Pritchett's Poor Decision Making Case Summary

Decent Essays
Historical findings: On October 29th, during debrief at (2040hrs), all BDOs were advised to be mindful of the operation after completing OLC. BDOs are expected after OLC to take their lunch. In addition, all BDOs were advised after taking their lunch, they are expected back on the checkpoint. As a result of Pritchett taking his lunch at a later time, I felt obligated during debrief to touch base with the team regarding breaks/lunches. This occurrence is the second time during Pritchett’s OLC scheduled day that he has not joined the operation in a timely manner after completing OLC. Therefore, a CORE evaluation needed to be written regarding Pritchett’s poor decision making.

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Case name: Rankin v. McPherson, 483 U.S. 378 (1987) Facts: Ardith McPherson was appointed a deputy in the Constable’s office of Harris County, Texas, on January 12, 1981. Her duties were only clerical. On March 30, 1981, McPherson discussed with her boyfriend, and fellow employee, a report about an attempt to assassinate the President of the United States. She made the remark “If they go for him again, I hope they get him”. Her remark was reported to Constable Rankin, who fired McPherson, even though she told him she did not mean anything by it.…

    • 983 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The beginning When South Carolina seceded from the Union on December 20, 1860, United States Maj. Robert Anderson and his force of 85 soldiers were positioned at Fort Moultrie near the mouth of Charleston Harbor. On December 26, fearing for the safety of his men, Anderson moved his command to Fort Sumter, an imposing fortification in the middle of the harbor. While politicians and military commanders wrote and screamed about the legality and appropriateness of this provocative move, Anderson’s position became perilous. Just after the inauguration of President Abraham Lincoln on March 4, 1861, Anderson reported that he had only a six week supply of food left in the fort and Confederate patience for a foreign force in its territory was wearing…

    • 173 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The case that has been chosen for the final project and this case decision is Bidwell V. McSorely. 194 Va. 135, 72 S.E.2d 245 (1952). This case was decided in the Virginia Supreme Court by the honorable judges Kearney, Whittle, Hudgins, Eggleston, Sprately, Buchanan, and Miller. For a little background on the case it started by the birth mother Viola McSorely, a twenty-nine year old, unmarried, trained nurse gave birth to a baby boy at 8:42 a.m. on August, 29, 1950. She later that evening signed the consent to adoption between seven and eight p.m.…

    • 738 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Crocker v. Pleasant Kalei Webb MTS 120 Mortuary Law Carl Sandburg College The case Crocker v. Pleasant is an example of the negligent to use reasonable means to contact the next of kin of Jay Crocker and therefore violating the Crocker’s right to due process. This paper of awesomeness will discuss the allegations of the Crocker family against a police officer named Pleasant for his failure to use reasonable efforts to notify the next of kin for the recently deceased Jay Crocker. As well as, a possible violation of the Crocker family’s right to due process and some possibility of dealing with mental anguish that they suffered because of the city’s lack of training, discipline, and watching over the conduct of the police officers…

    • 756 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Pender Vs Parker case was first brought to light when there was an opportunity for the Omaha Nation to legally tax the all liquor sales throughout the Omaha Tribal Reservation. In 2006, the Omaha Nation Tribal Council elected to tax and regulate liquor sales on the reservation to help stimulate economic development. The tribe’s liquor regulations require licenses for the businesses that sell alcohol and a 10 percent tax on alcohol purchases. A group of retailers sued in federal court in 2007, arguing they weren’t subject to the tribe’s regulations because the land is not part of the Omaha Reservation in the northeast Nebraska.…

    • 1580 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In additional to conflicting views due to diversity among the North and South, Stephan Douglas’ desire to develop unorganized territory, and disinterest in the controversy of slavery, lead to influential conflicts in the sectional crisis, including the Kansas-Nebraska Act and the Lecompton Constitution. These conflicts, and the additional uprising they caused further divided the country, leading the country towards sectionalism. At the time, senator of Illinois Stephan Douglas worked toward developing westward territories. Through the late 1840s and early 1850s Douglas aspired to develop and build a railroad on the remaining land from the Louisiana purchase (306). Douglas’ lack of investment in the issue of slavery lead to his support of…

    • 1739 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The ruling, which occurred during the Vietnam War, granted the students the right to express their political opinions as long as they did not disrupt the classroom. Their First and Fourteenth Amendment rights could not be restricted based on a “general fear of disruption,” which is what the administration argued. According to Justice Fortas, who wrote the majority opinion, the protest was a “silent, passive expression of opinion.” Though a few hostile comments had been made to the students who were wearing armbands, there had been no threats or acts of violence. Also, there had not been any findings that the armbands would substantially interfere with school operations or more importantly, harm the rights of other students.…

    • 772 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Moore And Rogers Case

    • 1596 Words
    • 7 Pages

    On August 13, 1955 a man named Lamar Smith was shot in the middle of the day by a white man. Dozens of people watched this murderer gun down Smith, however, the killer was never indicted because every witness claimed that they witnessed him murdering Smith. There are tons of cases similar to Smith’s situation, when the murderer gets away because of their skin color. However, throughout the Civil Rights Era African Americans made the greatest sacrifice, protestors nearly risked their lives trying to achieve equal rights. There are even incidences when white protestors are targeted by hate groups like the Ku Klux Klan.…

    • 1596 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dred Scott Ruling In the Supreme Court’s decision on Dred Scott’s many consequences brought tension surrounding the issue of slavery in the United States. “In the case, the Supreme Court rules that Scott was still a slave, and therefore, he had no right to file the suit in the United State court as he was not a citizen and did not have any legal rights” (Horton). This case may have been the one of most controversial in American history due to the fact that it deals with such a disputable topic as slavery. In this paper, I will discuss legal and cultural events from the Dred Scott v. Sandford case that may have flared the start of the Civil War.…

    • 708 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Through the Supreme Court rulings such as in the Dred Scott case, the North and South fought numerous times over slavery. The North feared the many potential consequences of this case. The South was reluctant to give up slavery for various reasons. The Dred Scott v. Sandford case set precedent for other cases with similar conflicts. This case also provided reasons for the Civil War to occur between the North and South.…

    • 2004 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Dred Scott Decision

    • 928 Words
    • 4 Pages

    DRED SCOTT V. SANFORD: THE ROLE OF THE SUPREME COURT IN THE POLITICAL PROCESS Jay Barber 25938654 HIUS-221 November 16, 2017 As seminal decision rendered by the United States Supreme Court, Dred Scott v. Sanford brought the issues of racism and slavery to the forefront of American political culture during the nineteenth century. It has also been considered by legal and political scholars to be a “ghastly error”, the “product of an overly ideological and reactionary judge”, and a cause of the Civil War. Many abolitionists and Northerners declared the Supreme Court’s decision to be illegitimate while others demanded obedience to the Court’s decision and labeled disobedience as rebellion, treason, and unconstitutional.…

    • 928 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Is Young's decision defensible? Why or why not? Young's decision is defensible because the school has to assure that the situation does not create a burden on the school.…

    • 531 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The case of Stephen Dawson raised many ethical issues. According to our course notes ethics is understanding what is right, wrong, good, and bad and also what ways of living are good, bad, right or wrong. The most significant issues in this case are firstly, that the institution for long term care and rehabilitation for physically disabled children placed Stephen in foster care because his condition was just too severe and they decided that somebody else would be more beneficial from their treatment and help. Secondly, Stephen's parents initially gave permission for the doctors to go ahead with the second shunt operation required to save Stephen's life but shortly after changed their minds because they thought it would just be better off for Steven to be allowed to die. Thirdly, The superintendent of family and child services did not agree with the parents decision and fought for custody of Stephen, eventually succeeding and approving…

    • 1484 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1. What were the two main findings in the PARC Case (1971)? The case of Pennsylvania Association for Retarded Children (PARC) v. the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania consists in a sue against a state law which denied access to education to children with disabilities who have not reached the 5 year old mental developmental. The two main findings in this case are the right of students with mental retardation to receive free public education and, as long as possible, include this kind of students in a regular classroom rather than an isolated special class.…

    • 1319 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the case of Willingham, after authorities had concluded that Willingham was likely guilty of murder, Willingham's understandable grief and shock at the scene of the fire is later construed by witnesses as overacting, pretend emotion. It is an example of hindsight bias that when people learn something new, they immediately connect it to other related memory and believe it is predictable. During the process of investigation and prosecution, eyewitnesses in the case of Willingham changed their account once told about forensic evidence suggesting that the fire was not accidental. In Diane Barbee’s initial statement to authorities, she had portrayed Willingham as “hysterical,” and described the front of the house exploding” (Grann). After official…

    • 353 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays