In the first place, “There is no Adequate Alternative to testing on a living, whole body system. Yes, sure studying cell culture in a petri dish, while sometimes useful, does not provide the opportunity to study interrelated processes occurring in some places like the nervous system and the endocrine system And also the immune system.”
In any case, “it contributed to many life saving cures and treatments”. “Scientist did some experiments in which a dog had its pancreases removed”. ”that led directly to the discovery of insulin, critical to saving the lives of diabetics.”
In Addition, organizations in the united states endorse animal testing.” “Nature” found out that more than 90% of scientist agreed that the use of animal in research is essential. Without animal testing,” we wouldn't have a great deal of medicines that we have in our current society. Some people …show more content…
“Animal testing contributed to many life-saving cures and treatment and there is no adequate alternative to testing on a living whole body system”. Furthermore a great deal of organizations endorse animal testing because it's very essential. Animal testing is important because without animal testing, we wouldn't have a great deal of life saving treatments. Also there really isn't point on testing on a whole body system plus organizations endorse animal testing because it's very essential to us