writes underneath this subtitle, “Vaccines cost less in time and money to obtain than infectious diseases cost in time off of work to care for a sick child, potential long-term disability care, and medical costs.” Parents do not take into consideration the consequences of non-vaccination. Insurance usually covers vaccinations. Parents have to take time off work, or quit their job, which means less income coming in, to take care of the child who has became infected with a deadly disease. Insurance can try to cover the medical costs of hospital stays, but most of the time, parents have to pull money out of pocket. Furthermore, under the same subtitle on Vaccines ProCon.org, they use the static, “A Jan. 2008 outbreak of measles in San Diego, CA resulted in 11 unvaccinated children catching measles and a resulting net public-sector cost of $10,376 per case (or, $123,512 total) due to emergency vaccination and outbreak response.” Parents that did not vaccinate their child in January 2008, most likely have to pay most of that ten thousand out of pocket. To save an unvaccinated child from diseases that could be prevented, it costs way more than to get a child vaccinated. In the U.S Department of Human and Health Services, the same title, “ Immunizations can save your family time and money,” and the same explanation, “Some vaccine-preventable diseases can result in prolonged disabilities and can take a financial toll because of lost time at work, medical bills or long-term disability care,” are used. Both articles explain that parents can save more money and time by getting your child vaccinated. Also, the child receiving
“Vaccines save children and their parents time and money.” (Vaccines ProCon.org). The subtitle used in this article makes the reader well aware of the pro that vaccines can save time and money. The authors of the article writes underneath this subtitle, “Vaccines cost less in time and money to obtain than infectious diseases cost in time off of work to care for a sick child, potential long-term disability care, and medical costs.” Parents do not take into consideration the consequences of non-vaccination. Insurance usually covers vaccinations. Parents have to take time off work, or quit their job, which means less income coming in, to take care of the child who has became infected with a deadly disease. Insurance can try to cover the medical costs of hospital stays, but most of the time, parents have to pull money out of pocket. Furthermore, under the same subtitle on Vaccines ProCon.org, they use the static, “A Jan. 2008 outbreak of measles in San Diego, CA resulted in 11 unvaccinated children catching measles and a resulting net public-sector cost of $10,376 per case (or, $123,512 total) due to emergency vaccination and outbreak response.” Parents that did not vaccinate their child in January 2008, most likely have to pay most of that ten thousand out of pocket. To save an unvaccinated child from diseases that could be prevented, it costs way more than to get a child vaccinated. In the U.S Department of Human and Health Services, the same title, “ Immunizations can save your family time and money,” and the same explanation, “Some vaccine-preventable diseases can result in prolonged disabilities and can take a financial toll because of lost time at work, medical bills or long-term disability care,” are used. Both articles explain that parents can save more money and time by getting your child vaccinated. Also, the child receiving