Prevention And Retribution Models Of Punishment Similarities

Decent Essays
So, when analyzing the difference between the prevention and retribution models of punishment, we see similarities and differences. Some of the similarities of prevention to retribution are the ways in which punishment is delivered. Both believe in incarceration but for different reasons. Preventionists believe by locking up convicted criminals it will prevent others from committing similar crimes. They also think by that will convince that criminal from committing future crimes. Retributionists believe incarceration is the payment for the crime actually committed. They think the criminal will not repeat their crime because they have accepted responsibility and feel satisfied they have been punished adequately, and have paid back society.

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    3. The Retributivism punishment can be considered just as a revenge method since it will not benefit the criminal and…

    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In examining the similarities and differences between ‘Due Process and Crime Control’; both models are the exact opposites between each other. Due Process focuses on protecting individuals’ rights. Crime Control concerns the community as a whole. Both models have a certain extent where they can only believe what is right between on the individual or as a whole in the community. There are citizens and victims that are willing to see a balance between both models; however, some will neglect the adjustment with the perception.…

    • 676 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Little book of Restorative Justice talks about victim’s problems and desires, and how offenders are responsible to put right those harms, and contain victims, offenders and communities in this method. Then, to make the meaning of restorative justice even more clearly, he clarifies why it is not mainly understanding, mediation, how it’s used for insignificant offenses, an additional use for the legal system, a substitute for prison, or the contradictory of retributions. Zehr also states how Retributive and Restorative justice are similar. “A primary goal of both retributive theory and restorative theory is to vindicate through reciprocity, by evening the score.” (Zehr, Pg. 58).…

    • 1334 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    (1350)Against the Death Penalty: An Analysis of Reiman’s “Moderate” Retribution Theory This argument against the death penalty will examine the “moderate retribution theory of Jeffrey Reiman. In this theory, the premise of retribution for murder defines the validation of the death penalty, yet not in the abuse of justice found in the American criminal justice system. Reiman believes that the death penalty should be abolished because criminals are not always cognitively aware of the crimes that they commit, which demands the rehabilitation of the individual. Reiman argues against the death penalty because it offers an extreme form of punishment for crimes that are rarely “conscious” in the mind of the criminal.…

    • 1458 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The more offenders get treatment for their criminal behaviors, the less likely the person will reoffend (Irwin et al.). To begin to understand restorative justice, one must understand what it means to break the law. He or she must also understand what all crime entails and how it effects everyone around the offender. Retributive justice does nothing to help the offender recover from crime, nor does it stop any criminal behavior. On the other hand, restorative justice helps the prisoner or offender recover from criminal tendencies and re-enter society as a normalized citizen.…

    • 280 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Deterrence should be considered one of the primary objectives of the criminal justice system and criminal law because deterrence acts as a countermeasure against the probability of the occurrence of criminal acts in the future. Deterrence protects public from criminal acts because “The threat of punishment deters people from engaging in illegal acts” (Cassidy, n.d.). Restitution, on the other hand, is meant to give an opportunity to a perpetrator to rectify himself and to assimilate into the mainstream society, and such an act restores faith of the common public in the justice system, and this also provides opportunity to the justice system to refrain from providing long-term punishment mistakenly to an innocent. Retribution is a goal which must be accomplished by the criminal law in order to prohibit a perpetrator to roam free again and inflict untreatable wounds to the society. And, the objective of rehabilitation must be accomplished by the criminal justice system in order to transform a perpetrator into a responsible citizen and to thereby protect the society from yet another…

    • 1326 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    General deterrence is presumes that others in society will not commit crimes; because they will be caught and punished also general deterrence is the recognition that criminal acts results in punishment, and the effect of that recognition on society that prevents future crimes. 5. Describe restorative justice. The restorative justice models sentencing that shifts the focus away from punishment of the offender and emphasize the victim by holding offenders accountable for the harm they caused and finding opportunities for them to repair the damage.…

    • 569 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    SOIL Argumentative Essay

    • 918 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Crimes have been an issue since the origins of society, regardless of the actions taken by those in power, there will always be law breakers, and we know this because there’s never been a state without a crime. Therefore, if one cannot stop crimes then they must learn to limit crimes. I have been given two scenarios, both of which are unique yet intent to do the same thing. In my opinion, SOIL (subjects of interest list) is the most viable option and will result in more success. Success is measured by low recidivism rates as well as lower crime rates.…

    • 918 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Criminal justice is often centered around simple punishment for the offender. In a situation where a crime creates harm, justice is often synonymous with revenge. Restorative justice and rehabilitative therapy are two different approaches to justice that offer different perspectives and understanding of reconciliation. Both of these approaches allow for healing but the two different theories complete this objective in different ways. Restorative justice and rehabilitative therapy offer different in depth lenses of reconciliation in criminal justice through multi layered perspectives, while also sharing some concepts.…

    • 1016 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Restorative Justice Case Study

    • 1522 Words
    • 7 Pages
    • 18 Works Cited

    Introduction: Restorative justice is the idea that harm caused by a crime can be repaired (Wallis, 2007) and that the victim and community can be restored to how it was previously, rather than resorting to punishing the offender…

    • 1522 Words
    • 7 Pages
    • 18 Works Cited
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In the last 40 years, incarceration in the United States has reached epidemic proportions. We have the highest incarceration rate in the world; we hold 5% of the world’s population, but house 25% of the world’s prisoners (Kelly 2015). The use of incarceration has gradually become a more acceptable and more used form of punishment. As a result, our prison population is overflowing with offenders ranging from petty theft criminals to violent offenders. As cited in the textbook, purposes of our justice system should be retribution, deterrence, incapacitation, and rehabilitation, (Clear, Reisig, & Cole 2016, p.72-73) but we focus far too much on punishment first and rehabilitation second, if ever.…

    • 1156 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Once balance is restored, the chances of the prisoner re-offending are diminished (Inayatullah, 2011). In contrast, there is the punishment model. Inayatullah (2011) states that the argument is that all the rights are given to the offender and the victim has none. Therefore in this approach, the best way to reduce present day and future crimes is to keep serious offenders in jail. Evidence shows that twenty-five percent of criminal activity can be reduced by lengthy prison sentences.…

    • 1674 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Justified Murder Essay

    • 1941 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Justifiable Murder n after by sentencing over 72,000 to death in his reign. ()By the 1700’s English established that over 200 different crimes that would seem nearly insignificant today were punishable by death. For example, execution was a reasonable punishment for cutting down a neighbor 's tree. ( ) In the days of monarchy few doubted the morality of executions. Most believed that king had the divine right to do so from God himself.…

    • 1941 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Capital Punishment: an Act of Justice or Revenge? To many, executing the offender of a heinous and violent murder is seen as an act of justice and retribution, and is an essential aspect of maintaining moral balance, however, perhaps the stronger and more substantial position is that the death penalty is a barbarous act of revenge, motivated by emotion rather than logic. According to the “Retributive Justice Theory” those who break the law deserve to suffer punishment, and likewise, deserve to be punished in proportion to the crime committed.…

    • 1554 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Through the criminal justice system, when an individual has broken the law and committed a crime and is found guilty of that crime, they are held accountable for their criminal behavior and activities. Usually, through the use of a judicial decision, the offender is sentenced to undergo a certain penalty to insure the preventation of any and all future criminal activity. The shear purpose of sentencing is not only to punish the criminal and insure the deterrence of future criminal activity, but to keep the public safe. In the present day criminal justice system there are five different sentencing options, each with its own advantages and disadvantages. Of them are Retribution, Incapacitation, Deterrence, Rehabilitation, and Restoration. "…

    • 1690 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays