The University of Alabama at Birmingham
School of Nursing
NUR 701
Evidence Table Template
Student Name: Keri Watson
Criteria: Source 1: Source 2:
First Author (Year) Mohta, M, et al. (2009) Watkins, TR, et al. (2012)
Conceptual Framework none none
Design and Methods Prospective, randomized study
This pilot study was conducted to compare continuous TEA and continuous TPVB for pain management in patients with multiple rib fractures and to assess the outcomes in each group. Prospective cohort study
This study sought to develop and validate a predictive instrument for ARDS after major trauma and compares the model’s performance to two other published predictive models using the same independent validation cohort.
Sample and Setting n=30
15 in group TEA, 15 in group TPVB
Setting: ICU within Guru Teg Bahadur Hospital, Delhi, India. n=224 in randomized control trial n=1762 in validation cohort
Setting: University-affiliated level I trauma center in Seattle, WA …show more content…
The ISS, Glasgow Coma Score, and APACHE II Score, which were calculated at the time of arrival to the emergency department, were available for each data set.
Measurement Data was collected by clinical personnel and entered into a database for study. Both data sets contained data abstracted from hospital medical records including demographic, comorbidity, physical examination, resuscitation, and outcome data. Data quality was ensured by the training of research nurses in the recognition of ARDS, as well as the use of trained data entry personnel and regular internal
School of Nursing
NUR 701
Evidence Table Template
Student Name: Keri Watson
Criteria: Source 1: Source 2:
First Author (Year) Mohta, M, et al. (2009) Watkins, TR, et al. (2012)
Conceptual Framework none none
Design and Methods Prospective, randomized study
This pilot study was conducted to compare continuous TEA and continuous TPVB for pain management in patients with multiple rib fractures and to assess the outcomes in each group. Prospective cohort study
This study sought to develop and validate a predictive instrument for ARDS after major trauma and compares the model’s performance to two other published predictive models using the same independent validation cohort.
Sample and Setting n=30
15 in group TEA, 15 in group TPVB
Setting: ICU within Guru Teg Bahadur Hospital, Delhi, India. n=224 in randomized control trial n=1762 in validation cohort
Setting: University-affiliated level I trauma center in Seattle, WA …show more content…
The ISS, Glasgow Coma Score, and APACHE II Score, which were calculated at the time of arrival to the emergency department, were available for each data set.
Measurement Data was collected by clinical personnel and entered into a database for study. Both data sets contained data abstracted from hospital medical records including demographic, comorbidity, physical examination, resuscitation, and outcome data. Data quality was ensured by the training of research nurses in the recognition of ARDS, as well as the use of trained data entry personnel and regular internal