After analyzing both passages , “Presentation 1- City video surveillance systems heighten public safety” and “Presentation 2- City video surveillance system violate American Rights”, the first presentation has proved that it is necessary to place video surveillance system to heighten public safety. The time has come to stop fighting our law enforcers and support the placement of video surveillance system in cities across the country.
First, city surveillance system is one of the many steps to increase public safety. Security measures have heighten since the 9/11 terrorist attack and the public has become accustomed to the increased security checks at important buildings, offices and airports. These systems were put in place in order to protect us.
Second, the data captures from the surveillance camera are very useful to police. When criminals victimize individuals, businesses, property owners or the masses these data will aid to bring perpetrator to justice. The system is equipped with facial –recognition software, which assist police to identify, track, and apprehend suspects. In 2013, after the Boston …show more content…
Police in Washington, DC, used cameras as a standard tool for examining crimes, including suspect defense. Since the implementation of this technological tool police in East Orange and New Jersey has seen 50% decreased in crimes.
Although Presentation 2 has, some good points to argue on there were not enough evidence to prove surveillance violates privacy rights. On the other hand, presentation 1 is backed with evidence why video surveillance system is necessary to protect Americans – it increases public safety at airports, offices, and important buildings. The system captures data that is useful for police to seek suspects and examining crimes. All in all these points proves that surveillance camera heighten public
First, city surveillance system is one of the many steps to increase public safety. Security measures have heighten since the 9/11 terrorist attack and the public has become accustomed to the increased security checks at important buildings, offices and airports. These systems were put in place in order to protect us.
Second, the data captures from the surveillance camera are very useful to police. When criminals victimize individuals, businesses, property owners or the masses these data will aid to bring perpetrator to justice. The system is equipped with facial –recognition software, which assist police to identify, track, and apprehend suspects. In 2013, after the Boston …show more content…
Police in Washington, DC, used cameras as a standard tool for examining crimes, including suspect defense. Since the implementation of this technological tool police in East Orange and New Jersey has seen 50% decreased in crimes.
Although Presentation 2 has, some good points to argue on there were not enough evidence to prove surveillance violates privacy rights. On the other hand, presentation 1 is backed with evidence why video surveillance system is necessary to protect Americans – it increases public safety at airports, offices, and important buildings. The system captures data that is useful for police to seek suspects and examining crimes. All in all these points proves that surveillance camera heighten public