Argumentative Essay On The Atomic Bomb

Improved Essays
On July 16, 1945, Truman received news that the first ever atomic bomb was ready to be tested. This weapon was by no means just an experiment meant to store away and have in the event that conflict broke out and the US needed an effective way to protect itself from the offenders. The creation behind this weapon was solely to force Japan to surrender and allow the end of World War II. However, using it had been questionable ever since its initial creation, and especially after it had been tested for effectiveness. A weapon as powerful as the atomic bomb would cause a vast amount of death and destruction, the morality of using it was constantly questioned in different aspects. Due to the high pressure and fear of losing too many lives in a land …show more content…
During the time period of decision making, President Truman of the United States, along with Winston Churchill of Great Britain and Josef Stalin of the Soviet Union, gathered at the Potsdam Conference in Germany to discuss whether or not the bombs should be dropped. For Truman alone, it was one of the most difficult decisions of his life, due to all the consequences that may arise in the aftermath (Understanding the Decision to Drop the Bomb, 2012). Churchill also realized how heavy this choice was, knowing full well that the extraordinary power could lead to many other nations becoming interested in such weapons. However, after the matter was brought up to Stalin, it is speculated he didn’t necessarily understand the significance of the information he had been told, and he simply nodded and made arrangements for his nuclear scientist to see the US experts the following day (Houghton-Mifflin, 1953, p. 69-70). Because tensions between the Soviet Union and the United States had already been arising, Truman began to fear that Stalin would not only take interest in the weapons, but he would most likely attempt to begin experiments as well. The rivalry between the two nations most likely contributed to the overall decision, in the aspect that the United States had attempted to intimidate or impress the USSR with the newly-developed, overpowered weapon (The Manhattan Project: Making the …show more content…
This simply means that he had to consider all other aspects, but mainly focus on what was right in terms of war. Because of the conflict and fighting that had already been occurring, including the surprise bombing of Pearl Harbor a few years prior, Truman did have the justification he needed to give the order. The atomic bombs would make an end to the war much quicker, but would also provide vengeance to those of the Pearl Harbor attacks and give justice to the funding and time put into creating it. Alternatives had been brought, most suggesting that bombing a less populated area would be enough to intimidate them. However, Truman dismissed this and stated it wasn’t go to be enough to force them to surrender. “The decision to drop the bombs was ‘purely military’, meaning that it was made in order to save American lives, rather than allowing our enemies to only kill more soldiers and invade our land” (The Decision to Drop the Bomb). Truman himself even admits that over all the other aspects, putting himself in a military mindset gave view to each of the other categories on its own. Above all, Truman was only avoiding a land invasion and the mass killings of American soldiers, fearing that too many lives would be lost from both sides in that specific case. Truman’s decision to drop the atomic bombs was made in regards to political, controversial, cultural, and military events, but mostly to avoid

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Beside President Truman motivations which was to end the war, he was still new to this idea of the atomic bombs. Stimson Secretary of War brief him on the topic and advised Truman to drop the bombs. Stimson reasoning for doing this was to first end the war with Japan and secondly to scare the USSR. Since Truman wanted to know more so that he make the right decision and with Stimson they help formed the Interim Committee. It included high ranking military officials and top scientist from the Manhattan Project as advisor like Oppenheimer, Fermi, Lawrence, and Arthur Compton.…

    • 1049 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of The Atomic Bomb

    • 1201 Words
    • 5 Pages
    • 16 Works Cited

    Truman was the most important in the deciding factor of this situation. He was immediately thrown into this position after President Roosevelt's death on April 1, 1945 (Jennings). Though Truman didn't know much about the situation, he was one hundred percent confused, he knew the war had to end so American lives could be saved, even though he was aware that alternatives to using the bomb existed (Bird). If Truman had been more informed on the atomic bomb, he might have made a better decision, the right decision. Truman was informed on the atomic bomb mostly by James Byrnes, also known as "Mr. Atomic Bomb" (Jennings).…

    • 1201 Words
    • 5 Pages
    • 16 Works Cited
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    This is why many scientist spoke up when they heard how the bomb was being used and who it was being used against. In the being American first intended to target Germany with the atomic bomb, but when Germany surrender there was no point in dropping the bomb on them. If American would have did that, it would have made them look like a real bully. Way before the bombs were even dropped on Japan, many scientists, at the Chicago metallurgical laboratory, were against the bomb being dropped on Japan and felt like it would cause the world to be destroyed. The scientists were concerned about the dangers of nuclear power and that it would threaten civilizations.…

    • 634 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The US could have continued to fire bomb Japan with the risk of prolonging a war that was practically done, it could have demonstrated the power of the atomic bomb away from civilization with the risk that Japan would still not surrender or that the US would appear inept if the demonstration did not work. I believe Truman tried to follow the policies already established by Roosevelt to bring the conflict to end with unconditional surrender by the enemy and bring Americans back home. He was correct for his time, critics have all the time in the world to judge. I propose this, what if America did not use the bomb? Would America seem like a weak nation having power and not having the fortitude to use it or would Truman hide the technology as long as possible until it was needed.…

    • 824 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The difference between them; however, is how they present the idea of why we would use the atomic bomb in this circumstance. Document B, leaves the ending more open, letting the reader infer why we would drop the bomb. The author, a commander in the air force, would have known the true reasons, but yet again, like Truman, does not want to scare the public. He ends his argument in saying that “atomic bomb or no atomic bomb, the Japanese were already on the verge of collapse.” He wants the reader to understand what he is saying, which is that the U.S.A. was strictly doing this to scare Soviet Russia. Document F on the other hand, written by a physicist states this fact blatantly, that we need to do this to scare the Soviet Union.…

    • 1037 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Harry Truman and the Atomic Bomb There are many arguments on whether President Truman’s decision to drop the atomic bomb on Japan was the right one or not. Some historians say it was completely unnecessary while others believe his decision was made to save time and lives. The past cannot be changed but personal opinions on the matter can always be changed. Whether it was the correct thing to do or not, Harry Truman had to make the biggest decision of his life when faced with dropping the bomb. There are clearly many cons to dropping a very powerful atomic bomb on hundreds of thousands of civilians.…

    • 1537 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although the alternative of waiting for help from the Soviet Union would have been helpful, Truman believed that it wouldn’t necessarily put an end to the war. However, the decision to drop the atomic bomb was based on multiple crucial factors. One reason was that Truman was determined to end the war as soon as possible. Many American troops were being killed or injured and America needed some relief from war. Another reason was that the United States wanted to get revenge on Japan for the attacks that were made in Pearl Harbor.…

    • 1372 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Using the atomic bomb was rash decision to end the war before thinking of all the casualties. The United States decision to use the atomic bomb on Japan doesn 't seem to justify the ending of the war. The loss of civilian life and effect on citizens for decades after the bombing are one of main reasons why the united states should have altered their decision at the time. The United States claims to be a great super power and mitigator in times of distress however their decisions regarding the status of Japan prove…

    • 1012 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As with war, many families are left biting their fingernails waiting and hoping that their family members make it home safe. Added that the war in Germany was coming to a close, Americans were eager to see the Pacific war come to an end as well. This added pressure from the American people to find a way to quickly and efficiently end the war with Japan was put on Truman. After Roosevelt died, the secretary of war, Henry Stimson informed Truman of the new weapon of mass destruction that had been created . The atomic bomb was more devastating than the fire-bombings the United States dropped on Japan even though the fire-bombings had a higher death toll.…

    • 1231 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Japan severely suffered from the bombs and America were worried about their country and wanted to ensure that the war would be finished. I think that the atomic bomb could have been avoided. America did give warning prior to the bomb, however it all could have been avoided if they had continued with their plan to do a blockade and intense bombing. They did play an important key factor in starting the cold war, however they launched into the nuclear age at the same time. All these incidents were needed to have developed history, however the outcome could have been more positive if they had not launched the…

    • 705 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays