Prejudice In 12 Angry Men

Improved Essays
In today’s society one of the ongoing problems is, too many men and women are prejudice. Prejudice is a burden that confuses the past, browbeats the future and leaves the present baffling. No one is born prejudiced, it is taught. Prejudices are the chains forged by ignorance to keep men and women apart. In the popular novel based on a true story “To Kill a Mockingbird” by Harper Lee, prejudice is also one of the ongoing problems.

In the novel, To Kill a Mockingbird by Harper Lee, the main character (Scout) and her brother (Jem) live in a very racist time period. When the father of the two children (Atticus) is asked to defend a black man named Tom Robinson in a case involving a white women of the age of nineteen (Mayella Ewell). Mayella
…show more content…
At the beginning the judge starts to explain the case to all of the jurors. The main jurors are juror 3,8,7, and 10. All of the jurors are in a rush to get out of the courthouse, already none of them are in the mood as it is also a hot summer day. As the script starts to go more in depth about the case, they first begin with taking a vote, which was 11-1. Juror 8 did not think he was guilty and juror 3 started to question juror 8 on why. Juror 3 was positive that the defendant had killed his father, and he had only heard a little bit of detail on the case. Juror 3 was prejudice from the beginning, he made an assumption that this nineteen year old boy had killed his father because of where he had come from and what his record looked like. The defendant had a far from clean record but that certainly does not mean he is capable to commit a crime like this one. After they had gone over some evidence Juror 4 had said “We’re missing the point here. This boy--- let’s say he’s a product of a filthy neighborhood and a broken home. We can’t help that. We’re not here to go into the reasons why slums are breeding grounds for criminals. They are. I know it. So do you. The children who come out of the slum backgrounds are potential menaces to society”(Rose 8). Juror 4 said that anyone who lives in a lower socioeconomic area is destined to cause trouble in society.Just …show more content…
Everyday life especially at Mchenry West high school there is an unbelievable amount of judgement. For example, recently I had an ex-friend that was involved with a harassment on social media, she disrespectfully called a girl horrendice names because she heard rumors about her from a boy. Another big part of being prejudice is racism. I take this subject very seriously ,these days it’s just because someone looks different, they don’t deserve to be treated like a normal human being. It’s like saying just because someone is a bigger size than you they don’t deserve to eat. Nowadays even our president is racist. This affects me greatly, and I can only imagine for the younger children out there that are growing up to think it’s alright to treat someone differently just for the way they look. These people are born that way and we use it against them. It’s transversal, a black person can also be prejudice and that goes for every race or

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    In Reginald Rose’s Twelve Angry men, a 19 year old boy is on trial for the murder of his father. 12 jurors hold the fate of his life in their hands, by deciding whether or not he is guilty. They decide this by the use of reasonable doubt, looking at the evidence given for the case, and the witnesses testimonies. The boy is considered a “slum” or to have grown up in the slums ; a very populated area with run-down buildings and people that may have had, or have a financial burden, or don’t have the money to take care of their families and have a “nice” house at the same time. Due to prejudice from some jurors and sympathy from others, and the general diversity between the them, you can put yourself in their positions, and decide whether he is…

    • 146 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A Lack of Morals “Jem, how can [Mrs. Gates] hate hitler so bad an’ then turn around to be ugly about folks right here at home-” (331). Scout is wondering how her teacher and the rest of the town of Maycomb can hate hitler for persecuting people, while they themselves are oblivious that they are persecuting african americans. Harper Lee’s novel “To Kill a Mockingbird” follows a young girl named Scout Finch and her brother Jem Finch. They live in a small, fictional, racist town by the name of Maycomb, Alabama. Scout’s father Atticus is a lawyer who is appointed to a case to defend a african american man by the name of Tom Robinson.…

    • 1057 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the play “Twelve Angry Men” there is a lot of prejudice. It mainly shows that people like to judge other people without any actual knowledge. Prejudice is still a major issue in the world and it will always be one. People like to judge others before even getting to know them. It is bad to be prejudiced before even trying something out or meeting someone.…

    • 427 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One will never be able to fully understand the effects of prejudice unless you are the one that it pertains to. Many people make prejudice statements without even knowing it. It’s as simple as making fun of the way someone talks, how they dress, or what they look like, but personal prejudice was taken to a completely different level in Cairo. Martha Collins’ Blue Front is full of poems containing her research on the town of Cairo, Illinois and what her father experienced as a young boy living there.…

    • 898 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The word racism, what does it referred to? According to google definitions, “The belief that all members of each race possess characteristics or abilities specific to that race, especially so as to distinguish it as inferior or superior to another race or races”. As individuals, we see ourselves more superior than others. In "TO KILL A MOCKINGBIRD", one of the major themes is racism.…

    • 711 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Their choice would either send an 18-year-old Hispanic man to death or set him free. When the twelve men were locked in the deliberation room, the jury foreman acted as the facilitator for the group. It was the jury foreman that got everyone focused for the initial vote. It was important get everyone focused because the group was busy discussing their personal life, occupations, and their future plans. They were not discussing the case because they assumed everyone would vote the same.…

    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This statement by juror nine gives the viewers an understanding on how good juror eight appealed to the emotions of the others. He did not say that the boy wasn’t guilty; he provided evidence, and showed the others that there are possibilities that the boy did not kill his father. The discussion continues as they bring up the testimony of the witnesses of the murder. Juror eight appeals to the emotions of the jurors once again;…

    • 1678 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Another important fact was the defendant’s ethnicity and low socioeconomic class. Most of the jurors were mostly middle-aged, white males from the middle-class status. These descriptions were different from the defendants, which made it difficult for the jurors to be sympathetic to the defendant. Juror #5, however, had experience living in a slum area, and so he could sympathize a little for the young man, and after several votes, he voted “not guilty” for the defendant. This example exhibits that if the juror are similar, the juror would tend to sympathize with the…

    • 977 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One of the main topics that was displayed in the movie was conformity. Conformity can be described as the act of changing one’s behavior to fit in with a group (Crutchfield, 1955). After the closing arguments of the trial, deliberations by the jurors begin on whether the boy is guilty or not. As the jurors make themselves comfortable in the jury room, casual exchanges are made between the jurors. This is where the first step of conformity takes place.…

    • 884 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    First of all, they start talking about the knife that was used to kill the victim. All evidence points out that the knife was purchased by the boy and that he used it to kill his dad. Even though the boy said that he lost the knife, the jury is convinced that it is the same knife because it is a very rare and unique one, but then the juror #8 takes out of his pocket and exact look like knife, staying that he bought it at a pawn shop at the boy’s neighborhood pointing out that there is a possibility that anyone could have used a similar knife to kill the victim. At this moment some of the men start to doubt about their judgement. Then, juror #8 calls out for another voting, so they can find out if somebody has change his mind.…

    • 810 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Prejudice, Makes One Act Differently “Prejudice is a chain, it can hold you. If you prejudice, you can 't move, you keep prejudice for years. Never get nowhere with that” (Bob Marley). Prejudice is a prevalent notion occurring in the world on a daily basis.…

    • 1713 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He was one of the most timid Juror, and since he shared similar background with the defendant, Juror 8 made personal connection with him and seeked his consultation (consistently asking him for his opinion). After the trial he voted guilty because he felt everyone else thought the same too, he was not the kind of person who had a strong stand like Juror No.8. But at some level he was confident about his decision (guilty) since, he did not change his vote (during the second vote) even after he was insulted by other Jurors about his origin. The reason for not changing his decision maybe he felt that it was not right to let a murderer out in the street because he was offended by other Jurors.…

    • 1100 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Except for juror number eight, peer pressure impaired their judgment. Based on his maturity level it indicated that the greatest differences are found in juror number eight and three. Once juror (Jack) changed his vote from guilty to not guilty only because the rest of them eventually voted not guilty also. It showed many times that the several jurors changed their minds from not guilty to guilty and vice versa under peer pressure, and overpowering of the strong willed ones.…

    • 1416 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Juror 3 Analysis

    • 936 Words
    • 4 Pages

    but there is time constraint and group think has been taken place in the movie. Juror 3 is a biased against the 19-year old boy and he stands strongly in his vote of guilty. As a juror, he has an expected to assist the judge to give a fair trial.…

    • 936 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Groupthink In 12 Angry Men

    • 1168 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Also, the members of the jury questioned the testimony of the old man. They questioned how the old man ran to the door and down the hall in such a short amount of time, yet he drug his leg when he walked and had a stroke the previous year. The jury questioned why the boy could not remember what movie he was supposedly at. They thought his knife was very unusual until one of the jurors bought the same exact knife for cheap right beside the boys house. The jury questioned how the women across the street could see into the window without wearing her glasses and they questioned how she turned over in bed at just the right time that she saw the murder happen.…

    • 1168 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays