Pros And Cons Of Pas

Improved Essays
Much like Brittany, and many others that have made similar statements in similar situations, I believe that everyone has moral right to do as they please with their life as long as there is no harm done to anyone else. This includes PAS. When someone cannot end their own life in a dignified way when they so choose because of a disability or disease, they should have the right to the help of a physician. This right if requested should then be respected especially when it comes to painful terminal illnesses. In fact denying such a request to me seems cruel. It seems cruel to make someone live in pain and suffering even if it is a short while. I also believe in order to prevent innocent deaths there needs to be strict laws in place to safeguard individuals from false requests of PAS. I also realize in theory PAS may seem like a good idea but as we go deeper into discussion PAS may not be the most practical process. On the flip side I can see how some may oppose PAS from a religious stand point since many religions, especially Catholics, believe that those who commit suicide go to hell; although it could be …show more content…
I then would discuss with them the pros and cons of PAS. First, we would discuss whether they have been diagnosed with a terminal disease, how much pain they are in and other possible options. Secondly, whether the state we were in was a Death with Dignity state. If not do we have the finances to move or find another option. Once there request was official, if not mandatory, I would personally request a psychiatric review for my said family member to confirm no mental illness is present and that they are in fact in extreme pain. I think I would try to have a discussion with them to make sure they were in no way coerced by anyone, that someone had not made them feel like such a burden that they need to go through with this

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Pas Vs Euthanasia

    • 928 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Individuals who are for legalization of PAS believe that a competent patient should be to choose the timing and manner of their death. There is the belief that a terminally ill patient has the right to refuse specific medical treatment plans if it only prolongs their death. Moreover, if an individual’s quality of life is hindered with consequences such as a loss of independence, loss of self and functional capacities to the point that there is an inability to relieve the suffering, then PAS is viewed as an act of compassion. Society believes in preserving life, illegal PAS excessively limits personal liberties by disallowing a terminally ill person with a strong desire to end their life. Lastly, more transparency between patient and physicians could promote better end of life…

    • 928 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Vice versa, a patient whose family pressures her to choose life when it would be the better option to have PAS. Additionally, there is a moral distinction between killing and letting die. Currently, some “physician assisted suicides” are legal such as a doctor forgoing treatment upon a patient’s request or terminal sedation, where medical staff gives the patient pain medication until she dies. Thus, why are some methods of PAS allowed but euthanasia is not? Velleman argues because the option would harm the patient but perhaps it is more an issue of…

    • 1271 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If people have the right to abort a pregnancy due to complications or simply because the pregnancy is unwanted, then a terminally ill person should have the right to end their agony. Why should one termination be frowned upon more than the others? By enacting the Death with Dignity law in every state, individuals are given a sense of control of their lives; furthermore, it gives them assurance that their love ones will not have to witness them…

    • 1175 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    PAS opponents believe that it is morally unacceptable for a physician to assist in ending a person’s life because it a moral profession and allowing a person to request that the physician make the decision to end someone’s life isn’t morally right. However, the Oregon law makes it very clear that the only role that a physician is to determine whether the person has a terminal disease and if the person is competent which are both medical judgements and does not require the physician to make any moral judgements. Then the physician is to assist the person with the decision that they have made themselves and how best to cope with this decision. Opponents also argue that as long as a physician is knowingly involved in the process which involves suicide that it violates the medical duty to promote health. However, a physician’s duty to promote health isn’t their only duty because it would be ethically wrong for a physician to release a person from their care because there is no treatment for their illness.…

    • 2296 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Americans are taught from an early age that everyone is born with certain unalienable rights. The right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness are characterized as legal truths that cannot be taken away or denied. However, one must wonder if the right to life coincides with the right to die. This is the very question that has sparked controversy all throughout the nation regarding physician-assisted suicide (PAS). To clarify, the right to die is a person’s decision to end their life with the medical help and guidance from their doctor.…

    • 1583 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Controversy of Physician Assisted Suicide According to the Constitution every person has the right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. The statement means no one needs permission to live and each person has the right to do what make him or her happy even if it means dying (Bowden 36). There are many people throughout the United States that believe Physician Assisted Suicide is wrong, however, there are also many people who believe it is a human right. The controversy of PAS can be understood by learning what it is and where it occurs, why it should be legal, and why it should not be legal.…

    • 1397 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    They deserve the choice how they want to die. They must not be put through the pain of living with their condition when they know they are a liability to their families, the medical staff and the government. Note however, that this does not mean allowing people to use physician assisted suicide on their own free will. They must still meet the pre-established conditions and their case must be approved by legal bodies. No one must be placed above the law to use this law against the system for personal gains and…

    • 831 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Some argue that PAS is ethical. Often this is argued on the grounds that PAS may be a rational choice for a person who is choosing to die to escape unbearable suffering. Furthermore, the physician's duty to alleviate suffering may, at times, justify the act of providing assistance with suicide. This relies a great deal on the notion of individual autonomy, recognizing the right of competent people to choose for themselves the course of their life, including how it will…

    • 1421 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When healing a patient is no longer possible, death is imminent and suffering is unbearable the physician's role should shift from healing the patient to relieving their suffering according to their wishes (M. Angell). With that being said, physician assisted suicide should be left as a last resort to be used when all other options have been expended. Keeping someone alive against their will and forcing someone to suffer is as much of a crime as taking someone's life without their consent (F. Girsh). Without PAS patients are subjected to unwanted medical treatment or completely abandoned altogether. Medical technology has advanced incredibly over the years but for the terminally ill it only prolongs suffering (E. De La Torre).…

    • 982 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Everyone in the world will experience the subject of death at some point their lives. The common wishes in regards to this subject are to die a peaceful death, surrounded by loved ones, with no suffering. A practice that would allow terminally ill patients to have this wish granted is the practice of physician-assisted suicide. Physician-assisted suicide, or PAS, is an action in which a physician provides a terminally ill patient with the means to end his or her own life. Most people want to be in control of their own end-of-life decisions.…

    • 986 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Moreover,the logic of decriminalizing PAS for the terminally ill who are suffering grievously would lead inexorably to allowing other types of killing. If the rational for PAS is to respect autonomy,then why limit it to those are terminally ill?Why privilege the autonomy of those who are suffering and terminally ill above those who are suffering chronically? If the rational for PAS is that person is in misery or has allegedly lost her dignity-if,for such people,death is a benefit-then it will be impossible to deny this alleged benefit to those who lack decision making capacity,those who are unconscious, or demented, or too young to have such capacity. Thus out of respect for life,and out of compassion and care for the elderly,dying and disabled,PAS…

    • 123 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If a person is terminally or chronically ill they should have the right to physician assisted suicide. These ill people who are of sound mind and judgment should have the right to die peacefully and with assistance if this is what they choose to do. The choice should be theirs and they should not have to suffer more than necessary, they should be able to save their family the financial ruin and they should be able to leave this earth is in a dignified manner, free of pain. Jack Kevorkian was a Pathologist who lived in Michigan where assisted suicide was not legal. The fact that it was not legal did not stop him from assisting those in need.…

    • 1041 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I am one of many people who believe that life is precious and every second of it should be appreciated. When questioned about whether one person should be able to assist in another’s suicide legally, I feel I would have a hard time answering that. The answer really entirely depends on the situation the person is in. Do they want to leave the world just because something bad has happened or are they suffering from severe pain? To be able to commit an assisted suicide, I think the person who assists in the suicide as well as the one who wants to suicide should go through a certain deduction process to see if they can do it legally.…

    • 667 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Regarding the topic of ‘death with dignity’, the legalization of PAS and euthanasia offers terminally ill patients self-autonomy, and as will be shown, gives them comfort, confidence, and closure. A person’s last moments on earth should not be spent needlessly suffering from severe physical pain. Terminally ill patients become dependent on other people for their nutrition, hydration, and hygiene (Levin). Instead of spending time in discomfort, the terminally ill should be at rest. The process deserves to be joyful and respectful.…

    • 1505 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Imagine if you were lying in a hospital bed and you and your loved ones are being informed that your life has taken a turn for the worse, which has impacted your quality of life forever by having a terminal illness. Are you willing to make a decision to take the easy way out? What would your choice be? Do we truly have the right to cross the fine lines of life and death? Do you think we have the right to decide who gets to live and who doesn’t?…

    • 998 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays