In covering current political events, various news outlets in America are driven by political ideologies, business sponsorships, and ties and connections of individuals or institutions within political spheres. These ideologies help to understand why different newspapers has different explanation on why President chose Neil Gorsuch as his Supreme Court nominee. For example, The Boston Globe article “Approve Gorsuch with a simple majority vote,” by Eric Fehrnstrom claims that president Trump chose Gorsuch to unifies the republican party. On the other hand, the USA Today article “Why Trump chose Neil Gorsuch as his Supreme Court nominee,” David Jackson claims that president …show more content…
This is how they are presenting him to the consumer. For example, for the New York Times describe him with higher accomplishment he got such as... this shows to the public and their viewers how Gorsuch is one of the elite American or one of the billionaires Trump is filling with his administration. While the USA today presented him to their viewers as a decent Americans citizen who does step-by-step of success by addressing that he went to Columbia, which is a school that any American can attend. Instead of talking about his Ivy League school that not everyone can abstain degree from. Every piece of those examples reflects on the problem of media consumption in which some people focus more on Fox News or other conservative news. On the other side, some consume from the New York time, CNN or other liberal media. This is so relevant to the controversy that we witness. In general, this is a problem because when people don't read from more than one news outlets they tend to don't understand fully picture, or the entire concept of story as draw from other options or other Conner of the …show more content…
As Davis and Landler wrote for The New York Times, “conservatives and business group cheered Judge Gorsuch, calling his record distinguished and his qualification unparalleled” (Davis and Landler 2). This shows that the conservative groups are happy with Gorsuch’s nomination and that provides a sign of unity. In fact, Fehrnstrom writes that Gorsuch has argued that “religious expression in public spaces is constitutionally protected” (Davis and Landler 6). This shows that Gorsuch is like Scalia in defending the religious views in turn of laws; therefore, catholic and evangelical Republicans will unify around