Preliminary Hearing In Criminal Cases

Great Essays
The preliminary hearing provides a check against unwarranted prosecutions. Neubauer & Fradella (2014) teach, “During a preliminary hearing, the prosecutor must prove to a judge that a crime was committed and that there is probable cause to believe the defendant committed the crime. Given the low burden of proof, most of the time a judge finds that probable cause is present and orders the defendant held for further proceedings. There are very few cases dismissed at the preliminary hearing for lack of probable cause.” (p. 13).
During the preliminary hearing, the prosecutor presents only the amount of evidence necessary to demonstrate probable guilt. If the presiding judge determines that there is probable cause, the case will proceed to the next phase. While in some states, this next phase may be a grand jury hearing, and in others it may be the trial. Holloway (2014) enlightens, if the
…show more content…
In addition, there are approximately 350 municipal courts operating locally. There are two appellate-level courts: the Supreme Court and Court of Appeals. Judicial Council of Georgia (2015) educates, in criminal matters magistrates hold preliminary hearings, state courts conduct preliminary hearings in criminal cases, and municipal courts handle preliminary hearings.
American Bar Association. (n.d.) shares, a prosecutor ordinarily relies on police and other investigative agencies for investigation of alleged criminal acts, but the prosecutor has an affirmative responsibility to investigate suspected illegal activity when it is not adequately dealt with by other agencies. A prosecutor should not discourage or obstruct communication between prospective witnesses and defense counsel. A prosecutor should not advise any person or cause any person to be advised to decline to give to the defense information which such person has the right to give (std.

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Summary Of In Re Gault

    • 170 Words
    • 1 Pages

    During the adjudicatory process, there are usually two judicial hearings that the juvenile attends. The first is the initial appearance, is the equivalent of arraignment where the juvenile is notified of the charges against them, they are appointed legal counsel and bail is considered. If the case has not been settled by the close of the initial appearance, it is held for trial. In re Gault is the case that changed the nature of juvenile trials forever. In 1967, the United States Supreme Court ruled that defendants must be afforded the same rights as adults.…

    • 170 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Daniel Lavigne Case

    • 496 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Daniel R. Lavigne: This is a sentencing hearing. Daniel’s trial was in September of this year and was being charged of impaired driving and refusal to provide a DNA sample. Impaired driving is when the driver’s ability to safely operate a motor vehicle is compromised by the presence of alcohol or drugs in the driver’s system. He was convicted on October 28, 2015.…

    • 496 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Washington Vs Cantu

    • 519 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Case Citation: STATE of Washington, v. Antonio B. CANTU No. 76198-1., (2006). Parties: Antonio B. Cantu, Petitioner State of Washington, Respondent Facts: Antonio Cantu was arrested and tried for the crime of burglary after he forcefully entered his mother’s room that had a deadbolt on it. Once inside the room, Cantu took some objects that belonged to his mother. Procedural History: Cantu was originally charged with burglary, theft, possession of a legend drug, and minor in possession of alcohol.…

    • 519 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Lauren Coon Case

    • 517 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Similarly, if the unchallenged testimony will result in an “incorrect perception” in the jury’s mind, evidence of prior charges may be admissible. Reed v. Texas Dept. of Protective and Regulatory Services, No. 05-99-01529-CV, 2002 WL 244488 (Tex. App.—Dallas Feb. 21, 2002, no pet.) (holding that the defendant in a parental rights termination case “opened the door” to prior criminal charges—not convictions—by testifying that a minor’s family had no problem with the illegal…

    • 517 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The constitutional issue that arose in the court’s ruling in this case is centered on the first and second phases, out of the three that unfold in a criminal proceeding. The phases include; decision to arrest and charge, innocent until proven guilty, and imposition of the sentence (Betterman). Betterman argued violation or unfairness of the checks and balances associated with the first and second phases. The statute of limitations provides protection against a delay in the arrest and charge phase.…

    • 734 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Georgia court system consists of a Municipal Court, Magistrate Court, Probate Court, Juvenile Court, State Court, Superior Court, Court of Appeals and the Supreme Court. The Municipal Court has three hundred and seventy courts with three hundred and fifty two active Judges. The Municipal Court handles traffic offenses, local ordinance violations, conduct preliminary hearings, issue warrants, and they may handle misdemeanor shoplifting and possession of marijuana cases. The Judges in the Municipal Court can be appointed by the mayor or elected.…

    • 439 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “These courts have original and exclusive jurisdiction over violations of city ordinances” (“Trial Courts”). Municipal Courts often hear traffic cases, civil disputes, class “C” misdemeanor criminal cases with small fine as a punishment and other cases involving city ordinance violations. Each court has one judge, which can issue arrest and search warrants. Person can choose between the jury trial and the trial before the judge; retain an attorney or represent himself. Jury or judge renders a verdict of guilty or not guilty basing on evidences.…

    • 305 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In the process of sentencing an offender, we follow a set of rules known as the due process which considers the severity of a sentence, what charges have been laid, court hearings, and whether or not an arrest should take place. Such primitive procedure is used to prove the fact that a person is innocent until proven guilty.…

    • 58 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Wrongful convictions have been a topic of discussion for many decades within the United States Criminal Justice System. A wrongful conviction occurs when an individual is penalized in a court of law for a crime they never committed. Unfortunately, there are many components that can contribute to the unlawful arrest and conviction of an innocent person. Some of the variables can be as minuscule as an improper photo array line and as immense as government misconduct. Consequently, there are many flaws in the criminal procedure that leads to the conviction of an individual that increases the occurrence of wrongful convictions in America.…

    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Sixth Amendment simply ensured that the defendant in a federal criminal case who could afford to hire counsel would be entitled to appear through a lawyer, rather than being forced to defend himself. The U.S Supreme Courts and the State Supreme Courts came to an agreement that the government should provide lawyer to the vast majority of criminal defendants who cannot afford to hire a lawyer. According to Worrall the United State V. Wade (388 U.S.2189 (1967)) “The presence of counsel is necessary to preserve the defendant’s basic right to a fair trial”.…

    • 484 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jury Court Cases

    • 544 Words
    • 3 Pages

    It was clear that the defense attorney was trying to question the officer’s credibility and create doubt in the juror’s minds. I then saw a Redirect Examination, which is where following the cross examination the prosecutor may rehabilitate the witness, or repair any damage done to their cause by the defenses attorney’s questioning (Lippmann, 2014, p.533). The prosecutor was certainly trying to make the jurors aware of the officer’s expertise, having dealt with many DUI’s throughout his career. Judge Kams granted a Recross-Examination, which is when the defense may be permitted an additional opportunity to question the witness (Lippmann, 2014,…

    • 544 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Sixth Amendment Rights

    • 1333 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The right to counsel is something that a defendant should be allowed as our Sixth Amendment right states. Having this right, give the defendant their own choice as to who can represent them, when they are paying for it on their own accord. The Sixth Amendment rights state, “In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence. ”(Book).…

    • 1333 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Balancing the tension between community interest and individual rights and freedoms are a significant component of the criminal trial process and is relatively successful in that retrospect. In order to be effective and efficient the criminal trial process should reflect the moral and ethical standards of society, ensure the community is sufficiently protected and respects the rights of the individual. However, despite efforts to achieve justice for all members of society, the criminal trial process does fail to provide adequate success in some areas of the law such as the jury system, Legal Aid and the provocation defence. All these areas to an extent highlight the lack of success the criminal trial process serves in balancing community interests…

    • 1138 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Imagine, you have lived your life without cause, you are a law abiding citizen, you have never been in trouble, furthermore, your life is established, your married, you have kids, the perfect job, life is excellent. Then one day, by haps, you are stopped, detained, arrested, charged with a crime, not just a crime, a violent crime, a crime that is unspeakable, child molestation! Your life is upside down, your wife, your family, your friends, even your co-workers all look at you differently. However, your innocent, and you protest such, to everyone who is willing to listen to you, however, you cannot get over the fact that no one is listening to your cries, now your life is in the hands of strangers, a prosecutor, defense attorney, judge, and…

    • 719 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The same can be said for the conduct of the prosecutor and his team. Some say the phrase, “Innocent until proven guilty” helps the defendant in a courtroom, and that the prosecutor has the burden of proving guilt. The pretrial detention is defined as the detaining of an accused person in a criminal case before the trial as even taken place in court. Normally the reason this type of action takes place is because either failure to post bail, or due to the denial of release under a pretrial detention statue.…

    • 1267 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics