Private Peaceful Persuasive Letter

Charlie made the incorrect decision when he hid in the bushes while Nostrils was getting beaten up. You should always defend a friend even if it puts your own personal safety at risk. Charlie should have confronted Jimmy Barlow, so to help Nostrils. Helping a friend would increase self-pride. Intervening could help reduce the damage that the victim suffers. For these reasons, I believe that you should always protect a someone, even if it puts you at risk.

Firstly, Charlie ought to have stood up to Jimmy Barlow to help Nostrils, as he was Charlie's only friend. Nostrils was one of the only people his age that wouldn't pity Charlie about his father's death, which resulted in them building a strong fellowship. Nostrils' parents welcomed Charlie with open arms and offered him food showing that they trusted Charlie to protect him, only for Charlie to abandon …show more content…
Through doing something, you could get hurt, however, two people getting slightly hurt is much better than one person getting severely injured or killed. It is wrong to just sit and wait while another person, whether you know them or not, suffers, is just inhumane. If you intervene, you could greatly decrease the injuries suffered by the victim. How could you live with yourself, knowing you prioritise yourself over everyone and anyone else? Doing something for the greater good that would benefit others is better than over worrying about your personal safety.

In conclusion, Charlie settled on the inaccurate choice when he stowed away in the bushes while Nostrils was getting attacked. You need to dependably safeguard a friend, regardless of the possibility that it puts your very own wellbeing in troubles way. Charlie should have defied Barlow to help Nostrils. Helping a friend would build self-pride. Intervening could help lessen the harm the victim would endure. Hence, you should always help a friend even at personal