Privacy In Our Vehicles

Improved Essays
As American citizens, we enjoy safeguards against unreasonable searches and seizures afforded to us by the 4th Amendment. Furthermore, the 4th Amendment grants us a reasonable expectation of privacy within our homes and on our persons. But, you may ask, what about when we are in our vehicles? Do we enjoy that same level of privacy as we do in our homes? According to our textbook no, we don’t. Our vehicles have a lesser expectation of privacy for several reasons, among them are mobility, public view and the government’s regulation of vehicles. Due to the mobility of a vehicle, it is easier to destroy evidence or escape. Additionally, while a vehicle is out on the road the occupants, and to some extent the contents of the vehicle, are in plain view. Does this mean that we can be stopped without cause? If I were a Supreme Court Justice my answer would be, at least …show more content…
The first example is a DUI checkpoint. In Michigan Department of State Police v. Sitz, 496 U.S. 444, the U.S. Supreme Court held that sobriety checkpoints were reasonable and the California Supreme Court established some recommended guidelines for the setting up of DUI checkpoints in Ingersoll v. Palmer, 43 P.2d. 1299 (1987) which included the neutral application of the checkpoint, reasonable location, and advanced public notice, among others. Another example where a vehicle stop without the benefit of reasonable suspicion would be permissible is a checkpoint to obtain information about a recent crime that occurred in the area. The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Illinois v. Lidster 540 U.S. 419 (2004) that the checkpoint was reasonable based on the issue of public safety, provided the stop only minimally interfered with a person’s liberty. This ruling was partially based on the concept that law enforcement is permitted to seek public help in the investigation of a

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Information privacy is the major issue in the current generation. People are more concerned about their convenience along with security. For example if the car breaks downs, one can push a button and the On-star operator will provide help by tracking the location of the car. This situation explains how conveniently one get the service immediately. On the other hand, we are not sure who is tracking our car location and is there any harm caused by that person.…

    • 347 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this instance, it is constitutional for the officer to ask the four men to step out of the car, seize them, and search them. A car is considered public in that it can travel from jurisdiction to jurisdiction and therefore there is…

    • 1098 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mapp V. Ohio Case Study

    • 323 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Mapp v. Ohio (1961) Facts Police officers in Cleveland, Ohio forced their way into Dollree Mapp’s home without a search warrant after being refused admission. The officers believed there was a suspect and equipment from a bombing-case in the home. The officers conducted a thorough search and found literature that could be used against Mapp for a conviction.…

    • 323 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The case of Illinois vs. Wardlow (cited as 528 U.S. 119 (2000) ) opened the question: “May walking away, in order to avoid contact with a police officer, is a suspicious behavior enough to satisfy the constitutional definition of the reasonable suspicion ?” Constitution has provided the following test for reasonable suspicion: The officer must be able to point to specific and articulable facts that, taken together with rational inferences from those facts, provide a particularized and objective basis for suspecting the detainee of criminal activity. (Kanovitz, Constitutional Law,107) . The facts of the case: On September 9, 1995, Officers Nolan and Harvey were working in the special operation area of the Chicago. Been known as a criminal…

    • 400 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In lieu of recent Supreme Court cases, the provisions of the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution have been under recent investigation. For example, in the case of Collins v. Virginia, Motorcyclist Ryan Collins sped by an officer at 140 mph and refused to stop. The officer, however, was able to retrieve photos and a license plate number from the vehicle. After seeing images of the parked bike on Collins’ Facebook page, the officer tracked it to the home of his girlfriend. The officer saw the Suzuki in the driveway under a tarp, walked up, and uncovered it.…

    • 299 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    People V. Ulysis Parriss

    • 1291 Words
    • 6 Pages

    .When it comes to getting arrested the police can do it two ways, they can do it with a warrant or without one. However both must have probable cause. The fourth amendment is what protects us from unreasonable searches and seizures. The two important thing with this amendment is the requirements of probable cause to get a warrant and it how it prohibits unreasonable search and seizures.…

    • 1291 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Since the war on drugs began police use anything they can to stop a vehicle. Traffic stops are motivated by a desire to hunt for drugs, not to enforce traffic laws. (p. 67) Unfortunately only the guilty people of color are heard from, not the innocent people of color. This is because they fear harassment or retaliation.…

    • 732 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Amendment 4,5,6, and 8 protects an accused against abuses by the federal government. Each amendment has a right for a citizen. These amendments give citizens fair treatment. Everybody should have a fair trial. Someone could get punished cruelly and they were not guilty to being with.…

    • 278 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1. After framing the constitution it seems that there was a need to change certain guidelines in constitution, Hence they came up with the term Amendments (changes in documents). in 4th Amendment it talks about the unreasonable/unnecessary searches of someone's possessions or seizures (also arrest) which is against the right to privacy. The scope of seizures/Searched should be limited and only warrant should be issued by law enforcement officer before police taking necessary action. in 1792 US State secretary Sir Jefferson, Thomas declared the amendment adoption.…

    • 829 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Moot Court Case

    • 1647 Words
    • 7 Pages

    DAVID FALLSBAUER’S RIGHTS UNDER THE FOURTH AMENDMENT WERE VIOLATED BY THE POLICE OFFICERS, BECAUSE WHEN FACED WITH AMBIGUITY REGARDING THE A THIRD PARTY’S CONSENT TO SEARCH THEY FAILED TO MAKE A FURTHER INQUIRY. BY DOING SO, THE OFFICERS VIOLATED DAVID’S RIGHT TO PRIVACY. The primary question before this Court is whether police officers must make a further inquiry when faced with an ambiguity regarding a third party’s consent to search. The Federal Circuit Courts of Appeals have taken different views when deciding the actions a police officer must take when faced with an ambiguity pertaining to third party consent. It is crucial to our society that a person’s right to privacy is protected and able to be exercised.…

    • 1647 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Fourth Amendment Do you know you have the right to say NO?. The Fourth Amendment in other words Search and Seizures allows one to say no until proper legal document or warrant is shown to search or seized someone’s home, car, personal item and to protect people rights to privacy from the government intrusions. Meaning the government can’t use police force in which would expose citizens. Also the Fourth Amendment respects people rights and that it should not be violated. The Fourth Amendment created a major impact in today’s society not many citizens; teenager and adult are aware of their Fourth Amendment rights.…

    • 570 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Why Privacy Matter Even If You Have “Nothing to Hide” In the article “Why Privacy Matter Even If You Have ‘Nothing to Hide,”’ Daniel J. Solove, talking about the government governed the information to analyze without the permission. Many people didn’t realize how many problems by let the government take their information to analyze. Solove does a great job to persuade the readers that we deserve more the privacy by using the appeal to authority and anecdote.…

    • 704 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The statement, “The Fourth Amendment protects people, not places,” is one of the most controversial statements in Criminal Procedure. The amendment’s purpose is to secure individuals’ rights to privacy within their houses, papers, and defends them against unreasonable searches and seizures. However, to what extent does the law preserve a person’s privacy? The Law of Search and Seizure and the Search Warrant, give the government strict to stipulations as to how they are able to rightfully obtain information that is presumed to be private. Although Searches, Seizures and Warrants seem to have simple guidelines, they are each intricate categories.…

    • 490 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Why Privacy Matters

    • 1428 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In this essay the author Solove has contends that the issue of privacy influences more than just people concealing an off-base. He clarifies how this argument originates from a lacking meaning of what privacy is and the worth that privacy has. The disciples of the nothing-to-hide argument express that in light of the fact that the information won't be uncovered to the general population, the privacy hobby is negligible, and the security enthusiasm for…

    • 1428 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Advantages of Stop and Frisk Procedures Stop and frisk procedures are used in situations that present a potential threat to the officer or public. It serves as a key component to prohibit a threat from escalating and catching individuals who have, will, or are in the process of committing a crime. According to interviews with the New York Police Department, stop…

    • 1015 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays