Private Property: An Excerpt From The Communist Manifesto By Karl Marx

Improved Essays
The first source is an excerpt from the Communist Manifesto by Karl Marx, which demonstrates support for the left-wing ideas of collectivism over the elitist system of individualism. Private property is one of the principles of classical and modern liberalism that is present in most democracies around the world; it is the idea of property, both physical and mental, that is owned by the individual only. Although individualism is intended to bring wealth and rewards for those that are hard working and ambitious, it also limits resources to a select few while draining the majority. This is demonstrated in the lines: “private property is already done away for nine-tenths of the population: its existence for the few is solely due to its non-existence …show more content…
In the source, Rousseau uses a “plot of land” as his example of private property and uses this seemingly harmless and simplistic piece of property to argue that it is the source of “crimes, wars, murders...miseries and horrors.” It suggests how the idea of having wealth resulted in individuals desiring to gain wealth and losing their belief in collective values. The ‘horrors’ described by Rousseau are due to the mindlessly selfish and harmful perspectives of individualism which valued and prioritized the wellbeing of the individual over everything else, even if it ended up harming others. Rousseau further demonstrates his support for a collectivist society by reminding his “fellow men” : “You are lost if you forget that the fruits of the earth belong to all and the earth to no one!” The values and principles of collectivism are evident in Rousseau’s perspective which emphasizes equal qualities of living between people and a rejection of the ideas of private property and individualism. The source further demonstrates the view that once one forgets the collective foundation of humanity, it is imminent for humanity to fall to “miseries and

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    If men are equal, as Jean-Jacques Rousseau claims in the preface to his discourse on inequality (40), why do some men live in large lavish houses, while others struggle on the street, unsure of their next meal? The distance between the rich and the poor has been increasing steadily over the last decade, but in reality it has been expanding ever since man separated from Rousseau’s original state of nature. The state of nature is different than that which is natural, and within Rousseau’s state of nature, physical inequality is the only thing separating a man from another. Therefore, disregarding physical inequality, nature for man was equal and the state of nature provided an equal playing ground. As early as the preface, Rousseau realizes that in order for one to understand inequality, one must first attempt to understand man (39).…

    • 1335 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dent, Nicholas. Rousseau. London: Routledge, 2005. This book covers the whole of Rousseau 's ideas. It presents a biography of Rousseau 's life and works, as well as his important ideas and arguments.…

    • 1009 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Karl Marx’s view of private property is significantly differently than what we view as private property today. He believed that private property was ownership of productive property. This is property that is producing a profit for the owner. Marx felt that government should control property and that all should share in the work and reward of the property. Whereas men like John Locke and Thomas Jefferson believed that ownership of property was for important for a good government.…

    • 95 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This publication was more accomplishing than the First Discourse; its content was what made Rousseau fall into the category of an Enlightenment thinker. The start of Rousseau developing his theories of “human social development and moral psychology”(Stanford Encyclopedia) can be seen. Rousseau discusses about two types of inequality: moral and natural (or physical). In the first half of the Discourse of Inequality, “The natural man is well balanced by his two trends, pity (which pushes it to the other) and self-preservation (which isolates). In marital status, laws and virtues play the roles of these two instincts” (Tim).…

    • 387 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Rousseau explains how a reset button is needed for politics at his time because the natural state of man has been compromised by the self-indulgence and dependent nature of politics. After man had strayed from the set of rules laid down by god/nature he was no longer self-sufficient and free but was enslaved by manmade laws that enforced inequality. Rousseau criticizes the idea of property “The first man who, having enclosed a piece of ground, bethought himself of saying 'this is mine ', and found people simple enough to believe him, was the real founder of civil society” (Rousseau). In this statement Rousseau claims that the idea of property is one of the origins of inequality, as man claimed the land as his own and began exploiting nature. Rousseau’s call for a reset button on political ethics is at a disagreement with Machiavelli’s idea, where Machiavelli urges the Prince to recognize and utilize the lapses in human nature.…

    • 1706 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Communism and collectivism are two types of government that dehumanize the human self and bring fear to many people. In a collective state, every person is born into an atmosphere where you are not an individual; you are part of a group. Properties are owned by the community or group and the well-being of the group takes priority over the individual 's well-being. Communism is a political movement which forces individuals to work towards the benefits of the state. The benefits of the group are driven by politics and properties and businesses are owned by the state instead of the individuals.…

    • 1561 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    (Rousseau, Chapter 1). Moreover, Rousseau imagined that humans turned rational and selfish once the vices of civilization and their interactions with…

    • 1051 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In Rousseau’s argument, men cannot be as free as they are in the state of nature in modern society and asserts that that institutions and structures in modern society contradict the freedom and natural goodness of man. Yet, a specific government may be able to provide its members with a certain amount of freedom that somewhat amounts to that present in the state of nature. He writes, in regards to the role of government, “Find a form of association which defends and protects with all common forces the person and goods of each associate, and by means of which each one, while uniting with all, nevertheless obeys only himself and remains as free as before” (Rousseau, 148). The ultimate goal of the government is to ensure the natural freedom of its societal members. The law put forth from the government should be a reflection of the general will of the community.…

    • 1838 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Rousseau believes that a social contract is needed in order to preserve the community as it is becoming hard for everyone to survive on their resources…

    • 2006 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the first sentence of the source it is says, “An economic system based on private property turns citizens against each other…” They are referring to rich people in a Capitalist society, a society were there is no government involvement, free market and private property, are able to acquire a higher standard of living compared to the people that do not have a lot of money. Rich people love a Capitalist society because they have everything they want, it is running perfectly to them. The second sentence in the source states that, “…The interest of those who “have” are in conflict with the interest of those who “have not.” The rich have the ability to get richer as the poor get poorer. The rich can have anything they want, it causes conflict of interest between the two classes.…

    • 1070 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Monique Wilder Professor David Hill SSP 101.7920 July 15, 2015 Midterm 1) Explain the main differences and similarities between the ideas of Hobbes and Locke’s. Similarities include: rights, state of nature, atheism, powers of a sovereign, and the idea that governments are beneficial. John Locke and Thomas Hobbes are two social contract theorist who share similarities in their Social Contract Theories, however they both have differences. The social contract theory is a voluntary agreement among individuals by which organized society is brought into being and invested with the right to secure mutual protection and welfare or to regulate the relations among its members.…

    • 908 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Because it doesn’t matter how much we complain about poor management of the state’ dealings and/or regulations imposed to us. There are no excuses for resisting power because it is the only thing between us and what we most want to avoid, the State of Nature. John Locke had a different approach as to the kind of place the State of Nature is, and consequently his argument concerning the Social Contract and the relationship between men and authority varies. According to Locke, the State of Nature is the natural condition of mankind.…

    • 1284 Words
    • 6 Pages
    • 3 Works Cited
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Rousseau believes that humans are born innocent but are later corrupted by society. “Although, in this state, he deprives himself of some advantages which he got from nature, he gains in return others so great” (Rousseau). Rousseau believes that men are born equal but through the influence of society men “deprives himself of some advantages” that they are born with. Rousseau uses the words such as “advantages” to inform the reader about the features that mankind is born with but society removes it. The tone Rousseau uses is pro mankind but only to an extent.…

    • 1567 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Both Jean-Jacques Rousseau and Karl Marx share the political and economical ideology that private property separates society into classes, and creates oppression. However, the two view property in different regards. Rousseau views property in a more political view, while Marx focuses more on the economic sphere of property and society. This paper will first state Rousseau and his critique of property, inequality, and the emergence of society found in The Discourses. Then, it will contrast the political critique of Rousseau with that of Karl Marx’s economic critique regarding property, and include other critical parts of Marx’s work including the Jewish Question and the Communist Manifesto.…

    • 1114 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Rousseau criticizes the state of nature described by Hobbes; instead of a constant state of fear, Rousseau described it as equality and happiness. Through the passage of time, the state of nature started to disappear as small communities formed, here man started to make comparisons to one another as class divisions developed. For Rousseau private property was a drastic change because communities went away from a simple state to one that consisted of greed and rivalry. Disapproving of Hobbes, who argued that people surrendered rights to an overall “ruler”, Rousseau believed people surrendered their rights to each other, in other words the community. For Rousseau, modern civilization took away the good parts of the early societies and replaced it with a society revolved around the state.…

    • 1070 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays