Comparing Rousseau's View On Law And Society

Improved Essays
Law and society, although different, are directly related to each other. Laws are meant to be rules that reflect values of the society, although this is often not the case. Laws are often created and applied in ways that help the majority and marginalized unwanted groups such as the poor and minority groups. While Rousseau views law and society as a tool used to maintain the divide between the wealthy and the poor from the onset of civilization, Barkman sees law and society as a pure idea that has been occasionally misused in American society.
Customs are societal rules that are enforced by informal sanctions. Laws are customs that are passed, implemented, and enforced by the government. Barkman views law and society as intertwined. He believes that the law affects how individuals conduct themselves, and also regulates their everyday interactions with family, business, and property. Barkman states that there are five reasons that people follow laws: fear of punishment, a feeling of democratic obligation, fear of peer pressure or informal sanctions, fear of self harm, and habit. Barkman sees law as a tool that was created in order to maintain society, that has been used in American to marginalize groups.
…show more content…
Rousseau states in his second discourse “The first man who, having enclosed off a piece of land, got the idea of saying ‘This is mine’ and found people simple enough to believe him was the true founder of civil society” (Rousseau, 19). Although this was not a “law” because it was the start of civilization and there was not a sanctioning body, it is similar in the sense that there was a rule for the first time, and likely a consequence of physical harm if it was broken. Without basics such as property rules, it is hard to say if society as we know it would

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Laws promote conformity and strip humans of individuality. Humans are born with emotion and free will. Mankind is supposed to be able to make choices, to use their intuition to solve problems. Laws suppress these characteristics. By telling us what to do and how to act, laws effectively turn people into beings no more autonomous than programmed machines.…

    • 983 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Confucianism Dbq

    • 1017 Words
    • 5 Pages

    According to Document 5, “Should the lord of men discard law and practice selfishness, high and low would have no distinction.” Essentially, without the use of laws, people would act selfish as if they were part of a higher class. The law not only disciplines people, but it also makes then selfless. It is a common denominator within society that unifies differing social…

    • 1017 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Laws and Regulations could be used in the world to be helpful in some aspects of life but can also be used for bad things in other aspects. In the texts 1984, Radioactive, and Space Oddity many things could be learned about how laws and regulations could be used in the world today. In each of these stories, there are different laws and regulations that will control the characters the way that the specific government in the story wants them to be like. In some of these texts, the government wants their people to be free and be able to do anything but in some other governments, the governments want their people to live in one specific way that the government creates for them and it's not necessarily the best way to live.…

    • 506 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    Natural Liberty in Nature Alone Modern idealizations of success and prosperity over one’s lifetime are generally compromised by images of wealth, academic achievement, innovation, and leaving a legacy behind. Although all are perceived to be accomplishments, the state of nature at its core does nothing that requires man to submit himself to these needs. Instead, it is man who has over generations created the present constructs harnessing his passion, demanding his performance, and creating chasms in equality. According to Rousseau, man in the state of nature possesses true freedom unlike the civilized man.…

    • 1739 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Going back centuries, laws and rights judges perpetrator unjustly or correctly. There are law that excuse wrongfully convicted felons and let criminals roam free. Law intertwines with our lives everyday, they are doubted and debated, maybe some…

    • 570 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In Rousseau’s argument, men cannot be as free as they are in the state of nature in modern society and asserts that that institutions and structures in modern society contradict the freedom and natural goodness of man. Yet, a specific government may be able to provide its members with a certain amount of freedom that somewhat amounts to that present in the state of nature. He writes, in regards to the role of government, “Find a form of association which defends and protects with all common forces the person and goods of each associate, and by means of which each one, while uniting with all, nevertheless obeys only himself and remains as free as before” (Rousseau, 148). The ultimate goal of the government is to ensure the natural freedom of its societal members. The law put forth from the government should be a reflection of the general will of the community.…

    • 1838 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    John Locke and Jean-Jacque Rousseau present themselves as very distinct philosophers. They both use similar terms, such as, the State of Nature, but conceptualize them differently. In my paper, I will argue that Locke’s argument on his proposed state of nature and civil society is more realistic in our working society than Rousseau’s theory. At the core of their theories, Locke and Rousseau both agree that we all begin in a State of Nature in that everyone should be “equal one amongst another without subordination or subjection,” in which we are free with no government or laws to guide one’s behavior.…

    • 1297 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “John Locke’s understanding of freedom and equality is the essential basis of any happy and prosperous society”. Jean-Jacques Rousseau, famous philosopher of the 18th century also believed in the philosophy of natural law; although…

    • 1254 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    When examining the question of whether John Rawls would consider Jean-Jacques Rousseau’s ideal society in the Social Contract fair, it is important to not only understand Rousseau’s ideal society more closely, but also understand what Rawls defines as being fair. First, the society that Rousseau proposes as the ideal one is based off of his concept of the nature of men. Men are born free and it is society that enslaves them, therefore, the goal of his ideal society is one that protects the people while also maintaining them as free as they were in nature. While to many philosophers maintaining security means renouncing some of an individual’s freedom, Rousseau believes that society can have one without the expense of the other. This only happens…

    • 1251 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Civilization creates a law which governs every individual among themselves through creation of equal rights. On the other hand, Rousseau argues that social contract helps individuals communicate among themselves in a way that there is creation of defense and protection. This enables the members of a given community to be able to obey themselves and remain free as before (Sol, 1789). Man is enslaved in such a way that the obstacles which entail the human preservation have been made greater, in that people cannot…

    • 967 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Organization of Society Machiavelli’s The Prince, a story is told, explaining multiple routes of portraying his definition of a “good” prince. He then divulges his beliefs of how one should never forget to prepare for or contemplate war, study history, remain armed at all times and be a “miser”. Rousseau’s The Origin of Civil Society, is based upon an entirely different morale which derives from reasoning and ethics.…

    • 1209 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Both Jean-Jacques Rousseau and Karl Marx share the political and economical ideology that private property separates society into classes, and creates oppression. However, the two view property in different regards. Rousseau views property in a more political view, while Marx focuses more on the economic sphere of property and society. This paper will first state Rousseau and his critique of property, inequality, and the emergence of society found in The Discourses. Then, it will contrast the political critique of Rousseau with that of Karl Marx’s economic critique regarding property, and include other critical parts of Marx’s work including the Jewish Question and the Communist Manifesto.…

    • 1114 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Law in Society Across all walks of life, law touches every aspect. It begins at birth to define citizenship and ends when a person dies with the dissemination of a will. They affect divorce, marriage, and sometimes pet ownership (Vago, 2009). Laws started as rules used to control individual behavior toward other individuals in society. The rules were aimed mainly toward unethical or wrong behavior that society deem inappropriate.…

    • 709 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For Rousseau human nature is simple, innocent and pious and he based this notion on the premise of the “state of nature” where humans were free and equal, and just seek to satisfy their basic needs (Rousseau 1974, p.80). What is more, Rousseau claims that society, as a whole should be the one, which guided by its general will, set up the laws (Rousseau 1974, p.96). Nevertheless, Rousseau's principles are not longer workable within the present society due to the fact that we do not longer live in a state of nature; rather in a corrupted and unequal system. For this reason is determinant to consider the premise that Human beings are bad, ungrateful, and fickle or as the Italian politician Machiavelli asserted, “men are wicked and they never do good unless necessity drives them to do it “ (Viroli 1998, p.47).…

    • 662 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Laws are an important element in a perfect society; it keeps a society together and function properly. It exists in order to protect each and everyone in the society, and promote good values in individuals. Imagine a society where there are no laws and rules to control everyone; it is absurd right? Laws are made for everyone in the society, and no one is exempted from it. No matter who someone is, whether one is poor or rich, they need to follow the same set of laws.…

    • 1992 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays