How Did Abraham Lincoln's Rise To Power

Improved Essays
One of the most powerful historical figures in American history, President Abraham Lincoln, initially became a member of Congress through the Whig party (a political party created in order to oppose Andrew Jackson as well as the Democratic party and to support protective tariffs). Moreover, an honorable President to this date, he became a part of the U.S. House of Representatives.
As Lincoln positively promoted the many progressive causes, including a national banking system and frontier settlement. Even after he became president, he still supported those causes. Another admirable thing he did was openly oppose slavery. A bill to end slavery in the District of Colombia was presented, but was not passed initially. However, during Lincoln’s
…show more content…
Lincoln wanted to keep the power of states in check, so he supported a new military policy campaign. This is the main cause of the birth of the Union. These new military policies brought a lot of drastic changes. Some state governors were told they were acting beyond their jurisdiction. Some military officials were arrested and put in jail for the suspicion of being international traitors. The overall power of the Confederate states was ultimately weakened because of the policies that Lincoln enforced, like the Homestead, Land Grant and Pacific Railroad Acts. Also, with the very first initiation of income tax and the very first issue of American currency, Lincoln set down a great foundation for the federal government through his role and actions as president of the United States. Many things from his influence still have an affect on the federal government …show more content…
But unfortunately, the Emancipation Proclamation only applied to the slaves specifically in the Confederacy. So ultimately, the Emancipation Proclamation was not very effective in banning slavery being that it barely applied to a small part of the country. Indirectly, it turned out the more slaves were freed through the war, instead of being freed through the Emancipation Proclamation. When Lincoln ran for re-election in 1864, he did so on the platform of total abolition amendment. Unfortunately, it did not come to fruition at that particular time. The amendment did not reach legislation until after Lincoln’s death and his successor, President Johnson, approved the amendment as a federal law. At the end of the day, Lincoln’s influence on emancipation was more indirect, and took affect in years after his term. But his influence is undeniable as very significant and progressive for the time, despite other politicians who criticized his

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The Republicans wanted to solve the problem through antislavery legislation while the radical reformers were quickly rash calling to go to war (94). These were the different ideology of the organizations that influence the methods that Lincoln and Douglass used to abolish slavery. Douglass was impulsive and narrow minded in the sense he only saw one solution to slavery which was the unions going into. As for Lincoln he was the President of the United States who had principles to uphold (132). For instance, he had to make sure the people were satisfied because the United States is base on the Constitution; in which a right is that the United States is for the people and the United States.…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    This period became known as Radical Reconstruction. Northerners attempted to give blacks full rights as citizens of the United States, which angered many Southerners and fuelled violence in the South. Republicans passed legislation for blacks but most of these were ignored by the South. Schools were set up but segregated blacks from whites and literacy rates only increased marginally. Radical Reconstruction was a minor improvement on Presidential Reconstruction but still did not live up to the hopes of African-Americans.…

    • 1180 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Reconstruction was suppose to help the citizens. However, it failed and left racial justice problems that people faced in the future. After the civil war, the North gave free slaves right to vote, which they were unfit to handle. Before his death, Lincoln was willing to forgive the southern states and bring them back in the Union. Lincoln even refused to sign the Wade- Davis Bill, which mandated strict requirement for the south before they could make their new government.…

    • 1136 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    If Northern legislators vehemently opposed slavery, they would have done more to reverse it. Even the new “antislavery” political parties that came about some years after the Compromise of 1850 did not attempt to actually free enslaved people. For example, William Lloyd Garrison once described the Free-Soil Party as “…a party for keeping Free Soil and not for setting men free.” Despite the blatant, horrendous moral injustices that slavery presented, self-declared opponents of slavery did little to oppose slavery based on…

    • 1309 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The loss of its slaves rendered the south greatly less able to produce the cotton it was selling to Britain and also stubbed the flow of weapons into the Confederacy. Twice before Lincoln 's Emancipation Proclamation, there were attempts to try something similar, first in August 1861, by General John C. Frémont in Missouri, second by General David Hunter, whose department encompassed South Carolina, Georgia, and Florida, in May 1862. Hunter did not have nearly enough men to enforce his decree. Lincoln revoked both of these decrees before issuing the proclamation. Lincoln first proposed the idea of emancipation in July of 1862 to his cabinet, but they persuaded him to wait until a victory against the south in the war to show confidence.…

    • 1102 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Those two things are complete opposites and do not go together, at all. The proclamation affected not only the North and SOuth involvement; it affected foreign involvement, also. Britain, along with other nations, considered being on the Confederate side, except they were against slavery. They ended up supporting the Proclamation instead (“The Emancipation Proclamation”). The Emancipation Proclamation was made for the better, despite the varying arguments.…

    • 1150 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Southerners relied on slaves to work on their plantations. The Constitution never said that having slaves was acceptable but abolitionists thought that slavery was a sin. It was said that “the abolitionists movement not only caused conflict over whether slavery should be abolished but was a major factor in bringing about the Civil War” (Bolotin 1). Slavery divided the North and the South but so did sectionalism. Sectionalism is defined as “loyalty to a state or section, rather than to the country as a whole” (Prentice…

    • 1801 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Abraham Lincoln guided the United States through the Civil War, one of the most bloody wars in history. Lincoln also persevered the Union, strengthened the federal government, put an end to slavery and even modernized the economy. He felt that the Civil war had a philosophical objective and that was a new birth of freedom in the nation. Lincoln soon contributed $2 million for war material from the Treasury with no confirmation from Congress, asked for 75,000 soldiers into military service, and even arrested or prosecuted suspected confederate sympathizers. Around this time he was having disputes with his generals, cabinets and more.…

    • 1765 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Save The Union Analysis

    • 483 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Indeed, by today's morals his philosophy wasn’t that accurate and possibly even incorrect, but in his day his thinking was deliberated advanced, even fundamental, although there were many more fundamental philosophers in his time period. He favored tactics, which would pay compensation to slave-owners for their freed slaves and relocate the freed slaves to some altered areas. As the 16th American president, focused to end slavery, Abraham Lincoln finally put a conclusion to his hard work by writing the Emancipation Proclamation. Abraham Lincoln had no objective on freeing the slaves when he was elected as the president of the United States of America. Even though Lincoln though Slavery was wrong, he always trusted in white control.…

    • 483 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When Lincoln made the Emancipation Proclamation (EP), he did not save all of the slaves. Most people think that the closure of slavery ended with Abraham Lincoln. He’s identified as the man who ended slavery, when in reality he only saved a few. "The Emancipation Proclamation didn 't actually free all of the slaves. Since Lincoln issued the EP as a military measure, it didn 't apply to border slave states like Delaware, Maryland, Kentucky and Missouri, all of which had remained loyal to the Union (History.com).” This proves that Abraham Lincoln only saved a few slaves, and that he only passed the Emancipation Proclamation as a military measure, not because it was right.…

    • 724 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays