A. In my opinion, this article is impartial, because it is just a report of a crime, and do not have any emotional express. This article is telling about about the truth instead of a story, and it does not mention much about whether someone is right or not. First of all, the main part of the paragraph is the process of solving the Mystery of the Feet. In another word, the main character is not so important in this article. Besides, I did not find any evaluation about anyone in the article, so it is obvious that this article is impartial. On the other side, it is not difficult for us to realize that the propose of the article is not to satirize the police or the society. Actually, the author is just trying to tell us about an
…show more content…
I do not think this article seems biased. After searching more information about the author, Olive Sacks, I learned that the author does not have conflict of interest with the characters in the article. He was just trying to record the beautiful story of Clive Wearing, an eminent English musician that had a retrograde amnesia. First of all, in the article, the author simply want to inform people objectively about events, especially the situation of Mr Wearing, the musician that had amnesia. According to the 4th paragraph, “When he was filmed in 1986 for Jonathan Miller’s extraordinary documentary “Prisoner of Consciousness,” Clive showed a desperate aloneness, fear, and bewilderment. He was acutely, continually, agonizingly conscious that something bizarre, something awful, was the matter.” Obviously, this paragraph shows how Mr Sacks himself viewed the situation of Mr Wearing. Besides, according to the 5th paragraph, “As Deborah wrote:It was as if every waking moment was the first waking moment. Clive was under the constant impression that he had just emerged from unconsciousness because he had no evidence in his own mind of ever being awake before. . . . “I haven’t heard anything, seen anything, touched anything, smelled anything,” he would say. “It’s like being dead.” ” It shows how Deborah, Wearing’s wife views Mr Wearing. Thus, the description of Mr Wearing does not seem
I do not think this article seems biased. After searching more information about the author, Olive Sacks, I learned that the author does not have conflict of interest with the characters in the article. He was just trying to record the beautiful story of Clive Wearing, an eminent English musician that had a retrograde amnesia. First of all, in the article, the author simply want to inform people objectively about events, especially the situation of Mr Wearing, the musician that had amnesia. According to the 4th paragraph, “When he was filmed in 1986 for Jonathan Miller’s extraordinary documentary “Prisoner of Consciousness,” Clive showed a desperate aloneness, fear, and bewilderment. He was acutely, continually, agonizingly conscious that something bizarre, something awful, was the matter.” Obviously, this paragraph shows how Mr Sacks himself viewed the situation of Mr Wearing. Besides, according to the 5th paragraph, “As Deborah wrote:It was as if every waking moment was the first waking moment. Clive was under the constant impression that he had just emerged from unconsciousness because he had no evidence in his own mind of ever being awake before. . . . “I haven’t heard anything, seen anything, touched anything, smelled anything,” he would say. “It’s like being dead.” ” It shows how Deborah, Wearing’s wife views Mr Wearing. Thus, the description of Mr Wearing does not seem