The Importance Of Privilege Assignment

Improved Essays
Privilege Assignment

Ralph H. Boyce Jr.
JUST 2503 – CANADIAN CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
Gord Sereda, Instructor
Friday, December 1, 2017

Privilege Assignment

Answer One: Solicitor – Client Privilege While a lawyer will always have an ethical duty of confidentiality to their client, and all information (and by extension, physical evidence) provided by their client (The Canadian Bar Association, 2017, (s) 1, para. 2), solicitor – client privilege would not protect the lawyer’s actions with regards to concealing a firearm and a blood-stained shirt, as the act of concealing the items would constitute a communication “made for the purpose of or contribute to the commission of a criminal offence” (Watkins, Anderson, & Rondinelli, 2013, p.
…show more content…
Another reason that informer privilege is so important is that the protection provided encourages others to come forward with information about criminal activity (Public Prosecution Service of Canada Deskbook, 2014, S3.11(2) p. 2 & Watkins, Anderson, & Rondinelli, 2013, p. 68). Informer privilege falls under the category of class privilege, where the relationship between confidential informants and police (and the Crown) is more important to protect than the information provided by the informant. Specifically, the “blanket confidentiality” provided by this level of privilege is what provides the “necessary assurance to the solicitor’s client or the police informant to do the job required by the administration of justice” (R. v. National Post, 2010, para. …show more content…
Known as the “Innocence at Stake” exception, the crown prosecution or a police officer can be compelled to provide the identity of their confidential informant, when that knowledge is deemed necessary to prove the innocence of the accused, or the informant is a material witness to the offence that the accused is charged with. This exception can only take place when the identity or knowledge is deemed crucial, not on the assumption that it might benefit the accused (Watkins, Anderson, & Rondinelli, 2013, p.

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Argument to Check My Privilege by Fortgangs Having Privilege has always been a controversial issue that hasn’t been discussed enough throughout history; Privilege gives advantages or immunity grants to particular people or groups of people. An article published by Tal Fortgangs titled “Check My Privilege: Character as Basis of Privilege” tackles on the subject matter of checking his own privilege in a strong, blinded, single-sided, opinionated style of writing to express his feelings and family struggles to obtain their privilege and what one and their ancestors have to go through to obtain this Privilege we all desire and want. In this article Fortgang beings by talking about “Checking his Privilege,” which rephrases to explore how you…

    • 760 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Privileged Information is an enticing and different book because the reader takes a journey into their first criminal case, at the same time as the main character, Frank Armani. Armani, a lawyer who regularly handled liability work, was burdened with the task of taking on a criminal case. His former client, Robert Garrow was being charged with murder charges and claims of being tied to other rapes and murders also. The book takes us through the capture of Garrow, the pretrial discussions and work, the trial, and the aftermath of the trial. Ultimately, Garrow is found guilty and Armani’s attempts for insanity charges are put to rest, sending Garrow to jail.…

    • 1053 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In 1976, the California Supreme Court ruled in the case of Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California that a patient’s right to confidentiality “ends where the public peril begins.” It was decided that doctor-patient confidentiality could—and should—be broken if the doctor believes a patient will cause serious harm to another person. In his article entitled “A Defense of Unqualified Medical Confidentiality,” Kenneth Kipnis argues that doctor-patient confidentiality should always be kept, contrary to the findings of the Tarasoff case. He presents the fictionalized case of the infected spouse to clarify his argument. In this case, a husband learns from his doctor that he is HIV positive.…

    • 1212 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Argument In the case of Swidler and Berlin v. United States, the government issued a subpoena to obtain the handwritten notes of attorney Hamilton that had been written during a meeting with his client, Vincent Foster. A few days later the client, Foster, committed suicide. The argument of the United States government was that because the client was deceased they could legally obtain the notes disregarding the attorney – client privilege.…

    • 364 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nt1330 Unit 3

    • 781 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Describe the responsibility of the medical office specialist to protect all protected health information (PHI). When it comes to protecting patient information, it’s about getting employees to understand how to best protect it and what to do if there is a data breach. Training is essential and should include not only administrative employees, like medical office specialist, but also doctors, nurses, and other clinicians throughout the organization. All employees with access to patient information need to have the understanding of how to maintain security protocols when it comes to patient care. Many clinicians tend to look at PHI breaches as simply an IT issue.…

    • 781 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the article “What is a ‘System of Privilege”, sociologist and public speaker Allan G. Johnson explains how privilege, specifically white privilege in this case, works as a system. “Privilege does not guarantee good outcomes for the privileged group or bad outcomes for everyone else” according to Johnson, however, it does load the odds one way or the other. Unfortunately, social privilege is often invisible to those who experience them, claims Johnson. Johnson goes on to describe a few examples to validate his claim. For example, in a recent survey a group of volunteers were asked to close their eyes and picture a drug dealer.…

    • 908 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1. Name of the case: Burnett v. National Enquirer • Citation: 144 Cal. App. 3d 99 • Year: 1983 • Court: California court of appeal • Judge: Opinion was by Roth, P. J. with assistance from Gates, J., concurring. As well as separate agreeing and dissenting opinion done by Beach, J. • Page/section of the book: 996 2.…

    • 1246 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Tda 2.11

    • 503 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Although the school and its staff is bound by law to handle information about children in a confidential way and share it only with relevant and responsible people. It is important to reassure children, young people and adults that any information about them is kept confidential and only used where and when necessary and only for the required duration in order to maintain their trust and security. It is their right to privacy to have this information kept confidential and not passed on for others to talk about or gossip. Parents should also be reassured that the school is providing correct care and support for them and their children. When parent consent is taken in advance, they are less likely to feel that their confidentiality is being breached.…

    • 503 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    M1: describe how practitioners should apply values of care in a health and social care service. Introduction Maintaining confidentiality Health and social care setting Confidentiality is keeping a confidence between the client and the practitioner which is an important part of good health care service.…

    • 1935 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Responsible authorities should therefore ensure that their electronic recording systems comply with all the requirements of the…

    • 1080 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For example if a child is having problems at home which is not being communicated to staff then it may affect that child’s behaviour or attitude to school. By being open to all involved, you can prevent this and be immediately aware of any issues and therefore assist that child in coping. If communication is effective parents/carers are more likely to contribute to and offer support to the school. Also Communication is important because it provides you with a link to between people.…

    • 3030 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Confidentiality, Privacy, Privilege, Informed Consent a. Define the terms privacy, privilege, confidentiality, and informed consent. How do they differ from each other? Privacy, confidentiality, informed consent and privilege all differ from each other in some way. Privacy is the condition of being free from unauthorized intrusion, confidentiality is allowing people to know something on a need to know basis.…

    • 1730 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A comparative analysis between Ontario’s Ethical Guidelines for Ontario School Counsellors and the United States Ethical Standards for School Counselors and the need for an Ethical Guideline specific to Northern schools in remote First Nations communities The Ontario School Councilors’ Association (OSCA) and the American School Counselors Association (ASCA) are both professional organizations geared towards supporting teacher-counsellors and students in terms of Guidance and Career Education. Published in 2014 the Ethical Guidelines for Ontario School Counsellors was created in hopes to clarify Ontario school counsellors’ understanding of their position in terms of the profession’s ethical principles and the law. It is in fact stated that…

    • 903 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    First of all, if I disclose our/my confidential informant. Therefore, I can't get more or information from him/her anymore. If the court ordered me to disclose my confidential informant, then I would use the general rule. It makes that I don't have to disclose the identity of my confidential because it will not make others confidential informant felt like they are being betrayed or not being able to trust me or so. Also, it depends though,…

    • 144 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Orange County District Attorney’s office wrongfully abused the role of informants in high profile cases. Informants are typically low profile criminals in prison who can be used to gain information about another prisoners who have not exercised their right to a lawyer. This informant can take the stand and testify in court against these criminals. However, the Orange County District Attorney’s office created the idea of professional informants. They bribed and strategically placed these informants to trick other prisoners to confess to their acts of deviance.…

    • 869 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays