Primordial Soup Hypothesis:
The scientist involved in the hypothesis was A.I. Oparin and J.B.S. Haldane. The year the hypothesis was presented was in 1920. The claim of the scientist was that life began in a pond or ocean and chemicals in the atmosphere mixed to form all the the species today. The evidence that was presented to the scientist was that the first organisms were autotrophs. The experiments the scientist did was they mixed methane, ammonia, water , hydrogen , and not oxygen. The reasoning the scientist gave to support their theory was the result was nothing because they had problems with their theory like the early atmosphere had different chemicals and that amino acids have to become proteins. The Primordial Soup Theory. (n.d.). …show more content…
The year the hypothesis was presented was in 1968. The claim of the scientist was catalysts made entirely of RNA are likely to have been important at this early stage in the evolution of life. The evidence that was presented by the scientist was the RNA world did exist before DNA and protein based life. The experiments the scientist did was nothing because it is not solved yet because possibility that RNA was followed by some other copying or evolving molecule just as DNA and proteins were preceded by RNA. The reasoning that the scientist gave was that catalyst made of RNA is important to the early …show more content…
The claim of the scientist was that all things existed in the beginning but existed in small fragments of themselves. The evidence presented by the scientist was that bacteria fell from space into the ocean. The experiment involving in testing the hypothesis was that a meteorite blasted off from mars 15 million years ago and was found in antarctica in 1984 and in 1966 it was found to be contained of terrestrial nanobacteria.The reasoning that the scientist gave for supporting their theory was that all things have existed before and that bacteria from space could’ve created the
The scientist involved in the hypothesis was A.I. Oparin and J.B.S. Haldane. The year the hypothesis was presented was in 1920. The claim of the scientist was that life began in a pond or ocean and chemicals in the atmosphere mixed to form all the the species today. The evidence that was presented to the scientist was that the first organisms were autotrophs. The experiments the scientist did was they mixed methane, ammonia, water , hydrogen , and not oxygen. The reasoning the scientist gave to support their theory was the result was nothing because they had problems with their theory like the early atmosphere had different chemicals and that amino acids have to become proteins. The Primordial Soup Theory. (n.d.). …show more content…
The year the hypothesis was presented was in 1968. The claim of the scientist was catalysts made entirely of RNA are likely to have been important at this early stage in the evolution of life. The evidence that was presented by the scientist was the RNA world did exist before DNA and protein based life. The experiments the scientist did was nothing because it is not solved yet because possibility that RNA was followed by some other copying or evolving molecule just as DNA and proteins were preceded by RNA. The reasoning that the scientist gave was that catalyst made of RNA is important to the early …show more content…
The claim of the scientist was that all things existed in the beginning but existed in small fragments of themselves. The evidence presented by the scientist was that bacteria fell from space into the ocean. The experiment involving in testing the hypothesis was that a meteorite blasted off from mars 15 million years ago and was found in antarctica in 1984 and in 1966 it was found to be contained of terrestrial nanobacteria.The reasoning that the scientist gave for supporting their theory was that all things have existed before and that bacteria from space could’ve created the